ye obligatory "if the presidential election were now" poll

13»

Comments

  • Reply 41 of 44
    shawnjshawnj Posts: 6,656member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Kickaha

    Pow. Right back to either-or two-party politics.



    Bleah.




    Did we ever leave two-party politics? In a way, *we* are responsible for the two-party system by compromising our ideal candidate for the most electable candidate (closest to our own views). That's exactly what happens a lot of the time. Yeah, it's our fault, but it'll continue like this until we initiate major reform. Duverger's Law states that winner-take-all plurality voting naturally leads to a two party system. I place ultimate blame on the system itself.
  • Reply 42 of 44
    giantgiant Posts: 6,041member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by CosmoNut

    It's called a Republic, not a Democracy.



    It's a democratic republic. Are there any governments that are pure democracies? I don't think so.
  • Reply 43 of 44
    paulpaul Posts: 5,278member
    back in 500BC Athens there was
  • Reply 44 of 44
    gilschgilsch Posts: 1,995member
    I'm still laughing .... AO "ultra-liberal"???

    Not just liberal, but ultra-liberal.

    How far to the right would someone

    have to be to find this place ultra-liberal?





    I voted for Bush in 2000. I know, I know....my sincerest apologies go to all planet Earth citizens.



    My vote in 2004 will go to whoever wins

    the Democratic nomination. Unless

    it's Liebermann!
Sign In or Register to comment.