Beats Powerbeats Pro 2 vs AirPods Pro 2 compared: A personal audio upgrade

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in General Discussion edited February 12

The Beats Powerbeats Pro 2 have finally been upgraded, bringing with it heart rate monitoring and active noise cancellation for the first time. Here's how they fare compared against Apple's identically-priced AirPods Pro 2.

Orange Beats earphones and white AirPods Pro in open charging cases on a grid-patterned background.
Beats Powerbeats Pro 2 [left], Apple AirPods Pro 2 [right]



The Beats Powerbeats Pro have always had a place as one of the premium earphone options on Apple's roster. However, as time pressed onward, other earphones in the Apple and Beats ranges started to overtake it with features.

In Feburary 2025, Beats finally made some big changes to the Powerbeats Pro. The second-gen model offers a thinner appearance, while still catering towards the fitness crowd.

The changes weren't just cosmetic, as Beats also brought Active Noise Cancellation to the Beats Powerbeats Pro 2, a much-needed premium audio feature.

Furthermore, Beats also added a very unique feature in personal audio: heart rate tracking. This is something that Apple has been rumored to be working on, but has actually become a reality via Beats.

With the additional premium changes, the Beats Powerbeats Pro 2 are now the high-end option in the Beats roster. They also directly compete against Apple's own AirPods Pro 2, with the two models priced identically at $249.

This is the specification breakdown between Beats' newest offering and Apple's top of the personal audio pile.

Beats Powerbeats Pro 2 vs AirPods Pro 2 - Specifications


SpecificationsBeats Powerbeats Pro 2AirPods Pro 2
Price$249
Best sale price
$249
Best sale price
Weight (ounces)0.30 (earbud)
2.43 (case)
0.19 (earbud)
1.79 (case)
ChipsetH2H2, U1 in Case
Active Noise CancellationYes, with TransparencyYes, with Transparency
Audio FeaturesAdaptive EQ,
Personalized Spatial Audio with head tracking,
One-touch pairing,
Automatic switching,
Audio sharing,
Hands-free Siri,
Find My,
Lossless audio
Beats app for Android
Adaptive EQ,
Personalized Spatial Audio with head tracking,
One-touch pairing,
Conversation Awareness,
Automatic switching,
Audio Sharing,
Hands-free Siri,
Find My,
Lossless Audio
Hearing test & aidNoYes
Heart rate monitoringYesNo
ChargingUSB-C, QiUSB-C, MagSafe, Qi
ConnectivityBluetooth 5.3Bluetooth 5.3
Find MyWith noise for earbudsWith U1 & speaker for case
Battery Life36 hours with ANC,
45 hours without ANC
20 hours with ANC,
30 hours without ANC
Fast Charging1.5 hours from 5 minutes1.5 hours from 5 minutes
ControlsBeats logo button,
Rocker volume,
Swipe & Force Sensor
Other SensorsOptical sensor,
Motion-detecting,
Voice accelerometer
Skin-detect sensor,
Motion-detecting,
Speech-detecting

Beats Powerbeats Pro 2 vs AirPods Pro 2 - Design



The most obvious difference between the Powerbeats Pro 2 and the AirPods Pro 2 is in their physical shape.

The AirPods Pro weigh 0.19 ounces apiece, with a height of 1.22 inches, a width of 0.86 inches, and a depth of 0.94 inches.

The shape of the design includes a descending stalk that dips down outside the ear, which is used for control and for optimal microphone placement for picking up the user's voice. A selection of four silicone tips are used, both to secure the AirPods Pro 2 in place in the ear canal and to create an acoustic seal.

The Powerbeats Pro 2 are considerably bigger at 1.8 inches by 1.6 inches by 0.9 inches. They're also much heavier than the AirPods Pro 2 at 0.30 ounces each.

However, a lot of this is mitigated by the design choice to use earhooks. Since the Powerbeats Pro 2 are intended for use in workouts and athletic situations, the earhook is used to keep the earbuds on your ear, regardless of how anchored the silicone tip is in the ear canal.

Purple wireless earbuds with hooks rest on a grid-patterned mat marked with numbers and dashed lines.
Beats Powerbeats Pro 2 vs AirPods Pro 2: Earhooks make the Powerbeats Pro 2 much bigger in size.



This does mean that users of the Beats earbuds can use a smaller size from the selection of five for a more comfortable fit instead of going for absolute security. You do still need that acoustic seal, but you don't necessarily need to wedge the earbuds tightly into the ear canal.

The new models may be big, but they're not as large as the original version. This generation has an earhook that's over 50% smaller than the first-gen model, and there's also a weight loss of about 20% too.

While you have to touch, tap, and hold the stem of AirPods Pro to make adjustments, Beats goes for a more physical approach. Each earbud has a multifunction button at the Beats logo, as well as a physical rocker switch, used for volume control.

This is probably a better option for people working out, since you'd most likely want the quick tactile confirmation that you're turning the volume up and down from a physical switch when in the heat of an activity. Swiping a stalk doesn't really have the same immediateness.

Then there's color to consider. As usual, Apple's AirPods Pro 2 are available only in the traditional white, while Beats has four options: Jet Black, Quick Sand, Hyper Purple, and Electric Orange.

Beats Powerbeats Pro 2 vs AirPods Pro 2 - Features



The Beats Powerbeats Pro 2 and AirPods Pro 2 both use the H2 chip for onboard processing. That means there's an awful lot of similarities when it comes to actual features.

For a start, both have Active Noise Cancellation, which is a new feature to the Powerbeats Pro. Since there's ANC, there's also Transparency, allowing users to hear the outside world, which is handy for the occasional run.

Then there's Adaptive EQ, which tunes the audio to the shape of your ear using the built-in microphones. Both options can improve the sound quality when ANC is disabled.

Both also have Personalized Spatial Audio with head tracking, which is a neat feature for listening to music or watching movies. Lossless audio is also present here too.

Then there's the Apple ecosystem integrations, which are pretty much similar across the board. One-touch pairing with Apple devices, automatic switching between devices, and audio sharing are available in both pairs of earbuds.

A smartphone displaying Powerbeats Pro connection notification next to an open lavender case containing purple wireless earbuds on a grid-patterned surface.
Beats Powerbeats Pro 2 vs AirPods Pro 2: Both can quickly be paired to an iPhone



Hands-free Siri is also naturally available, as is Find My support, but there is a difference here.

The Find My of the AirPods Pro relies on the U1 chip in the case, which means you can track down the case itself using a relatively new iPhone. There is Find My with the AirPods, but it's a more basic offering, though you can make the earbuds make individual noises for the left and right earbud.

Beats does benefit from being a bit more Android-aware, as Beats does offer an app to handle many settings on that platform, while AirPods Pro handle more like typical Bluetooth earphones.

That means the Beats has things like one-touch pairing over on Android, as well as Locate My Beats, listening mode switching, and also over-the-air updates, via the app.

Audio quality is high across the board, with the AirPods Pro using a custom-built drive and amplifier for minimal distortion across a variety of volume levels. Meanwhile Beats uses a custom-developed dual-layer transducer along with a high-output amplifier and a new acoustically-transparent mesh that also holds back liquids and debris.

When it comes to capturing audio, both sets of earphones have three per earbud, totaling six apiece.

The AirPods Pro have dual beamforming microphones, as well as an inward-facing microphone to power the ANC functionality. The Powerbeats Pro have a dedicated voice microphone as well as feed-forward and feedback mics for ANC features.

Both also rely on voice algorithms to improve your audio. However, if you use a newer iPhone, this audio processing can be offloaded to the smartphone instead.

Beats Powerbeats Pro 2 vs AirPods Pro 2 - Health



Both the AirPods Pro 2 and Powerbeats Pro 2 have health features, but in very different areas.

The AirPods Pro 2 offer a scientifically validatedHearing Test, which works with your iPhone to check for hearing loss. It also provides immediate results, which are available in the Health app.

The test can even prompt you to set up the Hearing Aid function, a clinical-grade feature that can amplify specific frequencies for the user.

While Beats doesn't offer this, the Powerbeats Pro 2 does go down the health route in a more literal way.

Close-up of a purple electronic device with visible sensors and components under a black oval cover.
Beats Powerbeats Pro 2 vs AirPods Pro 2: The sensors for heart rate monitoring.



Built into each Powerbeats Pro 2 earbud is a heart rate monitor, using the same light-based system as the Apple Watch, but in your ear. Shining over 100 times per second, the two earbuds can determine the user's heart rate, which can be shared with the iPhone.

However, unlike the Apple Watch, which provides all-day heart rate monitoring, the Powerbeats Pro 2 does so when you're doing a workout. As soon as you start a workout in some supported iOS apps, the heart rate feature will kick in.

This can be very useful in situations where you may not want an Apple Watch, but still want to keep track of your heart rate. For example, sports or activities that require you to keep your wrist free of hardware, such as weight lifting.

Beats Powerbeats Pro 2 vs AirPods Pro 2 - Charging and Cases



The cases used by each piece of kit are quite different, in part due to the vast difference in earbud design.

The MagSafe Charging Case of the AirPods Pro 2 measures 1.78 inches by 2.39 inches by 0.85 inches. Meanwhile the Beats case is considerably chunkier at 3 inches by 2.6 inches by 1.3 inches.

While larger, it's still a third smaller than the previous generation.

As well as bigger, the Beats case is also heavier at 2.43 ounces versus 1.79 ounces for the AirPods case.

Purple wireless earbuds with ear hooks in an open matching case, resting on a gridded cutting mat.
Beats Powerbeats Pro 2 vs AirPods Pro 2: Beats uses a much larger case, but it also has more battery capacity.



Both cases offer USB-C charging as well as wireless charging support, though the AirPods Pro case also supports MagSafe.

As for battery life, the AirPods Pro 2 can last for up to six hours of listening from a single charge. It's a maximum of 20 hours including the case with ANC enable, 30 hours with ANC off.

The Powerbeats Pro can last for up to 8 hours with ANC enabled from a single charge, or 10 hours with ANC off. With the charging case included, it's 36 hours with ANC in total, 45 hours with ANC off.

Fast charging is available across both models, with a five minute charge resulting in an hour and a half of playback time.

Beats Powerbeats Pro 2 vs AirPods Pro 2 - Similar, but very different



Ignoring the health-related features for the moment, the Beats Powerbeats Pro 2 and AirPods Pro 2 offer very similar capabilities as premium earphones. The use of the H2 chip grants the Powerbeats Pro 2 the premium functionality it has missed out on for years, making it a viable high-end option once again.

Obviously not everyone will want to use such large earbuds with earhooks when there's the smaller, sleeker AirPods Pro 2. The much smaller case of the AirPods Pro 2 also helps things from a portability perspective.

But that size difference affords Beats the chance to outlast AirPods in usage time. Both on earbud battery life and in total with the cases.

However, you also have to consider the heart rate monitoring features of the Powerbeats Pro 2. It's not all-day, but since it activates during workouts, that's the time when it actually matters.

Purple wireless earbuds in an open case on a cutting mat, with a smartwatch, phone, and pen nearby.
Beats Powerbeats Pro 2 vs AirPods Pro 2: Beats has thoroughly modernized its Powerbeats Pro



It's possible that Apple is using the Powerbeats Pro 2 as a test case, a precursor before introducing the same sort of tech in the AirPods line down the road. It's a compelling prospect, but for the moment, it makes the Beats Powerbeats Pro 2 stand out in a very crowded field.

If you're OK with earhooks and the large size, or you're a particularly sporty person who wants music as you work out, the Beats Powerbeats Pro 2 is a very compelling offering as it is, even if you ignore the heart rate monitoring features.

The AirPods Pro 2 will still be the main choice for many consumers. But now there's a very viable Beats option, and it's one that goes the extra mile.

Where to buy Powerbeat Pro 2 vs AirPods Pro 2



Powerbeats Pro retail for $249.99 and can be ordered at B&H Photo and Amazon.

AirPods Pro 2, meanwhile, are aggressively discounted at press time, with Amazon delivering the lowest price. You can find the best AirPods & Beats deals across the entire product line in our Apple Headphones Price Guide.




Read on AppleInsider

Scarletioshub

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 16
    MKBHD 
    Claims that AirPod Pros 2 have slightly beater noise canceling transparency mode. Can you explain why he thinks this if they have the same Apple H2 noise canceling and transparency? 
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 16
    My understanding is that lossless audio on the AirPods Pro 2 is only in conjunction with the Vision Pro. Is that the same with these new Beats?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 16
    Amazing that Apple put the hearing-aid capabilities in the AirPod Pro 2 but not the Powerbeats Pro 2 which is better suited for this (thanks to the ear hook). Shame on Apple for leaving it out of the Powerbeats Pro 2
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 16
    charlesncharlesn Posts: 1,361member
    MKBHD 
    Claims that AirPod Pros 2 have slightly beater noise canceling transparency mode. Can you explain why he thinks this if they have the same Apple H2 noise canceling and transparency? 
    That they share the H2 chip does not mean the ANC and transparency mode will perform the same. There's a lot more involved than just the chip: microphones, microphone placement, software coding, algorithms and even the physical shape and materials of the pods themselves can have an impact. FWIW, I own both the Lightning and USB-C versions of the AirPod Pro 2 and I've found the newer USB-C version--although it's allegedly "identical"--to have slightly better ANC than my Lightning pair. This perception of being better held up in blind-testing, when I had my wife give me one pair or the other without my knowing which pair I had over a number of rounds of tests, and I could pretty consistently identify the USB-C pair. I wouldn't say it's a big difference at all, certainly enough to be worth replacing the Lightning version, especially since the AirPods Pro 3 can't be that far off. But--at least for the two pair I own--the difference was there. 
    edited February 12
    SmittyWappleinsideruser
     0Likes 0Dislikes 2Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 16
    davgregdavgreg Posts: 1,055member
    The Beats are definitely better on the Bike.
    Those colors are hideous though.
    neoncat
     0Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 16
    I put my preorder in today for the Powerbeats Pro 2. Getting rid of old Powerbeats Pro, which I got at the launch. One ear piece was only lasting 45 minutes. Only getting a trade in of $15 but better than nothing. AirPods (even pros) won’t stay in for me,

    I wonder how the heart rate monitoring with work if you have the 
    Powerbeats Pro 2 and an Apple Watch on during your workout. It will be an aggregate of the two?


    slow n easy
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 16
    Hard to believe a review of an audio product has zero mention about the sound!  Like reviewing a car without mentioning how the car drives, or ....   You get the idea.   People spending $249 dont care how it sounds????  Personally I gave up using in ear earphones when exercising.  I have a Koss porta pro wireless without any ANC and it has just the right transparency for me to run safely and they never fall off!
    dewme
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 16
    whodiini said:
    Hard to believe a review of an audio product has zero mention about the sound!  Like reviewing a car without mentioning how the car drives, or ....   You get the idea.   People spending $249 dont care how it sounds????  Personally I gave up using in ear earphones when exercising.  I have a Koss porta pro wireless without any ANC and it has just the right transparency for me to run safely and they never fall off!
    I know! The word "sound" appears exactly once in the whole review. Did they change the speakers at all? Who knows!?
    dewme
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 16

    goog said:
    Amazing that Apple put the hearing-aid capabilities in the AirPod Pro 2 but not the Powerbeats Pro 2 which is better suited for this (thanks to the ear hook). Shame on Apple for leaving it out of the Powerbeats Pro 2
    It requires FDA review / approval. Its absence today doesn't mean it won't be there tomorrow. That said, AirPods which are smaller, commonplace, and less conspicuous, thus well-suited to being always-in and serving as hearing aids. Not so sure that PBs are a good choice for that, although you may want the feature if you're using them instead of your AirPods at the gym (not that I want to hear what anyone has to say in that context).


    SmittyW
     0Likes 0Dislikes 1Informative
  • Reply 10 of 16
    I ordered mine minutes after launch. Even when I get a good fit with other earbuds, they'll fall out at some point, especially when I'm chewing, I hate that. Can't wait for mine to arrive today. Side note: these things seem amazing, what's a product got to do to get a 5/5!?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 11 of 16
    is there an app just to measure heart rate? Now I have to start a run in the nike app to measure…
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 12 of 16
    davgreg said:
    The Beats are definitely better on the Bike.
    Those colors are hideous though.
    If you hate fun/happy things, you can get it in Boring Black™ or Uninspired Grey™ if that suites you better.  :D
    neoncatSmittyW
     2Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 13 of 16
    SmittyW said:
    I ordered mine minutes after launch. Even when I get a good fit with other earbuds, they'll fall out at some point, especially when I'm chewing, I hate that. Can't wait for mine to arrive today. Side note: these things seem amazing, what's a product got to do to get a 5/5!?
    Ugh. Mine was supposed to arrive today, but all Best Buy’s in my area never got their stock. Meanwhile, the Apple Store I can walk to has them in stock. If it wasn’t for gift cards from Christmas, rewards certificates, trade in my old ones, and reward points at Best Buy, then I would have bought from Apple. Odd that Apple does not offer trade ins.

    Probably will drop in price $50 like last time after a couple of months.
    SmittyW
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 14 of 16
    I got mine yesterday, they're great, love them, but no matter how I position them I have green lasers shooting out of my ears, very noticeable, even used them as a night light going to sleep last night. I don't care about the heart rate tracking since I have an Apple Watch, so I turned the heart rate monitoring off, but I could see this being annoying for people, unless I have oddly shaped ears, which I don't think is the case.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 15 of 16
    dewmedewme Posts: 5,929member
    whodiini said:
    Hard to believe a review of an audio product has zero mention about the sound!  Like reviewing a car without mentioning how the car drives, or ....   You get the idea.   People spending $249 dont care how it sounds????  Personally I gave up using in ear earphones when exercising.  I have a Koss porta pro wireless without any ANC and it has just the right transparency for me to run safely and they never fall off!
    The problem with reviewers jumping into the sound attributes is that they can be very subjective. As long as the readers keep that in mind I don’t see it as a problem per se, as long as you always remember that YMMV. If you’ve followed a particular reviewer or group of reviewers, e.g., The Headphone Show on YouTube, and found that your experience were relatively closely aligned with theirs, then their sound quality assessment may be more meaningful to you.

    There are some audio product reviewers who look at the generated frequency response curve and compare it to a particular reference response curve. All of this quantitative data is fine, but keep in mind that your personal frequency response (listening) curve affects the perceived sound quality you hear. Also, your listening response curve changes over time and as you age especially, but also from previous sound exposure to sound at higher volume levels and longer listening intervals. Add to that the physical aspects of your ear canals and head shape for on-ear and over-the-ear headphones, which also are affected by clamping force and fitment. Unless you have a well established understanding of how your ears and brain respond to sound that demonstrates a particular frequency response, even the quantitative and empirical review data may be somewhat meaningless to you.

    I suppose some reviewers, especially those who may or not perceive themselves as being an audiophile, plus all of the physical and audio caveats I’ve mentioned, and other contributing factors, may simply chose to avoid the scrutiny of publishing a qualitative sound quality assessment at all. I can say one set of headphones sounds amazing and another listener says it sounds like total crap. We’re both correct.

    I’m also very concerned about the isolating effects of active noise cancellation in certain situations. People who drive with ANC headphones on are a danger to themselves and to other motorists who share the same road. Walkers, runners, and cyclists who are on or adjacent to transportation networks are taking a big risk to themselves and possibly others. A little common sense, which is increasingly uncommon, goes a long way.

    Long time Porta Pro fan too.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 16 of 16
    I will definitely be buying these. I bought the original when they first came out but I ended up selling them because I needed the ANC for situations where ear plugs are needed. Both AirPods and AirPods Pro don't stay in my ears when mowing the lawn or riding my bike. I currently use the older version of Shure, which are excellent at passively blocking noise and have never fallen out of my ears no matter what. The main issue I have with those is the older Bluetooth design, which means I go out of range extremely quickly.   
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.