NAD told Apple to modify or discontinue certain Apple Intelligence feature claims
Apple's artificial intelligence rollout has been anything but smooth, so much so that the BBB National Programs' National Advertising Division spurred the company to rethink its claims to customers.

Apple's promoting of Apple Intelligence features branded as problematic by BBB's NAD
Apple's had a rough time trying to get its artificial intelligence, which it calls Apple Intelligence, into the hands of its customers. Between backlash over incorrect notification summaries and multiple delays, it seems like Apple can't catch a break.
On Tuesday, the National Advertising Division (NAD) released a statement chiding Apple for dishonest advertising. The division had launched an inquiry into the matter after receiving claims that the company had been promoting features that did not yet exist.
In the statement, NAD called Apple's former "Available Now" claim at the top of the Apple Intelligence page "unqualified."
NAD notes that while Apple rolled out many of the features between October 2024 and March 2025, it had misled the public into thinking these features had been available since launch. It found that "Apple's disclosures-- such as footnotes and small-print disclosures-- were neither sufficiently clear and conspicuous nor close to the triggering claims."

Apple has added footnotes pointing out which features are not yet available
Additionally, it mentions the Siri debacle, pointing out that Apple had previously included the new, improved Siri under the "Available Now" header. Apple has since added footnotes saying the feature will be added at a later date and discontinued the "More Personal Siri" video demonstration.
In its advertiser statement, Apple stated, "While we disagree with the NAD's findings related to features that are available to users now, we appreciate the opportunity to work with them and will follow their recommendations."
NAD has recommended that Apple avoid conveying the message that features are available when they are not, though Apple has already made the necessary changes to comply.
Read on AppleInsider

Comments
It seems like the hardware (in house Mac servers) and OS software integration with five ecosystems is taking longer particularly with the transition from the M2/M3 Ultra processor to the M5 Ultra processor.
https://www.iclarified.com/96865/apples-m5-ipad-pro-enters-advanced-testing-for-2025-launch-gurman
Apple did comply with the request and removed the text in question (which had a tiny footnote) without admitting guilt. But leaving it up would probably attract more scrutiny and subject Apple to more class-action lawsuits.
You really don't want to ignore the Better Business Bureau. They are supposed to be protecting the consumer, something they occasionally have to remind companies about.
Most of the new features in iOS 18 have already been deployed and iOS 18.5 betas aren't showing much in the way of major new functionality. In less than two months, Apple's attention will pivot at WWDC 2025 to iOS 19 and iOS 18 will go into maintenance mode, a release that ended up being far less than what was set up in early announcements. Both Apple and NAD probably know that major new Apple Intelligence features won't be arriving until fall 2025 at the earliest.
I don't need Apple to socialize with me (even though I occasionally chat with the random Apple engineer at local watering holes). I do need Apple to deliver functional and reliable software that prioritizes my privacy and data security. Apple's software QA has declined dramatically over the past ten years (I now typically upgrade Apple operating systems in June, about nine months after launch) so I can maintain relative reliability because Apple doesn't deliver that anymore at launch.
Apple Marketing can talk all they want but Engineering needs to walk the walk. This didn't happen in iOS 18 or Sequoia.
Priority notifications came and was partially turned off as it wasn't ready for prime time. AI summaries in Messages are just plain wrong 50% of the time.
The genmojis don't come close to the ones Apple demoed. AI even did and article on this.
Writing tools is useful, but a fairly small fry compared to the others.
You realise you don't *have* to defend every single move Apple makes. You're much more credible if you take them to task when they screw up.