Apple's App Store Guidelines updated to reflect court order over external purchases

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in General Discussion

After a judge ordered Apple to remove all barriers to links and external purchases, the company has updated its guidelines to reflect the ruling while it appeals.

Various colorful app icons, including Hulu, Snapchat, and Duolingo, arranged in an inverted triangle around a large blue icon resembling the Apple App Store logo.
Developers are ready to take advantage of external purchases



It's been a rough 24 hours for Apple, as earnings results were second-guessed by analysts and Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ruled that Apple's external purchase rules were a willful violation of an injunction. Epic Games has also been doing rounds celebrating the ruling, coaching others on how to bypass Apple's commission.

The new guidelines were first discovered by 9to5Mac, highlighting the updated language around external payments and links. Apple promised it would comply with the order while it appeals.

Apple sent an email to developers alerting them to the changes. It seems, at least for now, Apple won't be accepting the Epic Games CEO's peace proposal.

The App Review Guidelines have been updated for compliance with a United States court decision regarding buttons, external links, and other calls to action in apps. These changes affect apps distributed on the United States storefront of the App Store.



Apps are already submitting updates to bypass Apple's in-app purchase system. Companies like Spotify and Patreon jumped at the opportunity to lay out pricing and place external links in their app.

Apple originally avoided allowing external links to purchases that avoid commissions due to fear of lost revenue. This is what led to the judge declaring "Cook chose wrong" in her 80-page ruling.

The following rules have updated sections mentioning the United States specifically.


  • 3.1.1 In-App Purchase: Apps may allow users to browse NFT collections owned by others, provided that, except for apps on the United States storefront, the apps may not include buttons, external links, or other calls to action that direct customers to purchasing mechanisms other than in-app purchase.

  • 3.1.1(a) LInk to Other Purchase Methods: These entitlements are not required for developers to include buttons, external links, or others calls to action in their United States storefront apps.

  • 3.1.3 Other Purchase Methods: Apps in this section cannot, within the app, encourage users to use a purchasing method other than in-app purchase, except for apps on the United States storefront.

  • 3.1.3(a) "Reader" Apps: This entitlement is not required for developers to include buttons, external links, or other calls to action in their United States storefront apps.



It isn't clear how Apple's appeal will go. A lot of global App Store rules are based on how the company operates in the United States, so if the requirements set by the ruling stick, there is some chance Apple will set them as standard globally.



Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 4
    Does this mean Spotify et al's pricing is going to drop by 30%?

    /s
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 4
    mpantonempantone Posts: 2,432member
    Does this mean Spotify et al's pricing is going to drop by 30%?

    /s
    I see you are being sarcastic however the real answer is that it is up to the individual developer to decide whether or not there should be any adjustment to pricing. Some apps may actually get cheaper, other apps will likely stay the same (with the developer pocketing more instead of sharing with Apple).

    Note that Spotify's latest iOS app (updated this morning) now offers an in-app hyperlink to Spotify's website where one can purchase Spotify Premium. That hyperlink did not exist yesterday, just some passive-aggressive language.

    Undoubtedly this will not be the last developer who makes this change to their app. You will have to examine each and every one and compare before and after pricing to see if there has been any price reduction.

    I do know that some Mac app developers have differentiated pricing between Mac App Store downloads and direct downloads from the company website. It seems likely that some iPhone app developers will take advantage of these new payment policies and pricing options.
    edited May 2
    haluksWesley_Hilliard
     1Like 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 4
    mpantone said:
    Does this mean Spotify et al's pricing is going to drop by 30%?

    /s
    I see you are being sarcastic however the real answer is that it is up to the individual developer to decide whether or not there should be any adjustment to pricing. Some apps may actually get cheaper, other apps will likely stay the same (with the developer pocketing more instead of sharing with Apple).

    Note that Spotify's latest iOS app (updated this morning) now offers an in-app hyperlink to Spotify's website where one can purchase Spotify Premium. That hyperlink did not exist yesterday, just some passive-aggressive language.

    Undoubtedly this will not be the last developer who makes this change to their app. You will have to examine each and every one and compare before and after pricing to see if there has been any price reduction.

    I do know that some Mac app developers have differentiated pricing between Mac App Store downloads and direct downloads from the company website. It seems likely that some iPhone app developers will take advantage of these new payment policies and pricing options.
    I don’t disagree, but I seem to remember some companies arguing that the “Apple Tax” made costs higher for consumers and if those companies didn’t have to pay it then they could lower pricing. I can’t recall specifically which companies/who said that, but it was a common narrative. 
    ALP
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 4
    ALPalp Posts: 2member
    Apple will find many clever ways to greatly increase cost for Epic, Spotify, Patreon and other companies that follow their example; while greatly reducing cost for companies that didn’t FAFA... Apple not loosing any sleep over this! 
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.