Apple and others back government plan to digitize healthcare

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in General Discussion

Major tech companies are aligning with a federal effort to reengineer how patients access and manage their healthcare data.

Credit: WikiMedia
Image credit: WikiMedia



Apple is among over sixty companies supporting a federal push to modernize U.S. healthcare infrastructure, as announced by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) on Wednesday. Other major participants include Amazon, Alphabet, Anthropic, and OpenAI.

The initiative is part of a broader Trump administration effort aimed at improving healthcare through data sharing and enhanced digital access. According to CMS, the focus is on giving Medicare beneficiaries more control through modern health technologies.

New tools being developed include AI-powered symptom checkers, digital intake systems, and apps aimed at managing chronic conditions such as diabetes and obesity. All participating platforms must comply with CMS interoperability standards to securely access and exchange health records.

Companies involved have committed to using secure digital credentials for accessing CMS Aligned Networks that meet new data-sharing criteria. According to CMS, this infrastructure aims to support real-world outcomes instead of isolated pilot programs.

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., framed the effort as a response to long-standing data barriers in the healthcare system. CMS Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz described it as a necessary shift after decades of stagnation in healthcare innovation.

The government says these changes will "kill the clipboard" by eliminating paper intake forms through digital check-ins. AI tools will also help users assess symptoms, navigate care options, and schedule appointments.

Eleven health systems, seven electronic health record providers, and twenty-one networks have committed to meeting interoperability requirements. CMS expects measurable results from participating companies by early 2026.



Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 5
    rob53rob53 Posts: 3,382member
    I’m all for interoperability but don’t want government access to my medical records. We all know this is what the trump worthless-administration wants so they can locate anyone they want to and see what is happening to everyone in the USA. My doctors deal direction with Medicare, that’s enough. No other government agency has any right to my health records, plain and simple. 
    VictorMortimerdav
     2Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 5
    jpellinojpellino Posts: 717member
    It’s an opt-in system, thankfully. 
    That the announcement came from Oz is concerning. 
    You would have to convince me that the current fed IT systems are no longer under the watchful eyes of some glorified script kiddies before the interop is worth it to me. 
    I’ll be very surprised if the Epics of the med data industry don’t lobby against it. 
    They’re currently charging providers a lot of money for (an abysmal level of) interop. 
    So much so that VNAs, single or small practices, OT and PT shops can’t afford it. 
    HIPAA was the origin of portability (that’s what the P stands for) but that took a (private sector) back seat to the accountability parts. 
    VictorMortimerdav
     2Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 5
    baconstangbaconstang Posts: 1,197member
    All my records have been migrating over to "My Chart" which is pretty cool now that most of them are there and I can easily review them.
    If I see a new GP or specialist, they can be up to speed in minutes!
    byronl
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 5
    rob53 said:
    I’m all for interoperability but don’t want government access to my medical records. We all know this is what the trump worthless-administration wants so they can locate anyone they want to and see what is happening to everyone in the USA. My doctors deal direction with Medicare, that’s enough. No other government agency has any right to my health records, plain and simple. 
    Here I thought that the government already knew my medical records since before I was born.
    VictorMortimerdav
     0Likes 2Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 5
    anonymouseanonymouse Posts: 7,124member
    All my records have been migrating over to "My Chart" which is pretty cool now that most of them are there and I can easily review them.
    If I see a new GP or specialist, they can be up to speed in minutes!
    Yeah, but the problem with MyChart and any other "digital" system is that most organizations are very sloppy with record keeping and that sloppiness becomes pervasive and multiplied when all your medical data is "interoperable". I once spent hours correctly entering data for my wife for a new doctor we were going to see only to have everything I entered completely ignored, but to make matters worse they downloaded everything from MyChart into their system. (Why ask us to enter it at all, one might ask.) At least 90% of what they downloaded was garbage and much of that was outdated at best. But then you have the doctor looking at garbage data and making treatment decisions based on it. And good luck trying to get it cleaned up, no one has the time to spend the hours it would take to go through all of it and separate the wheat from the chaff, so the garbage just keeps piling higher and higher.

    At least with paper, or non-"interoperable" charts, the bad data is limited to what that doctor's staff enters, and it can be possible to fix it. But once you start just taking all this data from everywhere and merging it into one giant EMR, it's hopeless to even try to correct it. We now put all pertinent data on sheets of paper (Histories, Conditions, Medications, Allergies, Surgeries, ...) and hand them to the doctor while telling them that the EMR is not to be trusted, and that only the data they are looking at on those sheets is likely to be correct.

    Another downside of these EMRs is that it's a huge source of Medicare Advantage fraud. Companies that offer Medicare Advantage plans mine this data for every ICD-10 code they can find and bill Medicare for it, even if it's an old diagnosis that hasn't applied in a decade or more.

    The other problem with these EMR systems is that the UIs are not optimized for presenting data to physicians. These appear to be designed by software engineers who know absolutely nothing about medicine or about how to best present information to physicians. Doctors work best, are more likely to spot issues, and get a better understanding of a patient when they have all of the data in front of them at once. But these EMR systems have them clicking in and out of siloed data looking at one bit at a time making it more likely they don't spot patterns and associations. 

    In short, EMRs are a nightmare that no one knows how to, or has the will to, fix, and RFK & Oz are idiots who shouldn't be in charge of managing their own health care, let alone anyone else's.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.