Jony Ive reveals his iMac design took just three weeks

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in General Discussion

Famed Apple designer Sir Jony Ive has told the BBC about working with Steve Jobs, creating the iMac, and his decision to leave the company to create his own firm.

Ive and Jobs had a close working relationship upon Jobs' return to Apple.
Ive and Jobs had a close working relationship upon Jobs' return to Apple.



Sir Jony Ive has appeared on BBC Radio's "Desert Island Discs" show in the UK, where a celebrity recounts their life alongside the music that matters most to them. Six years after leaving Apple, he spoke to presenter Lauren Laverne about his time there and why he created his own firm called LoveFrom.

Ive explained that linking both companies was how he saw design -- and also designers. "Every single made object, to me, I see is an ambassador of the people who made it," he said.

"[Design] gives you such a clear idea about what motivated them, what their values are," he added, giving as an example the Macintosh. He said that computer immediately conveyed the attitudes of its designers, giving Ive "a sense of their joy and exuberance in making something they knew was helpful."

Ive began work at Apple with the Newton MessagePad, which was made before Steve Jobs returned to the company. Then when Jobs came back, "immediately there was a connection that was so powerful and so strong."

The two immediately began working on the iMac, a product that had to become a hit because "we were within days of becoming bankrupt, literally days." Ive also described designing the iMac, saying "we did that in the first two or three weeks."

Leaving Apple



Despite his evident pride in his work at Apple, and how important his friendship with Steve Jobs had been there, he said it wasn't a difficult decision to leave.

"I mean it was not a difficult decision, it was a difficult transition having been at Apple for nearly 30 years, and I feel so much of me was there and so much of there was me," he said. "It was just the right time, I think as a team, I think we'd finished a lot of the things that we'd been working on for a long time."

Ive's music choices on the show were chiefly British hits from his youth, including tracks by The Police, Simple Minds, and Bananarama. He also picked "Defined Dancing" by Thomas Newman from the WALL-E soundtrack, and a secret recording of his then five-year-old son Harry singing, recorded on Ive's iPhone.

The episode of Desert Island Discs with Sir Jony Ive can be replayed on demand now from the BBC's Sounds page. It will also be available on the Desert Island Discs podcast starting in early March.

Ive's LoveFrom firm's best known works include the 2023 redesign of UK charity Comic Relief's famous Red Nose, and a $60,000 turntable for Scottish hi-fi pioneers.



Read on AppleInsider

Scarletioshub

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 10
    Yes, apart from Jony Ive's deep, monotone voice, it was a very interesting listen. I didn't like his choice of music, other than the recording of his 5 year old son (a first of Desert Island Discs), but that is what Desert Island Discs is all about. Discovery!

    I very much got the impression that once Steve Jobs died, Jony Ive had to leave Apple. Steve and Jony were close friends, co-mentors and collaborators. Tim Cook is only a logistics guy and resented the power that Jony Ive had at Apple - equal with the ceo. As the Jim Reeves' song goes, "He'll Have to Go". 

    I am sure that Steve Jobs would have been in two minds as to his preferred successor - Tim Cook or Jony Ive. I think he made the wrong decision. 
    edited February 24
    coolfactordavScarletioshub
     1Like 2Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 10
    Follow the link to the $60,000 turntable. If you dig around on the site, you realize that Ive's contribution was a) a lid with a nice hinge (the normal models--still costing thousands or tens of thousands of dollars--don't include a lid) and b) a nifty power button. What I find shocking, is that none of the new models (even ones costing over $30,000) include either of these options. You can "build your own" turntable with things like $4,000 machined aluminum brackets (which look like they could be machined for $20 or much, much less), but you can't add a lid or get the cool button. (Comments about Apple's design and pricing decisions omitted.)

    I am exceptionally appreciative of the design ethos that Ive (and Jobs, obviously) brough to Apple, but I'm very glad that Cook is running the show. 
    dewmedavwatto_cobra
     3Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 10
    If Ive ran Apple we'll get minimalist designs with minimal functionality, like the weird early ways we charged the Apple Pencil, its lack of an eraser, hockey puck mouse, flipping a mouse over to charge it. Ive tends to lean more on looks than functionality, he rarely balances the two. But I do love the focus on quality, some of my favorites are the Apple Cube and its monitor, original iMac, desk lamp iMac, and original MacBook Air.
    watto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 10
    Everyone agrees that Sir Johnny is one of the most relevant industrial designer of the era, however, it’s necessary that we comment on his most disgusting blunder, his “Achille’s heel” so to speak: the lousy laptop power adapter’s cable joint.
    watto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 10
    timmillea said:
    ... I am sure that Steve Jobs would have been in two minds as to his preferred successor - Tim Cook or Jony Ive. I think he made the wrong decision. 
    I don't think Tim Cook was the wrong choice. Jonny is a design guy, not a desk jockey numbers guy. Tim has learned to pass the reigns to a wide array of people that give great presentations, but nobody will EVER match Steve Job's down-to-Earth presentation style. Oh, how he's missed!
    jeffharriscitpekswatto_cobra
     3Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 10
    dewmedewme Posts: 6,005member
    I don't believe that Jony Ive would have been a better CEO than Tim Cook. I don't buy into the notion that career success for any high achiever should be based on how far they ascend up the c-suite pinnacle that culminates at CEO. Jony Ive reached the pinnacle of his career on a different path than the one that leads to a business CEO. His peak is no less important or less valuable to the massive level of success that Apple has been able to achieve than is Tim's success as CEO. Steve picked the right guy. 
    jeffharrismuthuk_vanalingamcitpekswatto_cobra
     4Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 10
    No denying that Jonny Ive's design vision was a tremendous contributor to Apple's success.  But it had run its course.  How much thinner and how much more minimalist can Apple's devices get?  You know that the limit has been reached when we had the bendy phone and the disastrous butterfly keyboard that they eventually had to abandon. When form starts to be at cross purposes with function, that's a sign that you didn't get the form right.

    Ive knew it was time to go or he would die of boredom.  He pushed Apple design to the limits that hardware tech and materials science can reasonably allow.  Any major advances in design at this point are dictated by what the engineers who design and build the components and materials can come up with.

    As to the assertion that Ive would have been a better choice than Cook for CEO: To be silent about that opinion is to be kind.
    edited February 24
    muthuk_vanalingamcitpekswatto_cobra
     3Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 10
    Marvinmarvin Posts: 15,554moderator
    timmillea said:
    Yes, apart from Jony Ive's deep, monotone voice, it was a very interesting listen. I didn't like his choice of music, other than the recording of his 5 year old son (a first of Desert Island Discs), but that is what Desert Island Discs is all about. Discovery!

    I very much got the impression that once Steve Jobs died, Jony Ive had to leave Apple. Steve and Jony were close friends, co-mentors and collaborators. Tim Cook is only a logistics guy and resented the power that Jony Ive had at Apple - equal with the ceo. As the Jim Reeves' song goes, "He'll Have to Go". 

    I am sure that Steve Jobs would have been in two minds as to his preferred successor - Tim Cook or Jony Ive. I think he made the wrong decision. 
    I liked his music choices, nice to see some Bananarama appreciation.

    There are always 'what if' scenarios people think about but the reality would have been very different.

    "interviewer: Why was it time to go?
    Jony: If there's one thing that's inevitable, it's that we do go, the question is just when. It was just the right time. As a team, we had finished a lot of the things we'd been working on for a long time. It wasn't a difficult decision, it was a difficult transition having been at Apple for nearly 30 years.
    interviewer: If Steve had still been there, would you have taken that decision?
    Jony: I can't imagine being somewhere else and him being somewhere else. I would be working with him now if he was alive."

    Steve Jobs would have been 70 now, who knows if he would have stayed that long as CEO. It doesn't matter how much people care about their work, other priorities come up in life like family and taking some time to enjoy the time they have left. Jony Ive has his own family to spend time with.

    People also get the impression that there would have been a whole slew of innovations but there's very little left for them to do that Apple hasn't already done or attempted. Maybe Steve would have made a cooler AR headset but he saw the design for the one they made. More likely they wouldn't have launched it until it was more refined. Maybe they would have been able to manufacture a car, maybe not.

    When it comes to running a company like Apple, it is a publicly-owned company. This is a bad company structure for people like Steve Jobs and Jony Ive because they are beholden to someone else whose motivation is profit rather than an ideal. Jony Ive would hate running a company that had to answer to finance people like Blackrock and Vanguard, people who are so cynical about the value of their work beyond marketing. He is much better off running his own company and he can always take design jobs for Apple if he wants to while being able to work on a much broader range of products and materials.

    He clearly misses having someone who has the unique ability to appreciate good design while being able to follow it through on production without compromise. Steve Jobs was one of a kind but journeys don't last forever, they followed it through to the end.
    dewmemangakattenwatto_cobra
     3Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 10
    Ive and Jobs complemented each other; checks and balances.

    We have an idea of what Ive produced without Jobs to push back, or any interference (from Cook, who knows to stay in his lane) -- the butterfly keyboard, hidden ports, etc.

    Since Ive's departure, Apple products have rediscovered a sense of practicality, with functional keyboards, accessible ports, and other design decisions that might not be as elegant, but more functional.

    Cook was Jobs' anointed successor, and while he expected them to work together, the way the prior relationship worked was not going to be repeated.  Different people, different strengths, and he urged Cook to do it his way.  Agree or not with that way, Apple is a larger, more successful company than when Jobs ran it.  I think he'd be pleased, since he was at heart a businessman with design sense, not a designer or engineer per se.

    I doubt Ive would be nearly as adept with not just the numbers, and day to day facets of running a business, but navigating the minefields of dealing with regulators, politics, and doing it deftly, putting the company first, but not in a obviously crass, capitalistic way, even if that's still the goal.  The company is no different than other corporate giants in the way it acts in many ways, but it operates with a teflon-like shield helps it shed controversies that others can't escape.  Tim Apple could also be a good negotiator or diplomat.
    muthuk_vanalingamdewmewatto_cobra
     3Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 10 of 10
    With some of apples recent designs becoming a bit less apple-like, and more PC style, like the small iMac and Watch ultra, would be great to see apple hire lovefrom again to develop a new lineup of industrial designs with the thermal headroom specs from the hardware team. Ive has a way of taking what seems impossibly complex and turning it into something beautifully simple, while performing at the top. 

    People seem to only remember the less than stellar issues like the butterfly keyboard (which was a hardware team failure. Not an Ive one) or the touchbar MacBook Pro (the failure of the Touch Bar resting on the software team doing nothing with it-and the failure of the thinness of the laptop due to the entire board expectingg Intel to keep to its roadmap.) but an Ive Miss was an especially rare thing. For someone who had home run after grand slam after touch down, etc. etc. etc. the dude gets some strange hate. His first iMac took the world by storm and literally saved Apple. His iPod turned apple into a cultural icon. His laptop designs are still copied by everyone -most egregiously Microsoft’s copilot series - and set the stage for what laptops should look and work like. His iPhone revolutionized the industry snd chsnged what a mobile phone could be. The design was so good thst EVERYONE copied it shamelessly -and still do. His iPad did the same thing for tablets. His Mac mini transformed the UMPC, yet did so with elegance all others lacked. His power Mac g5 and 2019 Mac Pro took thermal management to new heights and looked dang good doing it. His watch revolutionized the wearables market. Etc etc. the dude is a wonder machine. 

    Cook is a fantastic manager. But Apple is indeed a lot less without Ive. It was inevitable. Takes a team to do that much good with that kind of greatness. We had Steve the visionary with Ive bringing that to life. Then we had cook and Ive, the grrat tactician who knew how to maximize the potential of Ive’s creations. 

    And now we have the tactician with a new design team, smart enough to keep Ive’s design ethos and style while adapting to new parameters. It’s good enough. The new Mac mini is pretty cool. The Mac Studio is good, the laptops are pretty dang awesome actually. The studio display is beautiful, if not groundbreaking in functionality, the watch ultra could be refined a bit, the little iMac needs some help with the bezel and the power supply (if it must be outside, can’t you guys do like the laptops and pack it in the plug so it doesn’t plop on the floor? Seriously?) and the laptops, iphone and iPad have probably reached a design point to where there’s not much else to do - it’s perfect. And the best thing is to not mess with it outside of thinner bezels, thin/thick chassis, and folkways. 

    Ive didn’t just revolutionize industries and bring apple into success, he set Apple up for continued success abrought such iconic maturation to industrial design that very little if anything would need to be changed for a very long time. In short, he turned Apple into Porsche, the design reached such perfection, it could hardly ever change and remain to peinnavle of that design. 

    Now that’s a legacy. Unmatched. 
    watto_cobraTRAG
     2Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.