As far as I've heard, right now he's healthy as a horse. About being a bastard, an easy check will show you his parents were indeed married at the time of his conception.
Actually, yes. Quite some time ago. But choking isn't considered a physical ailment anyway, so thus a person who is choking would not be considered "sick."
Actually, yes. Quite some time ago. But choking isn't considered a physical ailment anyway, so thus a person who is choking would not be considered "sick."
Ah, but someone that would alter the tax codes so they [become] good for investors and bad for the rest could be considered "sick."
In addition, while you may call him sick (mentally ill) given your disagreements with his policy, you still fail to address how exactly someone who has choked on a pretzel could be constituted as being sick. I understand that choking on food is rare to the point of being near folklore amongst human beings, but nonetheless I've yet to hear it be classified as a physical ailment.
In addition, while you may call him sick (mentally ill) given your disagreements with his policy, you still fail to address how exactly someone who has choked on a pretzel could be constituted as being sick. I understand that choking on food is rare to the point of being near folklore amongst human beings, but nonetheless I've yet to hear it be classified as a physical ailment.
It is? Where was it exactly that I said unhealthy?
What I said in actuality was that as far as I've heard he is "healthy", as in not "sick." Sick being the word you used. But that's ok. I'm happy to clear up the confusion.
The 15 last posts where clueless. Some more posts like this, and i will think that no more real substance can be added to this thread, therefore it will be closed.
Comments
Originally posted by bunge
Um...it sucks? Sorry, but Bush is a sick bastard.
As far as I've heard, right now he's healthy as a horse. About being a bastard, an easy check will show you his parents were indeed married at the time of his conception.
Originally posted by rageous
As far as I've heard, right now he's healthy as a horse.
So they've dislodged the pretzel?
Originally posted by bunge
So they've dislodged the pretzel?
Actually, yes. Quite some time ago. But choking isn't considered a physical ailment anyway, so thus a person who is choking would not be considered "sick."
Originally posted by rageous
Actually, yes. Quite some time ago. But choking isn't considered a physical ailment anyway, so thus a person who is choking would not be considered "sick."
Ah, but someone that would alter the tax codes so they [become] good for investors and bad for the rest could be considered "sick."
Originally posted by bunge
Ah, but someone that would alter the tax codes so they because good for investors and bad for the rest could be considered "sick."
What?
Originally posted by rageous
What?
Don't encourage him.
Originally posted by NaplesX
Don't encourage him.
Thank you.
Originally posted by rageous
I'm encouraging him to clarify that post, as it was poorly constructed.
I put in an edit for you, thanks for (almost) pointing it out.
Originally posted by rageous
In addition, while you may call him sick (mentally ill) given your disagreements with his policy, you still fail to address how exactly someone who has choked on a pretzel could be constituted as being sick. I understand that choking on food is rare to the point of being near folklore amongst human beings, but nonetheless I've yet to hear it be classified as a physical ailment.
Unhealthy. That's the word you used.
Originally posted by bunge
Unhealthy. That's the word you used.
It is? Where was it exactly that I said unhealthy?
What I said in actuality was that as far as I've heard he is "healthy", as in not "sick." Sick being the word you used. But that's ok. I'm happy to clear up the confusion.
Originally posted by rageous
"healthy", as in not "sick."
I'm sorry sarcasm isn't your strong point.
Originally posted by bunge
I'm sorry sarcasm isn't your strong point.
ditto.
The Secretary of the Treasury... a republican... thought the tax cuts as structured were a bad idea.
Kevin Phillips... a conservative... writes a book slamming the Bush dynasty... and it's culture of entitlement.
What does it mean when the "bush-bashers" are republicans, conservatives, former secretaries and appointees and the Army war college?
I think it's pretty eveident that the left isn't making shit up.
Some would rather ignore it and attack the messenger.
A Wolf in sheeps clothing.
Just trying to sell his book.
A lame duck senator going down in a flame of glory.
A nattering tool that likes the sound of his own voice.
Originally posted by chu_bakka
Or Zell is an idiot.
A Wolf in sheeps clothing.
Just trying to sell his book.
A lame duck senator going down in a flame of glory.
A nattering tool that likes the sound of his own voice.
Similar charges have been leveled at Oneill, which was my point (except the Senator part!).
is that all ya got?
So the content of his statements means nothing?
Yeah ever hear Zell? It's laughable.