longhorn-redmond copy cats strike again
microsoft has announced that the name of the longhorn (and eventual real version come 2020 or something?) interface is Indigo, these jerks duplicate mac, and badly i might add, every os release! they even joke about coping off of apple in this msdn video, sometrhing like "gee you need a latee(spelling, i dont do coffee) a black turtle neck and a powermac" I AM NOT KIDDING!!!!!
heres a link:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdntv/epi...b/manifest.xml
the copying is so obvious, doesnt apple have software pattents, cant they enforce them? i mean windows is ok but nothing new ever comes out of there they just make a lisensable version of a watered down piss-ant rip-off of mac-os
just my 2 cents, why doesnt apple do an ad campeign about being like 5 yrs. ahead of windows at all times in the last 20 years
heres a link:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdntv/epi...b/manifest.xml
the copying is so obvious, doesnt apple have software pattents, cant they enforce them? i mean windows is ok but nothing new ever comes out of there they just make a lisensable version of a watered down piss-ant rip-off of mac-os
just my 2 cents, why doesnt apple do an ad campeign about being like 5 yrs. ahead of windows at all times in the last 20 years
Comments
Queer Eye for the UI...
Originally posted by Moogs
Longhorn will blow, just like everything else MS makes.
That's what I've been saying since the first mentions of longhorn came around a while ago. It will suck. It will be virus prone, it will be unstable, and it will try to copy Apple's UI in every way, but fail miserably. MS is a joke, so is their software.
Originally posted by drewprops
Hey, I can't get that video to open...installed the latest version of Windoze Media Player and made sure the WMP plug-in is in the Library/Internet Plugins folder and still can't get it to work....any tips you guys? How about some screen caps?
It's MSDN TV. I would expect it only works within IE for Windows. I wouldn't even expect it to work within any other Windows browser.
Anyone besides me think that if the OS X interface was called Mustard, Longhorn's would be Mayonnaise? Or Horseradish? Or Ketchup, at the very least?
Do they even try to be somewhat subtle and sly, or is always this obvious?
I'm not a gratuitous Microsoft basher/hater (I own Office v.X, after all and I used IE for years and like it just fine), but they're just really ridiculous on a certain level.
Seriously, is there no one there at Microsoft who, when the name "indigo" came up at a late-night meeting, simply spoke up and said "hey, you know what guys? I'm gonna go out on a limb here, but that's getting REALLY close to Apple's name for their OS X UI, Aqua. How about we think on this one a little more, okay? I mean, for God's sake...let's at least make a ****ing effort for once! There are about half a bazillion words out there we can use...how about we NOT choose one that's a $%@%#@ mother$#$#ing shade of blue?!?!?! Just HUMOR ME, for once! PLEASE?!?! Think with all this $#@% brainpower assembled in this #!#%@ room, we can choose SOMETHING not so easily linked to those iDiots in Cupertino?!?! Those Mac zealots on their little message boards are going to rip us to shreads!"
Apparently not.
Anyone else want to wager against me that they'll soon unveil an "innovative, nothing else like it!" windows management system with an "é" worked into the name somehow?
Uncovér
Displayé
Unvéil
Mové
Exposéd
Idiots. I mean, honestly...
Apple has done its fair share of apparent co-opting from Windows, if often through the OpenStep OS or for compatibility/familiarity purposes in fact.
For some stuff like Expose (sorry, no accent, it's a PITA on a Windows machine right now), I wonder what IP Apple has on this and other such devices.
"Microsoft does such a good job at making Windows look so nice," they'll say.
"Apple did it 3 years ago," we'll reply.
Everything I can find on MS' site, and otherwise, states that Indigo is the name for the Longhorn communications services layer, not the UI.
Now, that com layer can be/is used for creating a GUI locally or remotely, so in that sense it's a UI layer, but it's not the name of the actual look and feel, like Aqua is.
Re: Longhorn, I'm far more worried about the DRM and licensing strategies MS will build in than whether they've decided to nab a few of Apple's ideas. After all, given their own ideas, who can blame them for borrowing?
MS appears once.
Guess under what heading?
Loser: A Dog Named SPOT... when Microsoft stops imitating, and starts innovating, watch out.
SPOT is Smart Personal Objects Technology... you know, those refrigerator magnets?
Originally posted by Kickaha
Hmmm.
Everything I can find on MS' site, and otherwise, states that Indigo is the name for the Longhorn communications services layer, not the UI.
Now, that com layer can be/is used for creating a GUI locally or remotely, so in that sense it's a UI layer, but it's not the name of the actual look and feel, like Aqua is.
close enough, and they only include a command line coder, nothing like apple or the visual basic gui builder
wtf wants to do a command-line gui build?
But I still maintain that if Aqua was instead called Sourdough, Microsoft would see fit to call their take on it Pumpernickel.
It's not the "blue" at issue here. Besides, I think Apple's Aqua seems more for its watery, slick, glossy qualities than any outright "blue" connections.
But I might be wrong on that.
Oh man...I'm channeling Nebagakid...
i am channeling homer....my hero and role model for life (my poor unfortunate kids)
g