iOS 26 Message filtering upsetting fundraising politicians that want to annoy iPhone users...

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in iOS edited 9:13AM

Apple will be automatically sorting unknown texts into a new category in iOS 26. That's irritating political groups that rely on donations via spam texts.

Smartphone screen displaying message settings with options for screening unknown senders, allowing notifications, text message filtering, and spam filtering, all toggled on. Background is green.
Messages Unknown Senders filter annoying political groups



Text message filtering based on carrier spam lists and third-party apps have existed on iPhone for years. Apple is expanding this capability and improving sorting with iOS 26, but that could lead to other issues.

According to a letter shared by Punchbowl News, first discovered by Daring Fireball, iOS 26 could severely impact political groups' ability to solicit donations from users. The letter was written by the National Republican Senatorial Committee, which says it could see $500 million lost in GOP revenue.

The letter incorrectly suggests that iOS 26 treats unknown callers as spam, which is a separate filtering category. Instead, it will be treated as "unknown," which it is if the user has never interacted with the number or if it isn't in their contacts.

That said, the system could certainly lead to users missing the texts -- especially less technically sophisticated ones. Unknown texts don't notify users by default, nor do they place a notification badge on the app icon.

There are several settings available that we'll get into in a moment, but again, those only apply to those that know to look or care. The letter isn't wrong in its assertion that Apple's new feature could lead to missed opportunities to collect political donations.

Spam versus consent



The biggest issue I take with the letter is its assertion that it needs to deliver unsolicited text messages to users. These political entities have gone through the trouble of ensuring the laws allow them to text people constantly, and carriers have even allowed the behavior.

Apple's steps to ensure users have some sanity and control over their messaging inbox undercut these efforts. The estimated $25 million revenue hit to the NRSC is certainly not negligible.

However, it isn't Apple's problem to solve. Not to mention, investigations show that a lot of political donation campaigns are overly aggressive, use deceptive tactics, and rely on elderly folks with mental health problems to rake in hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Whether or not these political entities are acting legally isn't up for debate, but their necessity certainly is. Especially when a lot of the texts are mostly attempts to trick people into thinking (insert political name) is texting them directly asking for $20.

The NRSC is just going to have to suck it up and find a new way to get donations. One way would be to let users opt into text messaging alerts and educate them on how to add key numbers to their Contacts app.

Even if Apple isn't categorizing political texts as spam, the behavior of the texts certainly feels like spam. And while these political entities might not like it, I certainly welcome the granularity and control iOS 26 provides.

iOS 26 Messaging app changes



There are a lot of tiny changes to the iOS 26 app that'll make managing messages from SMS, RCS, and iMessage a bit easier. There are more categories than just spam and unknown, plus there are fine-tuned controls in Settings.

Smartphone screen showing a message filtering menu with options for messages, unknown senders, transactions, promotions, spam, recently deleted, and manage filtering. Time is 8:32.
Messages categories are easy to access



In Messages, the top right shows a standard "filter" icon. Tap that and you'll see Messages, Unknown Senders, Transactions, Promotions, Spam, and Recently Deleted.

Transactions has subcategories including Finance, Orders, and Reminders.

Unlike Mail categories, users don't have a way to recategorize messages. For example, a message from Twelve South should be under "Promotional," but it still shows up in "Unknown Senders."

There are some controls available in Settings -> Apps -> Messages. The Unknown Senders section has a few toggles and options.

Screen Unknown Senders is what sends things like political texts to the Unknown Senders category. It's on by default, but can be toggled off.

Allow Notifications has four toggles -- Time Sensitive, Personal, Transactions, and Promotions. If users would like to get notified and have a badge show up on the Messages app icon for one hour, then toggle any or all categories as desired.

So, all is not lost for the NRSC and other political campaigns. Simply educate constituents to toggle these settings as needed.

Otherwise, perhaps it might be a good time to rethink how to get political donations outside of cold calls and spammy unsolicited texts. While it was necessary and worked with previous generations, it likely isn't going to fly in the notification-overwhelmed masses of today.

Apple is right to have these filters on by default and it at least provides toggles. Above all, no one should be relying on unsolicited, incessant text messages to fund a political movement.

It's 2025, get people to sign up for a newsletter. Don't waste time going after Apple for a perfectly reasonable feature.



Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 11
    I don’t know anyone, on either side, that looks forward to getting political text messages. I DO know people that donate to their chosen political party and then are still annoyed that they get texts asking them to donate. I, for one, am looking forward to keeping it the way it is in iOS 26 (and I already use filtering of unknown text messages). 
    baconstangAnilu_777mike1sconosciuto9secondkox2williamlondon
     6Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 11
    MonkeyTmonkeyt Posts: 8member
    As I recall, one of the most controversial "features" of the CanSpam Act was that politicians specifically carved out an exception for Political emails, so that they aren't required to have an unsubscribe feature and can't be reported because of "free speech" rights.  I'm sick of "Get Out of Jail Free" cards created by the very ones writing the laws.
    Anilu_777mike1sconosciutoiOS_Guy80danoxwilliamlondon
     6Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 11
    MisterKitmisterkit Posts: 537member
    How dare iPhone owners be in control of their phone. /s
    baconstangAnilu_777jellybelly
     3Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 11
    baconstangbaconstang Posts: 1,194member
    If you want money from me, that's what email is for.  
    If you send me txt messages asking for money, I'm unlikely to EVER donate to you again.
    Anilu_777mike1sconosciutoiOS_Guy80danox
     5Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 11
    gatorguygatorguy Posts: 24,771member
    Three years ago (or thereabouts) the Republican Party sued Google for employing a similar Messages feature, sending uninvited political texts to the spam folder. I would expect a similar "influence" campaign from them with Apple trying to address the same things. It's tough to ignore the pressure political parties can apply to do their bidding when so much of what the companies do involves regulators and courts. 
    sconosciutodanox
     2Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 11
    Dear Republican National Committee:

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 11
    ransonranson Posts: 103member
    gatorguy said:
    Three years ago (or thereabouts) the Republican Party sued Google for employing a similar Messages feature, sending uninvited political texts to the spam folder. I would expect a similar "influence" campaign from them with Apple trying to address the same things. It's tough to ignore the pressure political parties can apply to do their bidding when so much of what the companies do involves regulators and courts. 

    That lawsuit was actually about Gmail, not Messages / texts, allegedly being biased by flagging Republican candidates' mass emails as spam (but not Democratic candidates' emails). What was funny about that case (which was dismissed by the judge with prejudice - meaning it can't be refiled) was that the systems the RNC used to send the emails did not properly employ DKIM, PSK and DMARC while the DNC's servers did. That is why the messages were going to spam; it had nothing to do with political bias. But rather than just properly configure their email servers' authentication, they chose to sue for the right to use those unsecured servers to solicit donations without getting flagged as spam.
    edited 9:40AM
    muthuk_vanalingamwilliamlondon
     1Like 0Dislikes 1Informative
  • Reply 8 of 11
    iOS_Guy80ios_guy80 Posts: 972member
    Very informative article. Thank you.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 11
    gatorguygatorguy Posts: 24,771member
    ranson said:
    gatorguy said:
    Three years ago (or thereabouts) the Republican Party sued Google for employing a similar Messages feature, sending uninvited political texts to the spam folder. I would expect a similar "influence" campaign from them with Apple trying to address the same things. It's tough to ignore the pressure political parties can apply to do their bidding when so much of what the companies do involves regulators and courts. 

    That lawsuit was actually about Gmail, not Messages / texts, allegedly being biased by flagging Republican candidates' mass emails as spam (but not Democratic candidates' emails). What was funny about that case (which was dismissed by the judge with prejudice - meaning it can't be refiled) was that the systems the RNC used to send the emails did not properly employ DKIM, PSK and DMARC while the DNC's servers did. That is why the messages were going to spam; it had nothing to do with political bias. But rather than just properly configure their email servers' authentication, they chose to sue for the right to use those unsecured servers to solicit donations without getting flagged as spam.
    Ah, you're correct, I shouldn't always go by memory. Thanks for the details. 
    jellybellymuthuk_vanalingam
     2Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 10 of 11
    danoxdanox Posts: 3,890member
    Sounds like a perfect use case for an active AI Agent that screens every goddamn message and every email to (mercilessly) eliminate the ones you do not want to see ever……

    I would call that useful practical AI tech, I don’t care about AI when it comes to drawing social media pictures this however is a perfect example of what useful AI can/could be helping to solve a persistent problem.
    edited 10:55AM
    williamlondon
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 11 of 11
    9secondkox29secondkox2 Posts: 3,671member
    Great article. Hopefully I can get Rob Bonta to stop spamming me now. 
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.