iPhone Air was almost portless, but concerns about EU regulations prevented it

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in iPhone

Apple had originally planned to make the iPhone 17 Air the first completely wireless model, but has apparently changed its mind on that front.

The future iPhone Air was originally planned to rely on wireless charging only.
The future iPhone Air was originally planned to rely on wireless charging only.



A new report claims that Apple considered making one of its future iPhones completely port-free. The thinner model, for now called the iPhone 17 Air, could have gone without a USB-C port -- but Apple has since backed off the idea.

Ultimately, Apple is said to have decided to include a USB-C port for charging after all. This is said to have been done to appease potential concerns from European Union regulators.

The weekly Power On newsletter from Bloomberg suggests on Sunday morning that Apple originally had bigger plans for the alleged iPhone Air, at one point testing a thinner model with a 6.9-inch screen. This was withdrawn for fears of the product being too easy to bend.

Apple has long sought to find a balance between a thinner and lighter iPhone while avoiding making the device too vulnerable to damage. Apple was criticized when it received reports in 2014 that the iPhone 6 Plus could be bent when stored in a tight pocket.

Apple has allegedly settled on a design for the iPhone Air that features a 6.6-inch screen. This would be roughly two millimeters thinner than the current iPhones -- reducing its thickness by about a fifth.

Despite the reduced mass, and design compromises, the iPhone Air is likely to have few sacrifices. It should boast around the same battery life as similar iPhone models thanks to a new battery design.

The thinner and lighter iPhone Air is expected to make its debut as part of the iPhone 17 lineup in fall 2025.

Rumor Score: Possible

Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 17
    hal301hal301 Posts: 6member
    Even if it has a USB-C port, if it is physically constructed only for power delivery and not for data transfer, it could be touted as a security feature.
    SmittyWwatto_cobra
     2Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 17
     :o 
    hmmmm, strange thought…

    The EU needs to back off. I am all for regulation, especially when it comes to consumer protection, but what the truck do they believe is the end game for all their frivolous actions ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 
    iOS_Guy80tiredskillsSmittyWentropyswatto_cobra
     4Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 17
    avon b7avon b7 Posts: 8,218member
    Apple can go portless if it wants.

    If there are reservations about EU regulations and they feel it would be problematic then all they have to do is not release it in the EU or release with a port. 

    That said, the common charging initiative might reach other markets and eventually lead to the same doubts.

    I definitely wouldn't get a phone that could only charge wirelessly if it was limited to current conductive charging. 
    muthuk_vanalingamtiredskillswatto_cobra
     2Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 17
    yyzguyyyzguy Posts: 57member
    darbus69 said:
     :o 
    hmmmm, strange thought…

    The EU needs to back off. I am all for regulation, especially when it comes to consumer protection, but what the truck do they believe is the end game for all their frivolous actions ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 
    I’m glad the EU forced a standard charging port.   I think the only reason Apple didn’t move from Lightning to USB C sooner is so customers wouldn’t get angry like they did with the switch from the original 30 Pin to Lightning.  Had they done so after just 5 years of Lightning every would say it was planned obsolescence.  I’ll go one step further and say they would have embraced USB-C instead of Lightning had it existed at the time.   The reversible connector was brilliant compared to micro USB.   I recently stayed at a place that had an old JBL speaker with 30 pin connector and no Bluetooth!
    SmittyWwatto_cobra
     1Like 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 17
    M68000m68000 Posts: 932member
    Such a non issue,  the port and speakers are on the bottom which is the least looked at part of iPhone or other phones for that matter.  Keep the port!  Options are good and the port gives options.
    SmittyWwatto_cobra
     1Like 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 17
    netroxnetrox Posts: 1,547member
    Why would they think it's a good idea to remove port when it can be used for high speed data or recharging more efficiently? 


    williamlondoneriamjhwatto_cobra
     2Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 17
    netrox said:
    Why would they think it's a good idea to remove port when it can be used for high speed data or recharging more efficiently? 


    Thinner phone (as the article says). If you have a USB-C port, then the device (of course) needs to be at least as thick as a USB-C port.

    If you look at the recently released Oppo Find N5 foldable, it’s basically as thin as it can possibly be. (Specifically: the half with the USB-C port is basically as thin as it can possibly be.) It’s just ever-so-slightly thicker than a USB-C port. The only way to go meaningfully-thinner would be forgo the USB-C port entirely.

    If this iPhone is specially suppose to be the thin phone (that’s the reason why it is being made), then removing the port will help to accomplish that goal. 
    edited March 17
    SmittyWwatto_cobra
     2Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 17
    avon b7avon b7 Posts: 8,218member
    netrox said:
    Why would they think it's a good idea to remove port when it can be used for high speed data or recharging more efficiently? 


    Thinner phone (as the article says). If you have a USB-C port, then the device (of course) needs to be at least as thick as a USB-C port.

    If you look at the recently released Oppo Find N5 foldable, it’s basically as thin as it can possibly be. (Specifically: the half with the USB-C port is basically as thin as it can possibly be.) It’s just ever-so-slightly thicker than a USB-C port. The only way to go meaningfully-thinner would be forgo the USB-C port entirely.

    If this iPhone is specially suppose to be the thin phone (that’s the reason why it is being made), then removing the port will help to accomplish that goal. 
    We have a camera bump so we could have a USB bump at the other end.  :#
    muthuk_vanalingamwatto_cobra
     1Like 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 17
    While magsafe charging is great - it is slow. Further I prefer to use iMazing for backup and copying photographs to external drives rather than iCloud. By limiting iPhone port to charge only it might be an effort to ensure most people use iCloud for all storage and backup. I hope that future software will expand AirDrop to allow the iphone to be fully mounted on the Mac as an external device to better navigate the file system as you can with iMazing.
    williamlondonwatto_cobra
     1Like 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 10 of 17
    blastdoorblastdoor Posts: 3,757member
    Because I always carry my iPhone in my pocket, the charging point tends to get gummed up with lint. So I never use the physical charger on my iPhone any more. Charging overnight is fine when you have a battery that lasts all day. 



    watto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 11 of 17
    I use a USB-C to ethernet adaptor for testing at work all the time as well as a few other USB-C devices. There is no way I could go port-less at the moment.
    watto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 12 of 17
    macguimacgui Posts: 2,547member
    I'd like to see Apple make a phone that they can't won't sell to the EU. An FU EU phone. But apparently the EU market is too big for Apple to ignore. Maybe they also fear more scrutiny as blowback.

    A phone without ports wouldn't cut it for me. I love MagSafe/induction charging but use it sparingly and not when the phone is much below 80%. The heat generated by the slower, less efficient MS charging is much more than that of cable charging. My phone can (rarely) be down to 40% and cable charging will cause almost no heat at all. I can charge via MS in my car but usually don't. The MS mount serves as a convenient mount only, most of the time.

    A portless phone would be a typical 'how cool is that' product but not much for me beyond that. I do like that newer iPhones have a dedicated Charge to 80% toggle. I like that a lot more than the prior (?) Optimize charging toggle.
    muthuk_vanalingamwatto_cobra
     2Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 13 of 17
    SmittyWsmittyw Posts: 33member
    macgui said:
    I'd like to see Apple make a phone that they can't won't sell to the EU. An FU EU phone. But apparently the EU market is too big for Apple to ignore. Maybe they also fear more scrutiny as blowback.
    Agreed. As much as I want Apple to push things, the timing is terrible for that; politics between the US and EU are only going to get more contentious over the next year or two, and Apple is likely to get caught up in it.

    I'm surprised at all the naysayers here, Apple has always pushed us into the future, and charging ports aren't going to be in it. I was hoping for a portless, perhaps even buttonless phone this year if they could pull off force/capacitive button and haptics. The 'air' moniker is particularly relevant vis-a-vis pushing the envelope. Hopefully we'll get that version in 2026, although now that's probably not going to happen because the focus will be on foldables, so 2027 it is I suppose. 
    nubuswilliamlondonwatto_cobra
     3Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 14 of 17
    nubusnubus Posts: 779member
    There is no EU demand for USB connectors on AirPods or iPhones. 

    The directive states that the requirement for charging is only "if the radio equipment concerned is capable of being recharged by means of wired charging" - https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=OJ:C_202402997

    It would be nice to have at least 1 iPhone without to see if the idea is viable.
    edited March 17
    williamlondonSmittyWwatto_cobra
     1Like 2Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 15 of 17
    entropysentropys Posts: 4,425member
    I am not sure there is a regulatory problem, but if there was, just include a MagSafe charger with a usb c port.

    I would like to see it as an option as a consumer test product. Say limited numbers, pre order only.  Then see how they go.


    edited March 17
    watto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 16 of 17
    mattinozmattinoz Posts: 2,604member
    avon b7 said:
    netrox said:
    Why would they think it's a good idea to remove port when it can be used for high speed data or recharging more efficiently? 


    Thinner phone (as the article says). If you have a USB-C port, then the device (of course) needs to be at least as thick as a USB-C port.

    If you look at the recently released Oppo Find N5 foldable, it’s basically as thin as it can possibly be. (Specifically: the half with the USB-C port is basically as thin as it can possibly be.) It’s just ever-so-slightly thicker than a USB-C port. The only way to go meaningfully-thinner would be forgo the USB-C port entirely.

    If this iPhone is specially suppose to be the thin phone (that’s the reason why it is being made), then removing the port will help to accomplish that goal. 
    We have a camera bump so we could have a USB bump at the other end.  :#
    Why have another bump?
    lean in to the Magic Mouse vibes put the and put the usb c port in to the camera bump. 

    avon b7nubuswatto_cobra
     3Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 17 of 17
    eriamjheriamjh Posts: 1,821member
    I don’t mind MagSafe only for charging but Wi-Fi for data transfer to a phone seems awfully slow.   I always sync by wire.  
    watto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.