It said previous expectation for speed, not future expectation for speed. I think that means faster than two G4s at 1.42GHz, not faster than a 970 at 1.8GHz.
I mean, I don't want anyone's hopes to be too high.
It said previous expectation for speed, not future expectation for speed. I think that means faster than two G4s at 1.42GHz, not faster than a 970 at 1.8GHz.
I mean, I don't want anyone's hopes to be too high.
You're leaving out 1.8ghz 970 on fast as hell panther. Speed from the processor and the OS.
I think people are missing the fact that Apple will want developers to start writing code for 64 bit architecture and for that to be tested the deveopers will need the right hardware.
Comments
Originally posted by Leonis
2.5GHz 970?
It said previous expectation for speed, not future expectation for speed. I think that means faster than two G4s at 1.42GHz, not faster than a 970 at 1.8GHz.
I mean, I don't want anyone's hopes to be too high.
Originally posted by bauman
It said previous expectation for speed, not future expectation for speed. I think that means faster than two G4s at 1.42GHz, not faster than a 970 at 1.8GHz.
I mean, I don't want anyone's hopes to be too high.
You're leaving out 1.8ghz 970 on fast as hell panther. Speed from the processor and the OS.
http://www.macminute.com/2003/06/17/wwdc
Sounds good to me.
1.43GHz G4 is still faster than what Apple has right now
That's a cheap shot, Leonis!
BUT REALLY FUNNY!
Lemon Bon Bon