Apple's C1 modem tech will evolve, could come to other devices

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in Future Apple Hardware

Apple has underplayed the introduction of its first in-house cellular modem chip in the iPhone 16e, but future versions could be incorporated into the A-series chip, and even M-Series down the road.

Close-up view of an electronic circuit board inside a device, featuring a large C1 chip with an Apple logo.
The C1 chip is speculated to eventually be folded into A- and M-series SoCs.



The latest iPhone model includes a unique piece of tech: the Apple-designed C1 chip to handle cellular communication, replacing the usual Qualcomm cellular modem. Currently seen as simply a way to avoid paying Qualcomm fees for similar functionality, the C1 may herald some big changes to future iPhones and other devices -- including Macs.

A new report from Bloomberg speculates that the technology of the C1 will later be integrated onto Apple's System-on-Chip (SoC) main processors.

While this certainly includes the A-series Apple Silicon processors, this could also carry over into the M-series Apple Silicon chips. Since the A-series was the basis for the creation of the M-series chips in the first place, it makes sense that developments appearing in the A-series will make their way to the M-series eventually.

The A-series is currently used primarily in iPhones, along with the iPad and iPad mini. The M-series, which debuted in 2020, is mostly used in Macs -- but is also the chip in iPad Pro and iPad Air models.

C1 technology to meld into future CPUs



While the C1 cellular chip in the iPhone 16e will serve current needs, it presently lacks some technologies that will come into wider use going forward, such as Millimeter Wave (mmWave) cellular. Support for mmWave is expected in future versions of the chip, and could explain a report that the iPhone 17 won't feature the C1 modem.

Although Apple is said to be working on a future C2 and even a C3 chip, the new report says that the technology will evolve to become part and parcel of future A- and M-series SoCs. This could conceivably bring Apple-designed cellular capabilities to machines that do not currently have it, such as future Macs.

The presence of the C1 chip -- replacing previous Qualcomm-supplied tech -- is part of what helps the new iPhone 16e have remarkable new levels of battery life. The chip is considerably more power-efficient than what it replaces, enabling the iPhone 16e to achieve up to 26 hours of video playback.

This is four hours longer than the comparable iPhone 16, which uses a Qualcomm cellular modem. The C1 will be superseded in 2026 by the C2 in higher-end iPhones, with a C3 expected in 2027 before Apple is confident that its own model will equal or surpass Qualcomm's capabilities.

Two smartphones with visible rear cameras and Apple logos, one white and one black, overlapping slightly against a white background.
The C1 chip helps the iPhone 16e achieve record-breaking battery life.



The new report speculates that the C-series as a separate chip will end there, becoming part of the main SoC for iPhones and other Apple devices. If true, this development would make the technology even more power-efficient and lower cost, making it possible to incorporate cellular capabilities in, for example, the MacBook lineup.

The future's so bright



Portable Mac users have long desired a way for their devices to incorporate cellular technology, going back to the Powerbook era. This would allow the machines to connect to the Internet without having to "hotspot" from an iPhone's cellular connection.

That said, there are potential obstacles in the path: Qualcomm will likely go over the C1 with a fine-toothed comb for possible legal challenges. It's also true that the C1 is just a basic chip providing cellular capability, with much more development and refinement yet to come as cellular services themselves expand and evolve.

Although it will likely be several more years in the making, eventually portable Mac fans could achieve a long-held dream of being able to use their devices to get online nearly anywhere. Between ubiquitous and ever-improving Wi-Fi standards and incorporating cellular connectivity, the C1 chip heralds a lot of potential for a number of Apple's present models, and devices yet to come.



Read on AppleInsider

ALPScarletioshub

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 7
    y2any2an Posts: 251member
    You don’t think that evolving technical standards and regulatory approval cycles - out of Apple’s direct control - would make it smarter to keep the modem separate? 
    Scarletioshubneoncat
     1Like 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 7
    mattinozmattinoz Posts: 2,610member
    y2an said:
    You don’t think that evolving technical standards and regulatory approval cycles - out of Apple’s direct control - would make it smarter to keep the modem separate? 
    The standards all have a fallback or base level of support that Apple might want to add to a large range of devices. By moving that base to the soc they can make the current standard an upsell via standalone additional hardware that could be made by a 3rd party keen to retain some of Apples business. 

    It seems strange mmWave adoption is really poor because its use case is so limited.  It will never be part of baseline or fallback requirements. Apple could just skip it in their own hardware.
    watto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 7
    thttht Posts: 5,905member
    I don’t think Gurman made the distinction, but the general trend for future “chips” will be heterogeneous multi-chip, or chiplet, architectures. CPU, GPU and NPU chips will be on the most advanced nodes, cache and modems will be on n-1 nodes, and ASICs like Secure Enclave, HEVC could be n-2. 

    So, when someone says the modem will be integrated into the chip, it most likely will be in a multi-chip package with silicon bridge chips connecting the chips, like UltraFusion, Foveros, etc. IO chips might be ok with regular busses in the next plastic substrate. 

    So, one of these modem chips can go into an A series and M series SoC packages “interchangeably”. 
    watto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 7
    why the modem chip would optimize battery consumption while playing a video ? you don't need necessarly need a modem to play a video.
    unless it's video streaming, but we are comparing streaming over 2/3/4/5G, WiFi?
    edited February 24
    watto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 7
    why the modem chip would optimize battery consumption while playing a video ? you don't need necessarly need a modem to play a video.
    unless it's video streaming, but we are comparing streaming over 2/3/4/5G, WiFi?
    Presumably the phone is otherwise operating normally when they do the tests for these sorts of marketing statements. So the cellular radio is at least in standby mode the whole time.

    I suspect some of the extra battery life for the 16e is also because of the 20% reduction is brightness compared to the 16.
    watto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 7
    MplsPmplsp Posts: 4,107member
    This article makes a lot of assumptions. Until we can actually test the performance of the C1 chip everything is just a guess - It could turn out to be an absolute dog for all we know.  Assuming the C1 has reasonable performance and Apple is off to a good start, they have a history of introducing 'v1' products that are reasonable but then significantly upping the ante with V2. 

    While the C1 cellular chip in the iPhone 16e will serve current needs, it presently lacks some technologies that will come into wider use going forward, such as Millimeter Wave (mmWave) cellular.
    The utility and availability of mmWave cellular is not a given. It requires a high density of antennae and even then only works with a clear line of sight. From all I've seen it's worth little more than bragging rights at this point. Apple will probably have to include it just for looks but I'd rather have a well-functioning 5G modem without mmWave than a mediocre one with it.

    Ultimately, the big advantage for Apple is the incremental per-unit cost for these chips will essentially be the production cost rather than a per-unit extortion fee that Qualcomm is currently charging. That will make it much more feasible to include them in a broader range of devices. One could even envision a scenario where Apple includes them in all devices, allowing for after-purchase activation in the future.

    watto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 7
    mjtomlinmjtomlin Posts: 2,699member
    why the modem chip would optimize battery consumption while playing a video ? you don't need necessarly need a modem to play a video.
    unless it's video streaming, but we are comparing streaming over 2/3/4/5G, WiFi?

    The specs refer to streaming video over cellular networks.
    watto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.