Why Apple won't buy TikTok, even to attract younger users
Apple has the finances to buy just about anything, but with TikTok there are more reasons than money that mean it won't buy the social media platform.

TikTok on a smartphone
For a company that has so much success, Apple is far from immune to failure -- and sometimes repeated failures. For whatever reason, Apple seems incapable of launching a social media platform, despite trying, so buying one should be a possibility.
Right now TikTok isn't exactly up for sale to the highest bidder, but it's close - as long as that bidder is America. No question, if Apple wanted to buy TikTok, it could even though Bloomberg estimates on Sunday that it would cost up to $60 billion.
Just as how Apple will never buy Disney no matter how many pundits tell it to, the price is not the problem, though. Not even when the price of buying Disney has been estimated at north of $175 billion.
The case against buying Disney, however, is more nuanced than buying TikTok. Both would have issues over how the companies would operate within Apple, but Disney could at least temporarily carry on exactly as it is doing.
TikTok can't. Under the terms of the US ban, TikTok can only be restored if an American company runs it entirely. Apple could doubtlessly hire people currently working for TikTok, but it would still be starting up a whole new operation.
And it would be setting up that operation in a market it has so far shown little competence. And it would be setting up that operation with a social media platform that will not be free of competition even after it's bought.
That's because TikTok as it stands is already limiting search results in a way that seems to be done to appease the more right-wing of the US's politicians. Various searches to do with, for instance, abortion, are already returning fewer or no results in the US compared to other countries.
Apple has to operate within the law, so if this type of censorship is made mandatory, it will have to do it. But if Apple censors, it will be Apple that gets a bad press rather the US government.
Moderation in all things
Then even if there is no political or legal pressure applied externally on Apple's TikTok, there will be immense pressures inside it. TikTok requires extensive moderation, and that costs a great deal of money.
Which is really why Meta and others have abandoned any moderation. There is of course an element of currying favor with the new US administration, but the cash saving is immense.
It would be for any company, so Apple could save a lot of money and effort if it bought TikTok and allowed anyone to say anything on it, without the remotest oversight. But when controversy blows up -- and it is when, not if -- it will again be Apple that gets the bad press.
TikTok would be easy to buy, but Apple would really be buying a world of hurt that it doesn't need and has no experience handling well. A $60 billion price tag would not be the problem but buyers' remorse would be.
Separately, Apple has radically cut down the number of firms it buys in the last few years. Its biggest-ever acquisition remains Beats, which cost $3 billion -- 20 times less than TikTok would cost -- back in 2014
Read on AppleInsider

Comments
As if they didn't have a big enough target on their backs as it is...
The same arguments would apply if Apple started its own search engine. I am sure that we will soon start seeing Google change its promotion algorithms to put his latest grift subject at the top of all result sets.
IMHO, it is far better for Apple to stay well clear of that part of the DC swamp. There be leopards ready to eat Tim Cook's face.
You mean abandonment of outright censorship demanded by the previous admin on differing opinions, inconvenient facts, and even jokes in some cases.
There are reports of hundreds of thousands of people leaving Twitter since Elon ruined it by making people follow him and other right-wingers. The same goes for Facebook since Zuck announced that Fact Checking was a thing of the past.
I never saw the attraction of (anti-)social media after a bad experience with MySpace.
There is life outside of Social Media.
TikTok -- list most other social networks -- operates on a completely different business model. Those services make money selling user activity data to advertisers, etc.
This is why Apple shuttered their ill-fated iTunes Ping (mostly focused on music discussion) in 2012 and has never since dabbled in social networking since. It's also why they don't run their own search engine even though they have been perfectly capable of spidering the entire Internet and setting up their own search engine for the past 25+ years.
Apple buying TikTok is nonsense, just like Insta, Snap, Path, imeem, Myspace, et cetera ad nauseam. For Apple to consider such a move would require a fundamental change in their business model from the top down. For sure Tim Cook and the senior management team are not the people to do this. And the current board of directors aren't applying any pressure on Apple management to move this direction.
Like buying a piece of land and then finding out it is a cousin to Chernobyl.
The bottom line is that Apple is a company that wants to turn a profit. The most foolish thing a company can do is pigeon hole themselves. They have certain strengths from decades of experience and expertise, but that doesn't mean they can't use that to move into other industries
Imagine if a company that produces energy via mining for coal only ever perceived themselves as a coal mining company? Eventually they die out. Now, if they look at themselves as an energy company they can mine for coal and still research and develop other ways in which to produce energy.
Blockbuster is a great example of not seeing the bigger picture. With 16% of their revenue coming from late fees they chose not to invest in an online service because it eat that revenue. They were so focused on the current state of business that they lost everything because of it. No company can truly innovate if you only ever focus on the current quarter's earning report.
Apple had an ad business for over 6 years called iAd. This didn't change their business model and that was absolutely using targeted ads the way Meta and Alphabet do. Apple could absolutely make a search engine. I'd love for them to make one like Kagi that's excellent. The issue here isn't ability, but that they get a lot of money from Alphabet to make Google the default. $20 billion per annum, IIRC.
You say that and yet you already acknowledged that Apple bought Ping. Buying Ping didn't change their business model, and neither would TikTok if they bought it. While I agree that they won't and shouldn't, your entire premise regarding business model is wrong.
In the case of TikTok though, it wouldn’t be completely worthless even if every creator left tomorrow. That is because the data TikTok has about its users is still worth something to somebody. Data security is one of the reasons why the U.S. government is looking to ban TikTok. TikTok has a lot of data. And there are many out there that want that data and would pay money for that data. TikTok certainly wouldn’t be worth (whatever it is worth currently) without any creators. But it wouldn’t be completely worthless.
Edit: I think broke your quote when I was trying to quote you. New to the AppleInsider forums. I’ll figure this out eventually, lol.
edit: Looking at the list of acquisitions I may be thinking of Lala.com, which looks like it became iTunes Match. Remember that? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/types-of-social-media
In many ways IMs are more social than others where it's much more of a one-way communication and less of a true interaction, but I'd also say that iPhones, iPads, and Apple Watch are computers that are considerably more personal than the Windows PC ever was.
is Newsmax required to be neutral?
where the hell do you get off demanding the government enforce “neutrality” upon a website YOU USE FOR FREE, KAREN!
The First Amendment permits social media to be as biased as they wish. Don’t like it? Don’t go there boomer.