apple.com Navigation Bar...?

2»

Comments

  • Reply 21 of 26
    eugeneeugene Posts: 8,254member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by DMBand0026

    Oh geez.

    Announcement to ya'll who are not familiar with Eugene: Do not get him started on tabs. That is all.




    I'm perfectly fine with System Preferences / Control style tabs because they are used the right way. They're a standard size. They don't move. They're not spawned and destroyed. They are stationary and they are used to group different objects and not as bookmarks.



    In fact, I prefer the Jaguar tab design to the current Panther one.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 22 of 26
    eugeneeugene Posts: 8,254member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Synotic

    I gave it a shot.



    One of the reasons the original ones might look better is because they are actually composited from multiple layers of lighting and shadows. Mine is just a straight gradient



    Also, I just quickly made the top bar identical to the bottom. It's slightly smaller than Merovingian's original mockup. If this bothers anyone I'll see if I can make a slightly larger one.




    I prefer the bigger tabs because it cements the relationship between the rows of buttons. The big tabs are the main tabs. The little bar underneath is contextual info which depends on the big tab.



    Two rows of equally sized buttons are distracting. You're almost fooled into checking both rows for the button you're looking for when you really only need to look at one or the other.



    No reason to change it...
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 23 of 26
    drewpropsdrewprops Posts: 2,321member
    I love the new design ideas AND think that Eugene has a good point about the perception of the tabs as implying hierarchy.



    Boy that makes me a fence-sitter don't it?



    Still, you get points for making Eugene talk about tabs!!!!



     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 24 of 26
    cosmonutcosmonut Posts: 4,872member
    I agree, the one with the bigger upper tabs is PERFECT! Good work!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 25 of 26
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Eugene



    Two rows of equally sized buttons are distracting. You're almost fooled into checking both rows for the button you're looking for when you really only need to look at one or the other.



    No reason to change it...




    That reasoning is correct but it's the lower tabs that are too big (and/or given too much visual weight), rather than the upper row being too small (imho, and compared with the current apple.com).



    Plus, the second row, in the current real apple.com version is a bit of an ugly hack, jamming text into a thin bar that overpowers the text. There is no need for that second bar since it is no longer part of the Panther tabs and is just a vestigial trace of the old design.



    i.e compare:



    http://artemis.arstechnica.com/revie...abs-jaguar.png



    and



    http://artemis.arstechnica.com/revie...bs-panther.png



    I'm not sure what would replace it though.



    (I made a mockup based on the Merovigian's original Interface Builder, but with button width the same as apple.com's--well slightly larger but that was a mistake--and I thought it looked really good. I've got no idea how to host an image on .mac though)
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 26 of 26
    frank777frank777 Posts: 5,839member
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.