Moved to Syria and Lebanon. And from there only god knows. Al Qaeda is involved here. And I do believe you'll see them using these WoMD in the near future. It's only a mater of time now.
SH-OBL connection? It's tenuous at the very best, to the point of the admin. having to fabricate stories/ tell lies to sell war against Iraq.
Saudi-OBL connection? Now there's a different story altogether. The links are strong enough for the Bush Admin to necessitate censoring 25 or so pages of the 9-11 "inquiry" which reveal key Saudi connections to al Qaeda/terrorism funding. What's going on here? Who is implicated? Why the secrecy?
Lol...Debka...An older Israeli friend of mine told me about that website. He "warned" me they tend to exagerate quite a bit. This coming from an Israeli army veteran.
By the way, isn't it funny how our ****load of satellites can get "clear" pictures of trucks loaded with WMDs(UN pics) but can somehow "miss" the convoys moving those same weapons out of Iraq?
I guess some people will just believe anything as long as it's what's best for the party.
Comments
Originally posted by majorspunk
Moved to Syria and Lebanon. And from there only god knows. Al Qaeda is involved here. And I do believe you'll see them using these WoMD in the near future. It's only a mater of time now.
In the Lebanon?
a) What are you talking about?
b) Where did you get the idea?
c) How about some proof.
Saudi-OBL connection? Now there's a different story altogether. The links are strong enough for the Bush Admin to necessitate censoring 25 or so pages of the 9-11 "inquiry" which reveal key Saudi connections to al Qaeda/terrorism funding. What's going on here? Who is implicated? Why the secrecy?
Originally posted by Hassan i Sabbah
In the Lebanon?
a) What are you talking about?
b) Where did you get the idea?
c) How about some proof.
Why are you so lazy?
The Iranian connection:
http://www.debka.com/article.php?aid=288
By the way, isn't it funny how our ****load of satellites can get "clear" pictures of trucks loaded with WMDs(UN pics) but can somehow "miss" the convoys moving those same weapons out of Iraq?
I guess some people will just believe anything as long as it's what's best for the party.
2. How do you know they were undetected?
3. Debka is not the only source regards the Iranian connection. There are plenty of other sources to corroborate this information.
4. I think the most prudent thing to do in these kind of matters is to adopt the stance of guilty until proven innocent.
Originally posted by giant
well, majorspunk clearly has been living under a rock for the past two years.
I'm sorry giant, but you're wrong. Your statement implies that he's no longer living under a rock.