All the bus speeds are wrong compared to the clock speed of the processors. I doubt Apple or IBM would change it like that.
So, they're terrible fakes.
This is not a fake! I know a guy at Apple see. And, uh, he sent me one to test.....yeah to test, that's the ticket and, uh, it's in my office right now and, uh, it's really FAST. But that's all I can say right now except you're right about the bus speed- it actually runs at the same speed as the processor- sometimes even faster!
This is not a fake! I know a guy at Apple see. And, uh, he sent me one to test.....yeah to test, that's the ticket and, uh, it's in my office right now and, uh, it's really FAST. But that's all I can say right now except you're right about the bus speed- it actually runs at the same speed as the processor- sometimes even faster!
Move on people, nothing to be seen but a bad fake...
Obvious fake. Firstly, it clearly stats "up to 2GHZ" in the lower left hand corner. Second, there is no mention of Garageband in the iLife bundle. Surely a new PowerMac G5 would come with iLife '04 and not the previous version. Third, I think the 2.6 GHZ would fit in at $2999 like the current one. I don't see Apple raising the price on their high end machine, especially since these chips are cheap than the 130nm ones. If anything, a $100 to $200 price cut at the top may happen because these new machines will be cheaper to manufacture.
Comments
Originally posted by ipodandimac
i was checking out the apple store and BAM! there they were...
http://www.spymac.com/gallery/show_p...hp?picid=74606
fake
Okay, lets get crazy a bit. If the price structure is really like this I think there should be a new model fitting between the PM and iMac line....
Think G5 Cube
Originally posted by MagicFingers
fake
Never
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
In Before Lock™
and a bad one at that...
look at the FSB ratings in each model...
Whoever made this pic does not know the FSB/CPU speed relationship that well...
Also of note is that they are all dual... not a great move...
Sooooo....
In before lock!
YaY!!!
So, they're terrible fakes.
Originally posted by \\/\\/ickes
Fake...
and a bad one at that...
look at the FSB ratings in each model...
Whoever made this pic does not know the FSB/CPU speed relationship that well...
Also of note is that they are all dual... not a great move...
Sooooo....
In before lock!
YaY!!!
i really think hey'll go all dual, but still have 2 low end models: maybe dual 1.8 and SINGLE 2 or something.. i dunno
Originally posted by mattyj
All the bus speeds are wrong compared to the clock speed of the processors. I doubt Apple or IBM would change it like that.
So, they're terrible fakes.
This is not a fake! I know a guy at Apple see. And, uh, he sent me one to test.....yeah to test, that's the ticket and, uh, it's in my office right now and, uh, it's really FAST. But that's all I can say right now except you're right about the bus speed- it actually runs at the same speed as the processor- sometimes even faster!
Originally posted by tman
This is not a fake! I know a guy at Apple see. And, uh, he sent me one to test.....yeah to test, that's the ticket and, uh, it's in my office right now and, uh, it's really FAST. But that's all I can say right now except you're right about the bus speed- it actually runs at the same speed as the processor- sometimes even faster!
Move on people, nothing to be seen but a bad fake...
Knappa
Originally posted by DHagan4755
I faked it once too...but at least I admit to faking it
[/img]
hehe
Originally posted by tman
This is not a fake! ... you're right about the bus speed- it actually runs at the same speed as the processor- sometimes even faster!
Do you mean to say that my iMac 450 has FSB even slower than the CPU??!!
Originally posted by costique
Do you mean to say that my iMac 450 has FSB even slower than the CPU??!!
You're sarcastic I hope?
Bus speeds dont sync with processor speeds.
if it were :
2.0 Ghz ->1Ghz bus
2.2 Ghz ->1.1 Ghz bus
2.4 Ghz ->1.2 Ghz bus
then id hope for those specs....
Cheers.
Originally posted by Zapchud
You're sarcastic I hope?
ditto