I just love how the progressive folks here can ALWAYS be on the correct side of any issue. They screamed that Sadfdam would kill hundreds of thousands of our men, and they scream now that we were too successful and he must have been a disarmed paper tiger. It must be nice to live in their self-rightous world.
When someone is as dishonest as you, everyone must seem 'self-rightous.'
No one believed they would kill hundreds and thousands of our troops. You lie here and say 'They screamed that Sadfdam' would do whatever, when it's a flat out lie.
Don't lie. It makes you look bad.
'They' continuously said that Sadfdam wasn't a threat to the United States. It sure as hell looks like 'they' were correct. You don't have the courage to admit that 'they' were right though.
In a moral sense, Clinton lying about WMD to bomb Iraq and strengthen sanctions is "worse" than Bush lying about WMD to bomb Iraq because the ends were different;
that is EXACTLY what "they" said, it was one horror story after another, "just let the inspectors disarm SH---if we attack he might use Mustard Gas on our troops"
...there were special sections on every news web site from USA Today to CNN, chocked full of flash animations, devoted to WMD symptoms, delivery methods, etc., etc.
You can always attempt to justify yourself by the ends. Whether the people will beleive such an Italian city-state doctrine depends on how forgetful they are. *smiles knowingly*
that is EXACTLY what "they" said, it was one horror story after another, "just let the inspectors disarm SH---if we attack he might use Mustard Gas on our troops"
...there were special sections on every news web site from USA Today to CNN, chocked full of flash animations, devoted to WMD symptoms, delivery methods, etc., etc.
Rule #34 in arguments: Try to shift the topic to the enemy camp when your own arguments fail.
Please show the huge number of posts that said it would be difficult for ameican troops to win the war. I didn´t think that myself and really don´t think the majority against the war felt that.
and...that is exactly why YOU GUYS aren't answering Coulter's points!
Would you please distill her points so I know what I am supposed to answer. The fog from constructed points and hot air is too thick for me to see the points from pure rhetoric.
Comments
Originally posted by trumptman
I just love how the progressive folks here can ALWAYS be on the correct side of any issue. They screamed that Sadfdam would kill hundreds of thousands of our men, and they scream now that we were too successful and he must have been a disarmed paper tiger. It must be nice to live in their self-rightous world.
When someone is as dishonest as you, everyone must seem 'self-rightous.'
No one believed they would kill hundreds and thousands of our troops. You lie here and say 'They screamed that Sadfdam' would do whatever, when it's a flat out lie.
Don't lie. It makes you look bad.
'They' continuously said that Sadfdam wasn't a threat to the United States. It sure as hell looks like 'they' were correct. You don't have the courage to admit that 'they' were right though.
Originally posted by groverat
In a moral sense, Clinton lying about WMD to bomb Iraq and strengthen sanctions is "worse" than Bush lying about WMD to bomb Iraq because the ends were different;
The ends don't justify the means.
The ends don't justify the means.
The ends don't justify the means.
The ends don't justify the means.
The ends don't justify the means.
The ends don't justify the means.
The ends don't justify the means.
The ends don't justify the means.
that is EXACTLY what "they" said, it was one horror story after another, "just let the inspectors disarm SH---if we attack he might use Mustard Gas on our troops"
...there were special sections on every news web site from USA Today to CNN, chocked full of flash animations, devoted to WMD symptoms, delivery methods, etc., etc.
Originally posted by Anders the White
She must believe that the two party system is the most representative possible.
This one sentence single-handedly discredits about 20 regulars on AO.
Originally posted by bunge
bunge pulls a the shining
You can always attempt to justify yourself by the ends. Whether the people will beleive such an Italian city-state doctrine depends on how forgetful they are. *smiles knowingly*
Originally posted by ena
bunge, shame on you!
that is EXACTLY what "they" said, it was one horror story after another, "just let the inspectors disarm SH---if we attack he might use Mustard Gas on our troops"
...there were special sections on every news web site from USA Today to CNN, chocked full of flash animations, devoted to WMD symptoms, delivery methods, etc., etc.
Rule #34 in arguments: Try to shift the topic to the enemy camp when your own arguments fail.
Please show the huge number of posts that said it would be difficult for ameican troops to win the war. I didn´t think that myself and really don´t think the majority against the war felt that.
The ends don't justify the means.
As a rule; that's simplistic logic.
Specific to this situation; it's a matter of opinion.
Originally posted by Anders the White
Rule #34 in arguments: Try to shift the topic to the enemy camp when your own arguments fail.
and...that is exactly why YOU GUYS aren't answering Coulter's points!
*sticks tounge out at Anders*
nanner nanner!!
Originally posted by ena
and...that is exactly why YOU GUYS aren't answering Coulter's points!
Would you please distill her points so I know what I am supposed to answer. The fog from constructed points and hot air is too thick for me to see the points from pure rhetoric.
YOU LEAVE ME NO CHOICE......
Hey brother
Ready for Another
Dose of my Yankee Pride?
In the jungle
Ya just might stumble
Onto something that you never tried
Got that right
There was trouble in the east
Worry in the west
Till the wall came tumblin' down
Shift in the sand
Rockets to the madman
Haven't heard a sound
You don't have to worry
Help is on the way
We don't need no "thank you, ma'am"
We know what they're gonna say
(They say) Hey, hey, Damn Yankee
Woh, Oh, Oh, Damn Yankee
(How we doin')
Now I say what I want
And I do what I want
And I go where I want to go
Ain't no strong man
Safe from the hang man
Baby, now, don't ya know
If you need assitance
I'll be on the way
Run into a little resistance
Ya know what they're gonna say
(They say) Hey, hey, Damn Yankee
Woh, oh, oh, Damn Yankee
Hey, hey, Damn Yankee
Originally posted by groverat
As a rule; that's simplistic logic.
Specific to this situation; it's a matter of opinion.
Everything's a matter of opinion. It was Harry Truman's opinion that a big f-ing A-bomb was better than a ground war.
Rule #78 in arguments: When you are losing start singing/rapping.
Cogratulations. Have a beer on me
Originally posted by groverat
I don't like Coulter, but she makes a few good points that you guys continually ignore and asks questions you guys continually refuse to answer.
I asked Ena to post her points that he wanted answered but then hegan to sing a song instead....
Originally posted by Anders the White
I asked Ena to post her points that he wanted answered but then hegan to sing a song instead....
He/she was just following the rules.
Originally posted by ena
ena shows his ear drum bursting red white blue pride
You call that signing. Y'all a bunch o' lazy off key moma's boys. Get back to your barracks, one two, one two...
I got this link from a shy lurker.
The "silent majority" speaks through The Evil Moderator!
(But you guys really should read and then comment on the Coulter column.)