June 23rd: special event in Berlin for 970 Powermacs

123457»

Comments

  • Reply 121 of 126
    baumanbauman Posts: 1,248member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Leonis

    2.5GHz 970?



    It said previous expectation for speed, not future expectation for speed. I think that means faster than two G4s at 1.42GHz, not faster than a 970 at 1.8GHz.



    I mean, I don't want anyone's hopes to be too high.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 122 of 126
    leonisleonis Posts: 3,427member
    1.43GHz G4 is still faster than what Apple has right now
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 123 of 126
    kidredkidred Posts: 2,402member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by bauman

    It said previous expectation for speed, not future expectation for speed. I think that means faster than two G4s at 1.42GHz, not faster than a 970 at 1.8GHz.



    I mean, I don't want anyone's hopes to be too high.




    You're leaving out 1.8ghz 970 on fast as hell panther. Speed from the processor and the OS.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 124 of 126
    You probably already know this, but the WWDC Keynote will offically be sat brodcast:



    http://www.macminute.com/2003/06/17/wwdc



    Sounds good to me.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 125 of 126
    Quote:

    1.43GHz G4 is still faster than what Apple has right now



    That's a cheap shot, Leonis!



    BUT REALLY FUNNY!



    Lemon Bon Bon
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 126 of 126
    I think people are missing the fact that Apple will want developers to start writing code for 64 bit architecture and for that to be tested the deveopers will need the right hardware.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.