ye obligatory "if the presidential election were now" poll

13»

Comments

  • Reply 41 of 44
    shawnjshawnj Posts: 6,656member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Kickaha

    Pow. Right back to either-or two-party politics.



    Bleah.




    Did we ever leave two-party politics? In a way, *we* are responsible for the two-party system by compromising our ideal candidate for the most electable candidate (closest to our own views). That's exactly what happens a lot of the time. Yeah, it's our fault, but it'll continue like this until we initiate major reform. Duverger's Law states that winner-take-all plurality voting naturally leads to a two party system. I place ultimate blame on the system itself.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 42 of 44
    giantgiant Posts: 6,041member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by CosmoNut

    It's called a Republic, not a Democracy.



    It's a democratic republic. Are there any governments that are pure democracies? I don't think so.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 43 of 44
    paulpaul Posts: 5,278member
    back in 500BC Athens there was
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 44 of 44
    gilschgilsch Posts: 1,995member
    I'm still laughing .... AO "ultra-liberal"???

    Not just liberal, but ultra-liberal.

    How far to the right would someone

    have to be to find this place ultra-liberal?





    I voted for Bush in 2000. I know, I know....my sincerest apologies go to all planet Earth citizens.



    My vote in 2004 will go to whoever wins

    the Democratic nomination. Unless

    it's Liebermann!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.