Apple COO Jeff Williams retiring later in 2025, replaced by SVP Sabih Khan

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in General Discussion edited July 9
Jeff Williams has been Apple's Chief Operating Officer since 2010, but he's begun his retirement process and will be passing the reins to Sabih Khan.

Jeff Williams and Sabih Khan
Apple COO transition between Jeff Williams and Sabih Khan. Image source: Apple

Rumors have been swirling about the potential replacement plan for Apple's executives, namely the CEO, and one of the names that always cropped up was COO Jeff Williams. He's been considered
basically identical to Apple CEO Tim Cook in terms of goals and leadership style, though with Tuesday's news, it seems he's no longer in the running.

According to a press release from Apple, COO Jeff Williams will step down and transition his role to Sabih Khan later in July. He will remain with Apple and report directly to Apple CEO Tim Cook while overseeing the design team until his retirement later in the year.

Jeff Williams joined Apple in 1998 as head of Worldwide Procurement, then took over worldwide operations in 2010. He's also been the driver behind the design, fitness, and health initiatives.

"Jeff and I have worked alongside each other for as long as I can remember, and Apple wouldn't be what it is without him. He's helped to create one of the most respected global supply chains in the world; launched Apple Watch and overseen its development; architected Apple's health strategy; and led our world-class team of designers with great wisdom, heart, and dedication," said Tim Cook.

"I am and will always be beyond grateful for his numerous contributions to Apple over the years and his loyal friendship," Cook added. "Jeff's true legacy can be seen in the amazing team he's created and, while he'll be greatly missed, he leaves the work of the future in incredible hands."

Khan is another longtime Apple employee who joined the company in 1995 and isn't exactly young either. At 59, he's only a few years younger than Apple CEO Tim Cook.

"Sabih is a brilliant strategist who has been one of the central architects of Apple's supply chain," Cook shared about Khan. "While overseeing Apple's supply chain, he has helped pioneer new technologies in advanced manufacturing, overseen the expansion of Apple's manufacturing footprint in the United States, and helped ensure that Apple can be nimble in response to global challenges. He has advanced our ambitious efforts in environmental sustainability, helping reduce Apple's carbon footprint by more than 60 percent. Above all, Sabih leads with his heart and his values, and I know he will make an exceptional chief operating officer."

Khan took over the SVP of operations role in 2019 and will be the new COO. As such, he's next in line if Cook ever needs to step down, just as Cook was when Steve was in charge.

Aerial view of a circular building surrounded by greenery, with a vibrant rainbow structure and small pond inside the courtyard.
Apple still needs to announce a CEO succession plan. Image source: Apple

The CEO elephant in the room



However, this transition and retirement lead to an even more burning question on Apple's succession plans. As Cook continues to age in his position, no true successor has been named.

That said, Cook said he'd leave Apple within the next ten years in 2021, so there's still time for Apple to make a public announcement about that plan. Cook is showing no signs of slowing down anyway, as he was responsible for Apple's meteoric rise in his first decade, and seems on track to continue breaking records in his second.

Apple did not share who would be replacing Williams in his roles in the design or other teams he heads beyond the design team reporting directly to Cook. Williams officially retires from Apple later in 2025.



Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 12
    mikethemartianmikethemartian Posts: 1,730member
    So the person in charge of design at Apple is just counting down his days to retirement?
    williamlondonchasmronn
     0Likes 3Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 12
    tiredskillstiredskills Posts: 140member
    2 years younger than Tim Cook.

    Jeff Williams always seemed like a great guy.  Not flashy, just quietly getting the job done.
    jem101Anilu_777gregoriusmmacxpressCurtisHightchasmblastdoorbadmonkronn
     9Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 12
    Wesley_Hilliardwesley_hilliard Posts: 620member, administrator, moderator, editor
    Moderation note: racism is an obvious problem. This is the only warning you're going to get. Do not post racist content or face a ban.
    pichaelchasmnubusbloggerblogiOS_Guy80
     5Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 12
    9secondkox29secondkox2 Posts: 3,669member
    Williams was great. sad that he is going. Never heard of Khan. Guess we will see how he works out in the COO role.
    edited July 8
    badmonk
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 12
    Williams was great. sad that he is going. Never heard of Khan. Guess we will see how he works out in the COO role.
    During a meeting with Tim Cook in Cupertino, Khan reported an issue in China and Tim Cook sent him him directly to China during the meeting. He flew to China without any suitcases
    edited July 9
    williamlondon
     0Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 12
    chasmchasm Posts: 3,778member
    I’ve had the pleasure and privilege of meeting Mr Williams at a MacWorld in NYC some years ago now. I have long thought he’d make a good replacement CEO if, heaven forbid, Tim Cook fell ill or had to leave. He’s exactly the sort of even-tempered executive who can execute at industry-leading standards to have been a good candidate for the CEO job.

    I’m both sad and happy that Williams will be able to pursue other dreams in his retirement, but this definitely narrows the field of possible candidates for when Tim retires. A lot of armchair CEOs here think they could run Apple, but my experience working with a couple of Apple execs on an emerging technology taught me very quickly that being a high-ranking exec at Apple is more challenging than it looks.

    Godspeed Jeff. Ya done good.
    nubusbadmonkronn9secondkox2
     4Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 12
    nubusnubus Posts: 913member
    Those shifting tariffs do put a stress on all levels of the supply chain. Better stop while you can. As all here I wish him the best.

    Kahn took over the SVP of operations role in 2019 and will be the new COO. As such, he's next in line if Cook ever needs to step down, just as Cook was when Steve was in charge.

    No, the new COO is not next in line. There was never a "Cook is COO, he will do" moment. Cook only got the title due to him at the time being the best!
    Same goes for the next CEO.
    bloggerblog
     0Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 12
    blastdoorblastdoor Posts: 3,845member
    For any successful CEO close to retirement, their most important remaining job is working with the board to find successor candidates. Steve Jobs did his job well — he picked Cook. One thing that is especially remarkable about Jobs’ pick is that Cook is very different from Jobs. It would be very tempting to pick a “mini me” as a replacement. For Jobs, that might have been Ive. But because Jobs cared more about Apple than his ego, he picked someone very different from himself because he knew that is what Apple needed next. And Jobs was right Cook was great for Apple in the ten years after Jobs left. 

    But Cook is no longer the best leader for Apple and Apple does not need a mini Cook as the next CEO. So Cook needs to find the right yin to his yang to be the next CEO.


    canukstormwilliamlondon9secondkox2
     1Like 2Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 12
    michelb76michelb76 Posts: 769member
    Curious if there is a shake-up coming, especially now that Meta has poached Apple's AI Foundation Models lead.
    blastdoor
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 10 of 12
    thttht Posts: 6,016member
    blastdoor said:
    For any successful CEO close to retirement, their most important remaining job is working with the board to find successor candidates. Steve Jobs did his job well — he picked Cook. One thing that is especially remarkable about Jobs’ pick is that Cook is very different from Jobs. It would be very tempting to pick a “mini me” as a replacement. For Jobs, that might have been Ive. But because Jobs cared more about Apple than his ego, he picked someone very different from himself because he knew that is what Apple needed next. And Jobs was right Cook was great for Apple in the ten years after Jobs left. 

    But Cook is no longer the best leader for Apple and Apple does not need a mini Cook as the next CEO. So Cook needs to find the right yin to his yang to be the next CEO.
    Gurman already rumored the succession planning last year. Jeff Williams would take over in the short term. John Ternus would take over in the long term. So, if Cook retires in 2026, John Ternus will be CEO according to this rumor. With Williams retiring, maybe it just pulls forward Ternus' training.

    Apple's executive suite has been remarkably stable for nearly 3 decades now. Schiller is still hanging around. Joswiak has been there since the 90s too. Eddy Cue similarly has been there 30+ years. Federighi has been software SVP for 13 years now. Ternus has been a big plus since taking over ad hardware SVP. Alan Dye looks like he will be the design lead for a while.

    CEO of Apple is not a fun job. Unfortunately, Apple is a nation-state level actor, and that means the CEO job is not a "product" job anymore. It's not even a "product strategy" job anymore. Steve Jobs would despise being CEO of Apple today. The major portion of the CEO of Apple today is to talk to, meet with, and to deal with the most despicable people on the planet: politicians, lawyers, dictators. All-in-all, just unreasonable people. Who in Tartarus wants to deal with that everyday?

    Surprised that Ternus even wants the job. No practical person would want that type of job.
    muthuk_vanalingamronn9secondkox2tiredskills
     3Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 11 of 12
    9secondkox29secondkox2 Posts: 3,669member
    blastdoor said:
    For any successful CEO close to retirement, their most important remaining job is working with the board to find successor candidates. Steve Jobs did his job well — he picked Cook. One thing that is especially remarkable about Jobs’ pick is that Cook is very different from Jobs. It would be very tempting to pick a “mini me” as a replacement. For Jobs, that might have been Ive. But because Jobs cared more about Apple than his ego, he picked someone very different from himself because he knew that is what Apple needed next. And Jobs was right Cook was great for Apple in the ten years after Jobs left. 

    But Cook is no longer the best leader for Apple and Apple does not need a mini Cook as the next CEO. So Cook needs to find the right yin to his yang to be the next CEO.


    Perhaps bringing Ive back would accomplish that. Definitely fits the “product guy” and “yin” role. 

    Hard to see Ternus in the CEO role. Williams did seem like a fantastic fit (though I did not like him in the design lead role). Williams was like the genius who would never beat down anyone with his brain. He came across very blue collar, yet wielded the Ivy League intellect. The kind of guy, similar to Steve, to take the high and mighty concepts, tech, and prowess of Apple, and make it feel as comfortable and at-home as your dog curled up next to you on the couch. 

    The little I know of Khan does not strike me as a good CEO successor as far as company product strategy . But he could surprise. He seems better suited to the COO role as Apple endeavors to build out manufacturing and sales ties with India. Not sure how his efforts with other nations have resulted. So he could just be an interim fill-in for Jeff or he could turn out to be a sleeper hit. He’s an ops guy with a mechanical engineering education. But his expertise is supply chain. Just like Cook. It does appear that msnuevering him into Jeff’s place sets him up as the CEO successor, but that leaves me a little concerned that he may end up being “discount Tim Cook” and have the same kind of leadership back to back. Not sure if that’s the best move forward after the current “supply chain guy” leadership.  He has a few years to show everyone what he can do. Maybe after Steve, that’s what will continue the journey? Or is it time for a  product visionary, with the ops guys bringing his visions to life? 
    edited July 10
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 12 of 12
    Wesley_Hilliardwesley_hilliard Posts: 620member, administrator, moderator, editor
    blastdoor said:
    For any successful CEO close to retirement, their most important remaining job is working with the board to find successor candidates. Steve Jobs did his job well — he picked Cook. One thing that is especially remarkable about Jobs’ pick is that Cook is very different from Jobs. It would be very tempting to pick a “mini me” as a replacement. For Jobs, that might have been Ive. But because Jobs cared more about Apple than his ego, he picked someone very different from himself because he knew that is what Apple needed next. And Jobs was right Cook was great for Apple in the ten years after Jobs left. 

    But Cook is no longer the best leader for Apple and Apple does not need a mini Cook as the next CEO. So Cook needs to find the right yin to his yang to be the next CEO.


    Perhaps bringing Ive back would accomplish that. Definitely fits the “product guy” and “yin” role. 

    Hard to see Ternus in the CEO role. Williams did seem like a fantastic fit (though I did not like him in the design lead role). Williams was like the genius who would never beat down anyone with his brain. He came across very blue collar, yet wielded the Ivy League intellect. The kind of guy, similar to Steve, to take the high and mighty concepts, tech, and prowess of Apple, and make it feel as comfortable and at-home as your dog curled up next to you on the couch. 

    The little I know of Khan does not strike me as a good CEO successor as far as company product strategy . But he could surprise. He seems better suited to the COO role as Apple endeavors to build out manufacturing and sales ties with India. Not sure how his efforts with other nations have resulted. So he could just be an interim fill-in for Jeff or he could turn out to be a sleeper hit. He’s an ops guy with a mechanical engineering education. But his expertise is supply chain. Just like Cook. It does appear that msnuevering him into Jeff’s place sets him up as the CEO successor, but that leaves me a little concerned that he may end up being “discount Tim Cook” and have the same kind of leadership back to back. Not sure if that’s the best move forward after the current “supply chain guy” leadership.  He has a few years to show everyone what he can do. Maybe after Steve, that’s what will continue the journey? Or is it time for a  product visionary, with the ops guys bringing his visions to life? 
    Look, I know you didn't mean to, but suggesting Sabih Khan is strategic for Apple's push into India is teetering on racist. Did Cook being white make him better suited for dealing with the EU? Do we need a Chinese COO to help with China? These people are good at their job because of their qualifications and Sabih Khan is likely to be just as effective as Williams as he's spent years preparing for this role under his tutelage. He was likely a prospect well before Apple's more recent push into India considering the guy has been at Apple since 1995.

    And you clearly understand that and weren't trying to insinuate anything. I'm not flagging this as an inappropriate comment, just sharing the mistake you made without realizing it.
    williamlondonsquire.bearing_4otiredskillsronn
     2Likes 2Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.