moved: intel have problems to increase Mhz !!

13»

Comments

  • Reply 41 of 46
    All I want to say here is that if IBM's chip lives up to the hype, and can REALLY take advantage of a high bandwidth memory and bus, then a MP mac will be all I ever need in terms of raw power. Intel can go ahead and release a 3.6 Ghz chip, but if I buy a PPC 970 dual @ 1.8Ghz and get roughly the same performance, who cares how fast their single chip is?



    My experience so far is that Multi-processing works quite well on the mac, and can only improve with a vastly bigger FSB and faster memory.



    Yes, the G4 era is almost at a close. Amen to that.



     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 42 of 46
    xypexype Posts: 672member
    [quote]Originally posted by Powerdoc:

    <strong>Right that's why my car has a turbo-diesel. High torque low consomption. </strong><hr></blockquote>



    I have a nice VW Passat that runs around 1200 km with one fuel load. Cheap!



    [ 12-13-2002: Message edited by: xype ]</p>
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 43 of 46
    krassykrassy Posts: 595member
    to topic:



    could be that IBM won't have this problem. this is from IBM:



    "IBM Announces World's Smallest Working Silicon Transistor



    Yorktown Heights, N.Y., December 9, 2002 -- IBM today announced the world's smallest working silicon transistor. With this transistor IBM has been able to push silicon to limits on a molecular scale not previously achieved.



    At six nanometers in length, this new transistor is at least 10 times smaller than the state-of-the-art transistors in production today. A nanometer (nm) is one billionth of a meter. The Consortium of International Semiconductor Companies in its 2001 International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors projected that transistors have to be smaller than 9 nanometers by 2016 in order to continue the performance trend. IBM is the first company to make working transistors below that gate length."



    [ 12-15-2002: Message edited by: Krassy ]</p>
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 44 of 46
    When I look at the past year at Intel's increase of Mgz I

    laugh. Why, becuase there only creating chips that have

    all kinds of speed but no stability and high voltage consumption. When the president of the company stated that there where problems with voltage loss i could'nt stop laughing. How many watts is that new chip comsuming... :eek: :eek:



    This is why IBM and Moto have such low Mgz ratings. Efficiancy, stablity and low energy consumption is something that we have all come to know and love, and thats one reason why we use Apple's products.



    All you PC/Mgz zealots can ****off with your made for Xp products and your 3rd party OS...your polishing the

    brass on your burnt crispy heatsinks....its going down man....but thats just my opinion....and I might be wrong.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.