barefeats is known for posting poorly run tests/comparisons.
Kinda par for the course. How can we expect Barefeats to run a decent benchmark when magazines like PC Magazine with far more resource publish articles in 2003 comparing Premiere 6 and Word as legit crossplatform benchmarks. Benchmark is becoming a dirty word.
Comments
You'll be able to get faster machines for the same price.
Originally posted by Mr. Thermistor
About 10%
Yes.
Apple has published some benchmarks on his own site,comparing the two.
Note the dismal performance of the 1.8 and 1.6; in one test the MP 1.0 G4 beat the 1.8 Ghz G5!
Originally posted by ryaxnb
Note the dismal performance of the 1.8 and 1.6; in one test the MP 1.0 G4 beat the 1.8 Ghz G5!
Which one?
Originally posted by bunge
Which one?
This one, apparently:
Originally posted by LudwigVan
This one, apparently...
Thanks. I was looking at the wrong comparisons.
Originally posted by applenut
barefeats sucks
WTH?
so these G4/G5 comparisons are pretty accurate for now. but the G5 has the 'potential' for exceding further...dang 64-bitless programs.
Plus, isn't panther just a intermediary between a 32-bit O.S. and a fully capable 64-bit?
Originally posted by Longhorn
barefeats is known for posting poorly run tests/comparisons.
Kinda par for the course. How can we expect Barefeats to run a decent benchmark when magazines like PC Magazine with far more resource publish articles in 2003 comparing Premiere 6 and Word as legit crossplatform benchmarks. Benchmark is becoming a dirty word.