Microsoft to end IE, Safari needs to improve

2

Comments

  • Reply 21 of 55
    gizzmonicgizzmonic Posts: 511member
    I don't think this applies to Mac IE. Although it's been so long since a Mac IE update, it matters little. Safari and Camino have left it in the dust...
  • Reply 22 of 55
    aquaticaquatic Posts: 5,602member
    Yeah Safari is faster and easier to use than IE. Macs still NEED IE. There is no way around it. And this was unofficial and PC centric but it still does not bode well. Look at how long IE 5 has gone without an update. IE 6 for Mac is a Good Thing?. Competition is a Good Thing?. Identifying your Safari as IE doesn't make it IE.
  • Reply 23 of 55
    jwri004jwri004 Posts: 626member
    It still begs the question



    "who needs IE?"



    Fours months, no need for IE. What high quality porn sites are you looking at?
  • Reply 24 of 55
    drumbug1drumbug1 Posts: 155member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by jwri004

    It still begs the question



    "who needs IE?"







    I agree. I haven't used IE on my Mac (or the PC's at work) since about September. What sites are you people looking at that only work in IE? I don't know of any.
  • Reply 25 of 55
    ghost_user_nameghost_user_name Posts: 22,667member
    I've been pushing the "no-IE" ticket for years. My main browsers today are Safari and OmniWeb 4.5 (sp's). Before these I used Chimera. Before that OmniWeb 4.x and Mozilla.



    After months of non-use on my hard drive, I finally archived IE onto a dmg back in September. I probably hadn't even used it regularly since some time in 2001. I very very rarely encounter sites that actually need IE. I honestly can't even remember the last time that was. Meanwhile, I just keep IE around for testing my own standards compliant code to see how badly IE might screw it up.
  • Reply 26 of 55
    leonisleonis Posts: 3,427member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Brad

    I've been pushing the "no-IE" ticket for years. My main browsers today are Safari and OmniWeb 4.5 (sp's). Before these I used Chimera. Before that OmniWeb 4.x and Mozilla.



    After months of non-use on my hard drive, I finally archived IE onto a dmg back in September. I probably hadn't even used it regularly since some time in 2001. I very very rarely encounter sites that actually need IE. I honestly can't even remember the last time that was. Meanwhile, I just keep IE around for testing my own standards compliant code to see how badly IE might screw it up.






    Actually some sites from Asia-Pacific areas require IE. The jackass in this area are so pro-M$
  • Reply 27 of 55
    bartobarto Posts: 2,246member
    I can't believe that some of you are ASKING for Safari to not just impersonate IE, but emulate it.



    If web browsers start to emulate IE, then web masters will continue to ignore standards compliance. The only way to bring standards back into the web is to have a healthy selection of widely used browsers. Otherwise web masters will continue to code "MSHTML", not HTML.



    Barto
  • Reply 28 of 55
    aquaticaquatic Posts: 5,602member
    Good call barto. (Reminds me of "red box" heh)



    Safari should be as different from (read: better) IE as possible, since we'll always still have IE. Or will we? I hope so. Every now and then sites require IE. For me I MUST use IE daily for my college's webcourses and all class management, like signing up. "Peoplesoft blows" as someone here eloquently put it. U. RI wasted 10 MILLION on some ghetto Peoplesoft program that my friend Dan (www.wonderwarp.com) in 9th grade could have done better on. It crashes Safari like clockwork. Actually to be honest I switched to FireBird as a backup (wow it's fast!) and that works with PeopleSoft. I'm curious now too, what are some sites that require IE? And if they do I wonder if they require just IE or PC IE?
  • Reply 29 of 55
    Quote:

    Originally posted by tonton

    If these three things are fixed, THEN AND ONLY THEN can I give up IE. Otherwise, Safari is MUCH better than IE. Just FIX DOWNLOADING ALREADY!!!!!



    You sound like a perfect candidate for OmniWeb 4.5.



    It has all the OmniWeb 4.x goodies (plus a few new things) as well as the fast WebCore engine that powers Safari. Since you're an IE junkie, you won't be miffed by the lack of tabs in OmniWeb ("yet." something good is coming in 5.0). Since you seem to be a download fanatic, you should go try out OmniWeb 4.2.1 and get a feel for how it works and have a look at its download manager. Important note: 4.2 still uses the antiquated rendering engine and is still relatively slow and doesn't conform to all technologies like CSS and DHTML and other goodies. 4.5 fixes all that.
  • Reply 30 of 55
    bartobarto Posts: 2,246member
    You can always use a specilized download manager, like KGet (hooray for X11, Fink and Liquid!)



    Also, I prefer the simplicity of Safari's download manager. Pause/Resume is desperately needed as is selectable URLs as you pointed out. However, I much prefer Safari Beta with a few missing features than the garbage (speed, standards, stability and interface) of IE.



    Barto
  • Reply 31 of 55
    klinuxklinux Posts: 453member
    I would imagine it is far easier to port Konqueror to Windows than Safari to Windows. Safari is based on KHTML in Konqueror to start with anyway.
  • Reply 32 of 55
    cbothcboth Posts: 16member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by drumbug1

    I agree. I haven't used IE on my Mac (or the PC's at work) since about September. What sites are you people looking at that only work in IE? I don't know of any.



    I tried to print an E-ticket on www.usairways.com Sunday and they would only accept IE.\
  • Reply 33 of 55
    Quote:

    Originally posted by tonton

    I'd really like to go with Omniweb for whatever I can't use Safari for, but there are just too many free browsers on the market to validate choosing a shareware browser. I'm poor.



    OmniWeb 4.5 will have the same licensing scheme that 4.x already has. Yes, it is considered shareware, but it is not limiting or crippled in any way. The only thing you get when it's not registered is the occasional little reminder (and they're usually pretty funny) when you launch the program. There's no forced timed delay with the reminder, either, like there is with apps like GraphicConverter or Pacifist.



    You can use OmniWeb for free for as long as you want.
  • Reply 34 of 55
    paulpaul Posts: 5,278member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Aquatic

    "Peoplesoft blows" as someone here eloquently put it.



    that would be me

    I have to use it to log my hours up at the computer lab I work at up at BC...
  • Reply 35 of 55
    serranoserrano Posts: 1,806member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Leonis

    Slightly off topic.



    One feature that I really want to see in Safari 1.0 is the ability to "emulate" itself and Internet Explorer for Windows. If this feature is included then we will not have to worry about going to some sites that require IE on a PC




    It already has that feature.



    defaults write com.apple.Safari IncludeDebugMenu 1
  • Reply 36 of 55
    bartobarto Posts: 2,246member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by serrano

    It already has that feature.



    defaults write com.apple.Safari IncludeDebugMenu 1








    Sometimes all you can do is laugh...
  • Reply 37 of 55
    I think what people are missing here is not the fact that IE is in bad need of an update ( I am still forced to use it on occasion, for work related stuff, since places where I download photos ) make you use IE, cause their webmonkeys are not smart enough to test it out on multiple browsers. I really don't think they would discontinue IE for Mac just yet, matter of fact - probably to everyone's horror- we need it around for these types of things, or our boss men will come clamouring down on us, stating that Mac's cannot even get into websites. MS does control alot of the format on the web, and if IE were to blow off the face of the earth, 95% of my web stuff would be unaffected- however when we need it the other 5% of the time- it'd be "nice to have." So again-recap- for the majority of my internet dealings, I don't use it. But for some unfortunate webmonkies who don't test their stuff out on Netscape, or anything else- this will ulitimately give us the "need" to have IE..no matter how little we use it. We Lose IE..MS can lengthen the gap on the internet. Proprietary stuff abounds. Should have broken them up.
  • Reply 38 of 55
    soopadrivesoopadrive Posts: 182member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by tommy_thompson

    We Lose IE..MS can lengthen the gap on the internet.



    I can just see M$ laughing it up right now.

    It hurts to realize just how dependent Apple is on Microsoft sometimes.

    Lousy webmonkeys...
  • Reply 39 of 55
    kelibkelib Posts: 740member
    Sadly I can't be without it. At least 3 of my regulars (All Car Sites) only seem to work in IE. Some of them worked in Mozilla until the latest update. The Java based configurators only work in IE
  • Reply 40 of 55
    cbothcboth Posts: 16member
    Being a recent convert to the Mac world I have enjoyed the experience very much. One thing I have noticed with Safari is that it does not accept right click. No reason that it should as Mac doesn't advocate it. IE supports it very nicely and made me feel more at home when I switched.
Sign In or Register to comment.