When Saddam is captured

Jump to First Reply
aquafireaquafire
Posted:
in General Discussion edited January 2014
Yes I know I'm a little ahead of myself,

but when he IS captured do you think the USA should :



(A) Put him on trial in the USA ?



(B) Hand him over to a future Iraq government to put on trial ?



(C) Hand him over the International Court of Justice in the hague...

Like Milosovic ?



(D) Hand him over to Israel ?
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 21
    shawnpatrickjoyceshawnpatrickjoyce Posts: 2,417member
    Change the title, dude.











    "Wait, he's not captured!?"



    "Arrggghhh!"
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 21
    aquafireaquafire Posts: 2,758member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by ShawnPatrickJoyce

    Change the title, dude.











    "Wait, he's not captured!?"



    "Arrggghhh!"



    I meant to post when Saddam is captured.

    Now the stupid thing won't let me edit the title !
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 21
    shawnpatrickjoyceshawnpatrickjoyce Posts: 2,417member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by aquafire

    I meant to post when Saddam is captured.

    Now the stupid thing won't let me edit the title !



    Sorry. That sucks.



    I think "D" would be the best choice.







    But realistically I think C is more practical.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 21
    aquafireaquafire Posts: 2,758member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by ShawnPatrickJoyce

    Sorry. That sucks.



    I think "D" would be the best choice.







    But realistically I think C is more practical.





    Thanx 4 not chewing my head off !\
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 21
    pscatespscates Posts: 5,847member
    B or C, I guess. I think B is more appropriate. It's Iraq that he did so much damage to and caused so much suffering. Would seem to be, in my mind, more in the interest of justice to have his country deal with him.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 21
    splinemodelsplinemodel Posts: 7,311member
    CONFIRMED!!!





    Sorry guys.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 21
    scottscott Posts: 7,431member
    The title does suck. I hope this gets locked.





    C and D are out. D for no other reason than the world's biggest hypocrites, arab muslims, would bomb small kids over it. What heros of Islam



    I think a trial in Iraq is the best.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 21
    scottscott Posts: 7,431member
    Ah you DPed too.



    http://forums.appleinsider.com/showt...threadid=23883
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 21
    stunnedstunned Posts: 1,096member
    Option C is the most sensible choice. But the Americans are probably going adopt option A.



    But frankly speaking, I dun care. Just seeing him captured will be good for me.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 10 of 21
    buonrottobuonrotto Posts: 6,368member
    The answer should be C,but of course the international courts are just a soapbox for sociopathic lunatics, so the answer is E, there is nothing good or proper that could be done with him.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 11 of 21
    scottscott Posts: 7,431member
    If he had a strong hand in 9-11 I vote for A. Barring that then B without the "hand over".
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 12 of 21
    trumptmantrumptman Posts: 16,464member
    Where is selection E) which is let some put a slug in his head and then just "discover" the corpse?



    Nick
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 13 of 21
    sammi josammi jo Posts: 4,634member
    Option B in Iraq is the best bet, provided it was a fair trial by a judge and jury of his fellow citizens selected from all a cross section of Iraqi society, and not a kangaroo court set up by the occupying powers. Option C is the other possibility but procedure would take a lot of hashing out. Options A and D would never result in anything approaching a real trial.



    Actually....on second thoughts: The very LAST thing that the US wants is for Saddam to have any form of trial, for a number of what should be very obvious reasons. Perhaps this is why the US went after Saddam from the start of the war with the intention of killing him outright.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 14 of 21
    aquafireaquafire Posts: 2,758member
    [QUOTE]Originally posted by Scott

    [B]Ah you DPed too.



    Like I said Scott,

    Moderator doesn't allow change of title.

    Content Yes..Title No...which Sux..embarrasing.



    I meant for it to read "When Saddam is captured "

    So a thousand apologies.\
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 15 of 21
    haraldharald Posts: 2,152member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Scott

    If he had a strong hand in 9-11 I vote for A. Barring that then B without the "hand over".



    Uh huh.



    And he stalled the G4 clockspeed too.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 16 of 21
    ghost_user_nameghost_user_name Posts: 22,667member
    Title fixed. Carry on, folks.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 17 of 21
    aquafireaquafire Posts: 2,758member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Brad

    Title fixed. Carry on, folks.



    Thanx a whole bunch Brad..
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 18 of 21
    monkeyastronautmonkeyastronaut Posts: 1,343member
    Have the World Organization keep him in a maximum security prison in Geneva guarded by sharks with freakin' laser beams attached to their heads.



    Muahaha...



    Muahahahahaha!



    Muahahahahahahahahhahahaha!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 19 of 21
    aquafireaquafire Posts: 2,758member
    You mean something like this ?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 20 of 21
    monkeyastronautmonkeyastronaut Posts: 1,343member
    Exactly!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.