QuarkXPress 6.0 - Next Week!!

2»

Comments

  • Reply 21 of 30
    keyboardf12keyboardf12 Posts: 1,379member
    Quote:

    Actually, ALL software should come that wa





    well thank goodness they don't i like manuals for expensive multifacted software. ifs its a deep program manuals are good.



    sometimes pdf on screen is good. sometimes you want to take the manuals to your big leather couch and puruse them with a bottle of cold mexican beer.



     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 22 of 30
    jante99jante99 Posts: 539member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by keyboardf12

    well thank goodness they don't i like manuals for expensive multifacted software. ifs its a deep program manuals are good.



    sometimes pdf on screen is good. sometimes you want to take the manuals to your big leather couch and puruse them with a bottle of cold mexican beer.







    Quark should follow Apple's lead with Final Cut Pro: you pay 999 but get three big informative manuals.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 23 of 30
    keyboardf12keyboardf12 Posts: 1,379member
    very true. the final cut pro manual kick _ass_
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 24 of 30
    709709 Posts: 2,016member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by pscates

    *good, earth-friendly points...*snip*



    Yes, I argee with you to some extent. The DVD-style boxes are both sexy and sleek, but....SUVs and Rainforest be damned! I want a friggin manual! Call me tactile, call me tacky, I don't care. My fingers love the appendix, and if that's a sin, I'm a sinner.



    Seriously, you'd think for a grand-plu$ piece of mediocre (IMO) software they would at least include a god-damned hard copy manual. I've long ago switched to InDesign, because the Quark shirkers truly drive me up the wall. Now, they expect me to upgrade for 500 bucks (because I, like most, stuck with 3.32) for not being 'loyal' to a program that is a One Trick Pony. F*ck them and their $199 6.1 'upgrade' shipping late next year.



    I'm through with these idiots.



    And Mtropolis ruled. Shame on them twice.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 25 of 30
    709709 Posts: 2,016member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by jante99

    Quark should follow Apple's lead with Final Cut Pro: you pay 999 but get three big informative manuals.



    That's what I'm talkin 'bout.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 26 of 30
    gnandagnanda Posts: 14member
    Why doesnt APple make its own QUARK???



    What is QUark and Apples relationship?Good or Bad
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 27 of 30
    Quote:

    Originally posted by BuonRotto

    Isn't that just killer?



    "Just in time for Jaguar comes Quark 6! What? Well, if you want Quark to take full advantage ofthose 970's running Panther, you'll just have to wait 3 years."




    lol, to true, ppl at quark have so much money they don't seem to care what ppl request. not trying to say the program isn't good because it is. I just think the price one pays for quark is what someone should pay for indesign and vice versa. I could easily use either, I throw my favor to indesign for versatility, speed definitely quark 5 in os9, we'll have to see how it works on a osx...
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 28 of 30
    Quote:

    Originally posted by dstranathan

    Now that its out, I hope to move to it in production within 6 to 12 months. I expect a LOT of bugs, a learning curve maybe, and of course the Panther updates to all be factored into the big equation.





    Now if only I could bet an EXCHANGE CLIENT for OS X I could move away from OS 9. For good.





    Distiller 6.0 is a Good thing too. Testing now...




    distiller 6 is the wave of the future, over-priced rip software is officially dead in my books...
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 29 of 30
    Quote:

    Originally posted by jante99

    Quark should follow Apple's lead with Final Cut Pro: you pay 999 but get three big informative manuals.



    so which is bulkier, FCP manual or the Bible?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 30 of 30
    buonrottobuonrotto Posts: 6,368member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Dark Seraph

    so which is bulkier, FCP manual or the Bible?



    What's the difference?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.