3.8GHz P4

2»

Comments

  • Reply 21 of 33
    eugeneeugene Posts: 8,254member
    There's a big reason why Intel isn't officially at 3.8 GHz right now. They left AMD in their wake last summer and haven't been pressed to look backward until now.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 22 of 33
    From the pictures of the cooling systems, I would guess these guys are legit.

    On the other hand, they are very expensive systems - I guess they complement the insanely huge LCDs that they sell.



    Copying Apple? At least they have some taste...



    EDIT: Boo-yah, 50 posts.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 23 of 33
    cakecake Posts: 1,010member
    Of course there's no 3.8 yet.

    Did you guys all miss the disclaimer at the bottom of the page?



    Quote:

    * 3.8GHz Accelerated Intel Pentium 4 Hyper-Threading CPU (3.20GHz base clock speed).



     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 24 of 33
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Cake

    Of course there's no 3.8 yet.

    Did you guys all miss the disclaimer at the bottom of the page?




    Yeah. You can do this yourself and save some money!



    My 3.2 is only stable up to about 3.7, but I don't have any special cooling so I don't run it like that.



    -- Mark
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 25 of 33
    I'm guessing that it's pretty difficult to OC a G5, although the cases are pretty cooling-oriented. In order to speed up the chip, you'd *probably* have to speed up the bus or change the multiplier- I'm not sure that either of those things is easy to do.



    Still, 3.2 -> 3.8 is less than a 20% improvement, and it's *only* a *single* *processor*. Most things that are compute intensive enough to be totally CPU bound can probably be parallelized.



    I'd take a dual 2Ghz G5 over one of these any day

    I'd take a 4-way 3Ghz G5 over one of *those* any day

    .

    .

    etc.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 26 of 33
    Quote:

    Originally posted by dfryer

    Most things that are compute intensive enough to be totally CPU bound can probably be parallelized.



    Some, but not most. Many interesting things like cloth simulations or maximum entropy image filtering techniques need to be done globally and sequentially, which makes them incredibly difficult to parallelize, as each tiny step depends on the last tiny step's result.



    -- Mark
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 27 of 33
    Quote:

    Originally posted by mark_wilkins

    Some, but not most. Many interesting things like cloth simulations or maximum entropy image filtering techniques need to be done globally and sequentially, which makes them incredibly difficult to parallelize, as each tiny step depends on the last tiny step's result.



    -- Mark




    That's because the CS guys have gotta start using their brains and hence make some parallel implementations of cloth simulating algorithms. . .



    Anyway, I haven't actually found a way to buy anything off this site. If there is a way, they don't make it easy.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 28 of 33
    chagichagi Posts: 284member
    No offense to those that posted in this thread, but I'm midly suprised that nobody was familiar with this particular form of overclocking.



    Basically the problem with running processors faster is that they generate more heat, and you eventually reach a point where the heat generation is critical (i.e. aircooling doesn't do enough to prevent the chip from nuking itself).



    Refrigerated cases are the ultimate in modding your PC for the purpose of squeezing out every last possible MHz. The technology literally keeps the temperature of the CPUs well below freezing in order to push them to their absolute limits.



    e.g.



    http://www.hothardware.com/hh_files/...ochillp4.shtml



    http://www6.tomshardware.com/howto/20030224/
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 29 of 33
    They say they overclocked a 3.2Ghz P4 to 3.8Ghz, so it's not really 3.8Ghz. Who knows, it could blow up any second.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 30 of 33
    Everyone repeat after me...



    THERE IS NO 3.8Ghz P4, YET!



    ---



    Hell overclocking pc freaks are having trouble getting it past 3.6 Ghz and that is with very exotic cooling.



    The next core intel pumps out will hit 3.8 but that is still yet to be released.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 31 of 33
    bungebunge Posts: 7,329member
    You mean, that, Apple isn't doomed? So I can go ahead and buy a new Mac? PHEW! I was worried there for a second!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 32 of 33
    as long as you an take the heat away, the chips will run VERY fast. I remember seeing benchmarks for a 4Ghz P4 when the fist came out with the northwood model name....



    ... Its true, they were right next to the pictures of the chip with a pot of liquid nitrogen sitting on it!



    edit: found it! - It was a 2.8 P4



    Some people have too much money and not enough sense!



    more edit: he he... -192 degrees heat sink!!!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 33 of 33
    placeboplacebo Posts: 5,767member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Gargoyle

    as long as you an take the heat away, the chips will run VERY fast. I remember seeing benchmarks for a 4Ghz P4 when the fist came out with the northwood model name....



    ... Its true, they were right next to the pictures of the chip with a pot of liquid nitrogen sitting on it!



    edit: found it! - It was a 2.8 P4



    Some people have too much money and not enough sense!



    more edit: he he... -192 degrees heat sink!!!




    Seriously, I don't think that the system will actually last very long...chips, liquid N or no liquid N, aren't designed to be that hot.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.