Dual Processor iBook

Posted:
in Future Apple Hardware edited January 2014
I was talking to a person (not sure i should say who) but it was online so he could be lying but he said he worked for apple and had a dual iBook he made.
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 29
    are you sure he said "dual-processor" and not meant "dual-USB" [aka. the present iBook]?
  • Reply 2 of 29
    I have my bet on he's lying.



    It would be pretty neato, though. But I think duals would go into the powerbook first, if at all. A G3 would be a good chip to use though, because of low power and heat.



    I dont think the world is ready yet for dual processor laptops.
  • Reply 3 of 29
    worst thread ever.
  • Reply 4 of 29
    ast3r3xast3r3x Posts: 5,012member
    he didn't say they are coming out, he said he made it for himelf, and yes he said dual processors



    it is likly he is lying but you never know and he seemed to know enough about apple (although nothing much more then we do...at least that he talked about)



    i was talking to him in a ghost recon game i was hosting



    oh well if it woudl happen...you heard it here first...i got possibly though probably not insider info of something that exists, although he again didnt' say its coming out
  • Reply 5 of 29
    ast3r3xast3r3x Posts: 5,012member
    [quote]Originally posted by Ensign Pulver:

    <strong>worst thread ever.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    well with only 100 posts i'm not sure you've seen ever



    *i'd give his alias but ya know, IF there is truth then i don't want to get him in trouble, i'm not saying its tru, just telling you what i heard...i know SOME peole would at least like to hear that somone has done it
  • Reply 6 of 29
    [quote]Originally posted by ast3r3x:

    <strong>



    well with only 100 posts i'm not sure you've seen ever



    *i'd give his alias but ya know, IF there is truth then i don't want to get him in trouble, i'm not saying its tru, just telling you what i heard...i know SOME peole would at least like to hear that somone has done it</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Some guy in a Ghost Recon chat claims to have built a dual processor G3 iBook and you think that's worthy of serious comment? 100 posts is more than enough to know there's already a big signal to noise ratio problem on these boards and silliness like this doesn't help.
  • Reply 7 of 29
    ast3r3xast3r3x Posts: 5,012member
    [quote]Originally posted by Ensign Pulver:

    <strong>



    Some guy in a Ghost Recon chat claims to have built a dual processor G3 iBook and you think that's worthy of serious comment? 100 posts is more than enough to know there's already a big signal to noise ratio problem on these boards and silliness like this doesn't help.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    i didn't mean to insult you...well ok ok i did but perhaps it was a bit rash...as too was ur comment. I agree this is 99% probable bull, but it has been discussed so much around here without ANY proof even verbal of it being done, and this although almost definatly fake is at least something, so i figured those people woudl like to know.





    *and although it is most likely fake, if it would slip out, it would be casual conversation, he wouldn't hold a press conference about it
  • Reply 8 of 29
    [quote]Originally posted by ast3r3x:

    i didn't mean to insult you...well ok ok i did but perhaps it was a bit rash...as too was ur comment. I agree this is 99% probable bull, but it has been discussed so much around here without ANY proof even verbal of it being done, and this although almost definatly fake is at least something, so i figured those people woudl like to know.

    <hr></blockquote>



    It's all good.
  • Reply 9 of 29
    [quote]Originally posted by Ensign Pulver:

    <strong>worst thread ever.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    i second that.
  • Reply 10 of 29
    bigcbigc Posts: 1,224member
    I third it!
  • Reply 11 of 29
    costiquecostique Posts: 1,084member
    That would mean he made a motherboard himself. It is not entirely impossible in theory, but quite unbelievable in practice. He's either a liar or a dreamer.
  • Reply 12 of 29
    [quote]Originally posted by costique:

    <strong>That would mean he made a motherboard himself. It is not entirely impossible in theory, but quite unbelievable in practice. He's either a liar or a dreamer.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Worst thread ever? I've seen a lot of bad threads here, so I don't think so. Bad thread? That's another question. At least it didn't have "CONFIRMED!" in the title.



    In some companies, you can scavenge prototype parts and roll your on, as it were. I doubt that's possible at Apple, where I'm sure they post a guard, two dogs and the reincarnation of Hydra in front of their garbage.



    Also, has anyone seen an actual dual-proc G3 in any computer? You just don't slap a two G3s together and get them to play nice.



    I only popped into this thread because I'm an eternal optimist... and because I think my 600 iBook is getting slow.
  • Reply 13 of 29
    did I not read somewhere that a duel 1ghz G4 machine is inline with a P4 3Ghz in terms of getting things done?



    Therefore, perhaps apple might have considered a duel cpu laptop as a way to keep up. However, when you think about the items in a laptop that eat battery life they are prolly in this order:-



    1 - Screen.

    2 - Hard Drive

    3 - CD ROM

    4 - CPU

    5 - Cooling Fans

    5 - The rest of the system.



    In order to speed up laptops there are more battery efficient ways to be exhausted before anyone would consider adding another CPU and Fan.



    Perhaps this guy is just a hobbist. I remember when someone made an amiga "laptop" It looked like a suitcase!!!



    [ 12-19-2002: Message edited by: Gargoyle ]</p>
  • Reply 14 of 29
    ast3r3xast3r3x Posts: 5,012member
    haha, i love that everyone HATES this thread, it was just posted for people who played with the idea of a possible dual proccessor laptop.
  • Reply 15 of 29
    stunnedstunned Posts: 1,096member
    <img src="graemlins/oyvey.gif" border="0" alt="[No]" />

    Anything that makes the ibook more expensive is a bad idea
  • Reply 16 of 29
    Dear god will people PLEASE stop posting threads about things they "heard".



    I heard from someone who i cant say that they're going to skip straight to the G7, and use quad 4.0 ghz chips. Im not sure he's telling the truth i just thought i'd pass it along.





    Just as dumb as your thread.
  • Reply 17 of 29
    paulpaul Posts: 5,278member
    well actually this thread is dumber because that actually has a remote possibility oh being correct in the next 5-10 years or so...



    we will *never* see dual G3s.... it just isn't the kind of chip that plays well in pairs...

    the SMP instruction set is screwed up or something... even worse then the 604e chips... that was one of the major improvements of the G4
  • Reply 18 of 29
    chuckerchucker Posts: 5,089member
    [quote]Originally posted by ast3r3x:

    <strong>he said he made it for himelf</strong><hr></blockquote>



    He can create a laptop on his own?
  • Reply 19 of 29
    [quote]Originally posted by fireants22:

    <strong>are you sure he said "dual-processor" and not meant "dual-USB" [aka. the present iBook]?</strong><hr></blockquote>



    this is the only good post in this thread!
  • Reply 20 of 29
    murbotmurbot Posts: 5,262member
    While he was in there, he should have added a third processor. Now THAT would be fast.
Sign In or Register to comment.