US officials concerned over Apple's AI partnership plans in China
Apple's potential plan to partner with Alibaba to bring Apple Intelligence to its products in China is raising eyebrows in Washington.
Apple CEO Tim Cook has built good relationships with Chinese officials and developers.
Officials from both Congress and the White House have expressed concerns about plans Apple has to partner with Chinese commerce giant Alibaba to bring Apple Intelligence to China. The company sees such a deal as crucial to remaining competitive there.
A report from The New York Times notes that China accounts for about 20 percent of Apple's total sales. The company will require a partnership with an AI provider in China in order to compete against China's own smartphone companies.
Officials in the US are worried that such a deal would help China become even more competitive against US AI companies. Any agreement would likely obligate Apple to further follow Chinese laws that promote censorship and user data-sharing with the government there.
Meanwhile, Apple is under considerable pressure to boost sales of the iPhone in China. Adding Apple Intelligence features is key to that objective.
The company is expected to launch the iPhone 17 lineup in the fall. It will need to bring its AI features to China as part of that rollout.
US government looks closely at Apple's China ties
Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi of Illinois, the ranking Democrat on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, is among those who have expressed concerns with the deal. He said that there are "serious concerns" that the partnership will help Alibaba collect data to refine its models.
At the same time, Krishnamoorthi insists this allows Apple to "turn a blind eye" to the fundamental rights of Chinese iPhone users.
Alibaba's close ties to the Chinese government are at the core of US concerns. According to Greg Allen, director of the Wadhwani AI Center at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, there is an AI race between the US and China.
Allen adds that there's a view that American companies shouldn't give Chinese AI firms an advantage in this emerging field.
Apple executives have reportedly been contacted by officials from both the White House and the House of Representatives for more information about the deal. They have apparently been asked whether such a deal would give Chinese companies access to user data or advanced AI models.
US officials have also considered adding Chinese AI companies, including Alibaba, to a list of restricted companies that are not allowed to work with US-based companies.
Apple is also allegedly considering deals with other Chinese AI companies, including Tencent, DeepSeek, and Baidu.
Read on AppleInsider
Comments
The world will continue progressing without the USA. Nixon and Kissinger’s visit to China emphasized the importance of global interaction and business. America’s current response is to retreat and blame China, Russia, and the EU. However, this approach will only lead to further decline and backwardness.
Currently, some in the United States (White House) are overreacting due to perceived setbacks. However, the only viable response to challenges posed by China, Russia, and the European Union is to maintain a belief in the principles of mathematics, science, and education not attacking some of the best colleges in the world in the United States.
Instead of seeking scapegoats in the United States or the world, which has been exemplified by the UK’s Brexit approach, it is crucial to recognize that isolating America will only lead to further economic decline and a diminished global standing. China plays the long game and they do it without making a fuss the opposite of the ugly American approach.
See Intel, Xerox, IBM and US Steel for what happens when you retreat from competition and hide into yourself and stop iterating. You can’t hide from competition you have to meet it straight on over time and it doesn’t mean sanctioning, tariffs and the outright bullying, or the denial of science, math, and education when the answers are not what you want you can’t make it up à la maga Trump style.
It's now 2025 and ALL of China's semiconductor plans (which were put on fast forward as a result of 'sanctions') are either already showing the fruits of that effort, or are rumoured to do so soon.
https://www.thelec.net/news/articleView.html?idxno=5264
https://www.eenewseurope.com/en/china-developed-euv-lithography-could-trial-in-2025/
https://techwireasia.com/2023/05/the-challenges-of-building-huaweis-next-generation-metaerp/
https://www.techinasia.com/news/huaweis-harmonyos-surpasses-ios-china
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/03/31/huawei-2024-revenue-surges-to-near-record-high-on-smartphone-comeback.html
AI is simply another rung on the ladder here (back in 2019 it was 5G) but let's not forget that AI was already roadmapped in China back then as much as it was in the US before this nonsense really got underway with Trump.
Industry watchers are now almost universally indicating that the US China policy has failed or outright backfired. Especially on technology.
https://www.economist.com/briefing/2024/06/13/americas-assassination-attempt-on-huawei-is-backfiring
https://www.rcrwireless.com/20240819/analyst-angle/kagan-years-after-us-ordered-them-out-huawei-is-stronger-than-ever
As a result, we are seeing even more stupid decisions popping up on a daily basis. To the point where the BIS was actually 'live updating' its page on a new (and yet another) ban on Ascend AI processors, this time worldwide, and threatening criminal action against anyone worldwide using them without a US authorised licence. It listed three Ascend chips and even spelt one of them incorrectly! Incredible.
Jensen Huang recently had to go to the White House after taking a $5B charge due to the everchanging US AI chip policy and try his best to explain to the 'hawks' how much US policy was causing harm to the company while also pushing to get Biden's AI diffusion rules taken off the boiler. He had to remind them that, financially, they alone stood to lose between fifty and sixty billion dollars in trade. Will we now have to add Apple to the list?
Jensen knows where his competitors are:
"Jensen Huang says Huawei is the 'single most formidable' tech company in China"
"Huawei's presence in AI is growing every single year,"
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/jensen-huang-says-huawei-single-085654497.html
He is not wrong and now Huawei is rumoured to be taking its already extreme manufacturing verticality even further with control over its entire semiconductor stack, from chip design right to manufacturing with everything in between.
That, after going through an absolutely brutal culling of US technology in its products (mostly favouring Chinese companies instead) starving US technology interests of massive revenues.
https://www.asiafinancial.com/huawei-replaces-13000-us-banned-parts-as-it-plots-fightback
If the US weaponises things, expect de-Americanisation to grow as US assets become toxic.
Jensen's words could well have been Tim Cook's. They are both in very similar situations from the same competitor and US policy decisions.
Huawei is now shipping it's Cloud Matrix 384 optically enhanced (zero copper) solutions to customers and is poised to take up the slack left by Nvidia.
https://www.lightreading.com/ai-machine-learning/huawei-pitches-new-ai-cloud-kit-as-nvidia-alternative
Four years ago it was the US semiconductor industry as a whole (representing over 1,000 US companies) that tried to warn of the dangers of restrictions.
Now two senators have written a letter asking for HarmonyOS to be banned too. Again worldwide!
Apart from the obvious extraterritorial overreach that is on show here, the US administration just can't seem take in what it has done to itself.
Desperate times need desperate measures I suppose but no one taking these decisions seems to have understood that the damage was long done (back in 2019). It's too late now. The genie is out of the bottle and isn't ever going back.
Trump used to say China wouldn't progress 'on his watch'. He will probably never fully understand (or admit to) the damage he has caused.
Apple may well end up being collateral damage here and, just like Nvidia, could easily find it even harder to progress in China with these 'persistent headwinds' as Tim said recently.
If things weren't tough enough already with AI, the last thing Apple needs is even more hurdles.