Oh I don't know.....maybe broken trust from their president?
Clinton is President again?
On one hand, we had a President that ADMITTED a direct lie to the American people.
On the other, we have a President that is suspected by the Left of lying. They have no real proof...just suspicions.
And we're talking about trust? Hmmm. This is why I always bring up Clinton. Anyone who supported Clinton through his direct lie is, IMO, immediately disqualified from commenting on Bush. There is no moral authority to do so.
Now why couldn;t you have admitted that earlier? That's really all (OK..well not ALL) I've been saying. You don't have to agree or like Bush, but at least admit the political reality. He's going to win unlesss something extradinary occurs, like a depression.
Well this morning's news may change everything. I'd call it extraordinary. They weren't so kind to Clinton ( or Gore ) after his little slip up about the use of whitehouse cigars. How do you think people are going to react to this if it proves out?
ummm! It doesn't look good for dubbya! Things like this can make up for a lack of a strong front runner. Just look at the last election.
On one hand, we had a President that ADMITTED a direct lie to the American people.
On the other, we have a President that is suspected by the Left of lying. They have no real proof...just suspicions.
And we're talking about trust? Hmmm. This is why I always bring up Clinton. Anyone who supported Clinton through his direct lie is, IMO, immediately disqualified from commenting on Bush. There is no moral authority to do so.
I've already previously stated that I lost respect for Clinton after he lied to the american people. Lieing is lieing. There's really no other way to look at it. Before Clinton lied it was simply a matter of infidelity and none of our business. He could have refused to comment on it ( not that it wouldn't have come out eventualy ). The moment he lied it became our business.
But Bush. Well this is much more serious. It involved large sums of money and many deaths! It seems that they have a little more than suspicions. If he can't come up with a good explaination ( and I mean soon ) this could be the thing thiat brings him down. I know you are still in denial but make no mistake. This could get ugly.
Well this morning's news may change everything. I'd call it extraordinary. They weren't so kind to Clinton ( or Gore ) after his little slip up about the use of whitehouse cigars. How do you think people are going to react to this if it proves out?
ummm! It doesn't look good for dubbya! Things like this can make up for a lack of a strong front runner. Just look at the last election.
Oh well.
Still in check.
Please. I know you'd like this to become a Lewinskygate, but it won't. This won't even last the week on the news.
Quote:
I've already previously stated that I lost respect for Clinton after he lied to the american people. Lieing is lieing. There's really no other way to look at it. Before Clinton lied it was simply a matter of infidelity and none of our business. He could have refused to comment on it ( not that it wouldn't have come out eventualy ). The moment he lied it became our business.
But Bush. Well this is much more serious. It involved large sums of money and many deaths! It seems that they have a little more than suspicions. If he can't come up with a good explaination ( and I mean soon ) this could be the thing thiat brings him down. I know you are still in denial but make no mistake. This could get ugly.
I thought lieing was lieing [sic]?
I'm not in denial. This doesn't begin to approach something that could bring him down. He won't take the blame. Mark my words.
Comments
Originally posted by jimmac
Oh I don't know.....maybe broken trust from their president?
Clinton is President again?
On one hand, we had a President that ADMITTED a direct lie to the American people.
On the other, we have a President that is suspected by the Left of lying. They have no real proof...just suspicions.
And we're talking about trust? Hmmm. This is why I always bring up Clinton. Anyone who supported Clinton through his direct lie is, IMO, immediately disqualified from commenting on Bush. There is no moral authority to do so.
Originally posted by SDW2001
Now why couldn;t you have admitted that earlier? That's really all (OK..well not ALL) I've been saying. You don't have to agree or like Bush, but at least admit the political reality. He's going to win unlesss something extradinary occurs, like a depression.
Well this morning's news may change everything. I'd call it extraordinary. They weren't so kind to Clinton ( or Gore ) after his little slip up about the use of whitehouse cigars. How do you think people are going to react to this if it proves out?
ummm! It doesn't look good for dubbya! Things like this can make up for a lack of a strong front runner. Just look at the last election.
Oh well.
Still in check.
Originally posted by SDW2001
Clinton is President again?
On one hand, we had a President that ADMITTED a direct lie to the American people.
On the other, we have a President that is suspected by the Left of lying. They have no real proof...just suspicions.
And we're talking about trust? Hmmm. This is why I always bring up Clinton. Anyone who supported Clinton through his direct lie is, IMO, immediately disqualified from commenting on Bush. There is no moral authority to do so.
I've already previously stated that I lost respect for Clinton after he lied to the american people. Lieing is lieing. There's really no other way to look at it. Before Clinton lied it was simply a matter of infidelity and none of our business. He could have refused to comment on it ( not that it wouldn't have come out eventualy ). The moment he lied it became our business.
But Bush. Well this is much more serious. It involved large sums of money and many deaths! It seems that they have a little more than suspicions. If he can't come up with a good explaination ( and I mean soon ) this could be the thing thiat brings him down. I know you are still in denial but make no mistake. This could get ugly.
Originally posted by jimmac
Well this morning's news may change everything. I'd call it extraordinary. They weren't so kind to Clinton ( or Gore ) after his little slip up about the use of whitehouse cigars. How do you think people are going to react to this if it proves out?
ummm! It doesn't look good for dubbya! Things like this can make up for a lack of a strong front runner. Just look at the last election.
Oh well.
Still in check.
Please. I know you'd like this to become a Lewinskygate, but it won't. This won't even last the week on the news.
I've already previously stated that I lost respect for Clinton after he lied to the american people. Lieing is lieing. There's really no other way to look at it. Before Clinton lied it was simply a matter of infidelity and none of our business. He could have refused to comment on it ( not that it wouldn't have come out eventualy ). The moment he lied it became our business.
But Bush. Well this is much more serious. It involved large sums of money and many deaths! It seems that they have a little more than suspicions. If he can't come up with a good explaination ( and I mean soon ) this could be the thing thiat brings him down. I know you are still in denial but make no mistake. This could get ugly.
I thought lieing was lieing [sic]?
I'm not in denial. This doesn't begin to approach something that could bring him down. He won't take the blame. Mark my words.
Originally posted by SDW2001
Please. I know you'd like this to become a Lewinskygate, but it won't. This won't even last the week on the news.
I thought lieing was lieing [sic]?
I'm not in denial. This doesn't begin to approach something that could bring him down. He won't take the blame. Mark my words.
We'll see! I think you're underestimating the severity of the situation.
Originally posted by jimmac
For the first time I agree with Fellowship on something.
Fellowship
Originally posted by jimmac
We'll see! I think you're unestimating the severity of the situation.
I suppose time will tell...as they say.
Originally posted by jimmac
Oh I don't know.....maybe broken trust from their president?
Really? You're the one who entertained the suspicion that the President knew about 9/11 beforehand. When did you EVER trust him?