Here's a quote from the Reuters article on the NY times:
Quote:
There has been speculation that Apple would eventually use Intel chips and the announcement on Monday does not chance that, Enderle said, adding that he still expected Apple to announce next year it will use Intel chips.
``I think chances are like 8 out of 10 they will go with Intel,'' Enderle said. ``I know that he's (Jobs) been over at Intel an awful lot and Intel has been over with him quite a bit.''
Those analysts are more stubborn than Jobs sticking with Motorola. If IBM comes close to the numbers it mentioned in the keynote, there's no good reason to move to Intel, except to get these analyst asshats to shut it.
Comments
Originally posted by jante99
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/06/24/te...gy/24APPL.html
Pretty good article but it smothers the news that the G5 beats a dual Xeon Dell to the bottom of the page.
for good reason... those comparisons could have been heavily biased.
if you go to ars technica there are several points that have been made that question the validity of some of the benchmarks.
either way, they are fast mother****ers. just wish there were a cheaper dual or a cheaper entry single
There has been speculation that Apple would eventually use Intel chips and the announcement on Monday does not chance that, Enderle said, adding that he still expected Apple to announce next year it will use Intel chips.
``I think chances are like 8 out of 10 they will go with Intel,'' Enderle said. ``I know that he's (Jobs) been over at Intel an awful lot and Intel has been over with him quite a bit.''
Those analysts are more stubborn than Jobs sticking with Motorola. If IBM comes close to the numbers it mentioned in the keynote, there's no good reason to move to Intel, except to get these analyst asshats to shut it.