Apple Invites has Sherlocked party organizing app Partiful

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in iOS

Add another one to Apple's list of third-party apps that it has endangered, as Apple Invites threatens the livelihood of event planning app Partiful.

Two smartphone screens displaying app store pages for invitation apps called Partiful and Apple Invites. Apps show ratings, age requirements, and download buttons.
Partiful (rear) and Apple Invites on the App Store



It happens so often that there is a name for it, based on one of the earliest examples of Apple releasing an app or a feature to compete with a third-party rival. Developers know it as Sherlocking, and they know very well that it can be the end of their business.

With a glass half-full kind of view, though, there is a way to argue that Apple producing an app to rival yours will actually grow the market. There is even some logic to that, in two ways.

First, Apple will always promote something just about infinitely more and better than any small developer can. So it will make more people aware of, in this case, party or event planning.

Then it's also true that Apple will only go so far in its apps. Apple apps tend to be very good -- although Apple Invites is a bit shaky -- yet they are never the most powerful option.

Apple Reminders, for instance, is an exceptionally well-made To Do app, but nobody will ever downgrade to it from Things 3, Todoist, or OmniFocus. Apple Calendar is excellent, but there's still a strong market for the much more feature-rich Fantastical.
Partiful isn't as well known by iPhone users as the likes of Fantastical or OmniFocus, but it's also considerably newer than those. While the company was founded as a website in 2020, it wasn't until 2024 that it launched either an iOS or an Android app.

Even so, Partiful's developers have been critical of Apple's launching Apple Invites.

just reviewing the apple developer guidelines pic.twitter.com/HohuNn0YoM

-- Partiful (@partiful)



What may make Apple's move more painful is that even if you hadn't noticed Partiful's launch, Apple had. Apple included it as one of its 2024 Cultural Impact Finalists, although it didn't then win.

Still, even before its iOS launch, Partiful was boasting millions of users, according to The Washington Post. So it's a success and now Apple has come along to spoil things.

Inevitable development



As with practically all incidents of Apple Sherlocking apps, though, there is a further argument that it was inevitable. It's an argument that goes right back at the start when Apple had a search app actually called Sherlock.

After Apple released Sherlock, a third-party developer created an add-on called Watson, which gave the app more features. Apple did then incorporate those features and that did then kill off Watson, but they were obvious search features that Sherlock would surely have gained anyway.

With Partiful, what Apple has really done is leverage its existing services. Apple Invites uses Apple Maps and Apple Music, plus Messages and Mail, to create and manage events.

It's peculiar that you have to actively tell it to add your event to your calendar, but otherwise Apple Invites is tightly integrated into Apple's services. It makes good use of what Apple users already have and arguably, it's an obvious extension of Apple Calendar.

In fact, it's so obvious an extension of Apple Calendar that there are elements of Apple Invites that compete with Fantastical's scheduling features. It's just also so obvious an extension of Calendar that it should be in that app.

As a standalone event app, Apple Invites is a clearer competitor to Partiful. Apple can't touch that app for its Android version, or at least it hasn't tried, and its reported millions of users are likely to stick with Partiful for its features and familiarity.

But there will unquestionably be users who might have tried Partiful, who now won't. And that's the kind of Sherlocking that gives Apple a bad reputation in this space.

Mid-cycle Sherlocking



One surprise about Partiful being Sherlocked by Apple Invites is the timing of it. While it announced its Apple Sports app, which at least tries to Sherlock some other sports apps, in February 2024, it usually waits until WWDC in June.

So Journal was announced at WWDC 2023 and clearly Sherlocked Day One. Password managers such as 1Password and LastPass saw Apple muscling in with Passwords after WWDC 2024.

Email draft to Professor Hanley with suggestions for further reading on the Restoration period, visible proofreading tool indicating 11 changes.
Apple Intelligence's Writing Tools arguably Sherlock Grammarly



LastPass, 1Password and even Day One have continued and appear to have held on to customers. But even amongst AppleInsider staff, Grammarly has taken a beating with Apple Intelligence's Writing Tools from WWDC 2024.

There was no possibility, though, that Apple Intelligence would not feature Writing Tools. As far as AI and LLMs go, grammar-checking is particularly low-hanging fruit.

So you can argue that Apple is just pursuing the inevitable evolution of its apps and OS.

But what you probably can't argue is that it's going to continue doing Sherlocking developers.



Read on AppleInsider

jibjackreidyForumPost

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 14
    Copying popular apps is the de facto business model of the software industry. Just look at video games: pretty much any "genre" that exists is rooted in copying a type of gameplay that was popularized by an originator. And how many LLM AI programs are there currently?
    mike1jibForumPostbyronlAlex1Nwatto_cobra
     5Likes 0Dislikes 1Informative
  • Reply 2 of 14
    hmurchisonhmurchison Posts: 12,445member
    Great advertising for Partiful.  Nothing compels me to use Invites over Partiful.  In the end consumers will choose the tool with the least amount of friction.  Throwing parties is stressful enough. 
    jibbyronlwilliamlondonAlex1Nwatto_cobra
     4Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 14
    auxioauxio Posts: 2,785member
    Anyone in the tech industry long enough learns the lesson that if you stand still for too long (rest on the success from a single innovation), you're dead in the water. Anything successful will inevitably be cloned in time. It's happened to Apple throughout their history too, and the only way they survived was by continually innovating.
    mike1jibForumPostbyronlAlex1Njas99watto_cobramacplusplus
     8Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 14
    It hurts, but it would be hard to name the functionality of an app that Apple could decide to make which doesn’t currently have a counterpart in the App Store. I mean “There’s an app for that” basically says that whatever you think of doing, someone else can already sell it to you.
    jibfolk fountainbyronlAlex1Njas99watto_cobra
     6Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 14
    Evites was doing this long before Partiful. And if I recall correctly, there was a predecessor to eVites. 
    stompyradarthekatwatto_cobra
     2Likes 0Dislikes 1Informative
  • Reply 6 of 14
    This is the first time I’ve seen “Sherlock” being used as a verb. Is this a new Gen Z or Gen Alpha terminology? Or is this an older term and I’m just late to the party? (See what I did there? Late to the party… because… invitation… *cough*.)

    (Also: I don’t live in an English-speaking country anymore, so I’m generally behind on a lot of new English language related things, lol.)

    Edit: Oh. I see. Did some quick research. Not a new term at all. Learn something new every day.
    edited February 6
    byronlwatto_cobra
     2Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 14
    I don't know.  Based on some of the comments in the related threads yesterday, Apple's app might actually push people towards other apps.
    williamlondonAlex1N
     1Like 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 14
    Can you imagine pouring your heart, soul, and finances into developing a great resource, then fighting tooth and nail to get discovered by the masses, only to have the most popular company in the world copy you and obscure your effort,… that’s rough. 

    Apple is supposed to be the ethical one of the much. At least buy them out. Sheesh. If you can spend 3.5 billion on a headphone company, you can buy out a little third party developer to enhance your wares. 
    edited February 6
    bala1234Alex1Njas99watto_cobra
     2Likes 2Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 14
    anonymouseanonymouse Posts: 7,060member
    Can you imagine pouring your heart, soul, and finances into developing a great resource, then fighting tooth and nail to get discovered by the masses, only to have the most popular company in the world copy you and obscure your effort,… that’s rough. 

    Apple is supposed to be the ethical one of the much. At least buy them out. Sheesh. If you can spend 3.5 billion on a headphone company, you can buy out a little third party developer to enhance your wares. 
    So Apple is never supposed to do anything that someone else has done before? Does that only apply to software, or hardware as well? Are the Mac, iPhone, Apple Watch unethical because there were other players in the market when they were released? Is it "unethical" that Apple released Safari, or Pages, Numbers, Keynote because someone was already doing that, or is that ok because of the size of the competition? If it's ok, exactly where is the line about when it's ok and when it isn't? What exactly are the criteria for when Apple is allowed to release a new HW product or app?

    Is it unfortunate for the developer? Sure. but it's no different than any other business where some other company may "Sherlock" you. Being first (or third or fourth or ...) to market doesn't give you some sort of moral monopoly for that product.
    edited February 6
    kiltedgreenwilliamlondonAlex1Nradarthekat9secondkox2jas99watto_cobra
     6Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 10 of 14
    Never heard of partiful until now, never will use them or Invites. Evite is just fine. Capitalism/Darwinism in action.
    radarthekat
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 11 of 14
    I weep for StuffIt.
    williamlondon
     0Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 12 of 14
    Can you imagine pouring your heart, soul, and finances into developing a great resource, then fighting tooth and nail to get discovered by the masses, only to have the most popular company in the world copy you and obscure your effort,… that’s rough. 

    Apple is supposed to be the ethical one of the much. At least buy them out. Sheesh. If you can spend 3.5 billion on a headphone company, you can buy out a little third party developer to enhance your wares. 
    So Apple is never supposed to do anything that someone else has done before? Does that only apply to software, or hardware as well? Are the Mac, iPhone, Apple Watch unethical because there were other players in the market when they were released? Is it "unethical" that Apple released Safari, or Pages, Numbers, Keynote because someone was already doing that, or is that ok because of the size of the competition? If it's ok, exactly where is the line about when it's ok and when it isn't? What exactly are the criteria for when Apple is allowed to release a new HW product or app?

    Is it unfortunate for the developer? Sure. but it's no different than any other business where some other company may "Sherlock" you. Being first (or third or fourth or ...) to market doesn't give you some sort of moral monopoly for that product.
    the examples you give are a far cry from this. 

    Apple essentially ripping off its own App Store partners is the crux. 

    These guys thought it would be a great. And now their oartnrr just basically ended them. Nice. 
    watto_cobra
     0Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 13 of 14
    So we are saying that Apple saw an app published to the App Store 6 months ago in mid 2024, liked the idea, and then developed and released a competing app in the 6th week of 2025?
    watto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 14 of 14
    I used Evite recently and was surprised at how bad it sucked.  The free version forced ads onto the receivers which is gross.   Had never heard of Partiville or Partiful or whatever it was called until this announcement.    
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.