That would probably be a SINGLE G5, remember, the 2.0 speed is achieved with 2 processors. I assume that the 130nm could achieve the 2.0 speed with only one processor, but it would be too hot. I would be willing to bet that the 90nm could hit speeds higher than 2.5ghz with only a single processor. It's gonna be sweet when the Rev. 2s come out.
That would probably be a SINGLE G5, remember, the 2.0 speed is achieved with 2 processors. I assume that the 130nm could achieve the 2.0 speed with only one processor, but it would be too hot. I would be willing to bet that the 90nm could hit speeds higher than 2.5ghz with only a single processor. It's gonna be sweet when the Rev. 2s come out.
That would probably be a SINGLE G5, remember, the 2.0 speed is achieved with 2 processors. I assume that the 130nm could achieve the 2.0 speed with only one processor, but it would be too hot. I would be willing to bet that the 90nm could hit speeds higher than 2.5ghz with only a single processor. It's gonna be sweet when the Rev. 2s come out.
That would probably be a SINGLE G5, remember, the 2.0 speed is achieved with 2 processors. I assume that the 130nm could achieve the 2.0 speed with only one processor, but it would be too hot. I would be willing to bet that the 90nm could hit speeds higher than 2.5ghz with only a single processor. It's gonna be sweet when the Rev. 2s come out.
I see someone failed their English comprehension test.
j/k, but I thought the verbiage on Apple's website of "dual 2GHZ processors" was quite specific about the fact that there are two processors with each one running at 2.0GHz.
I mean, if they can make a SINGLE 1.8GHz, what makes you think that 2GHz is impossible?
Comments
Unacceptable. I am getting a DELL!
Originally posted by Leonis
What? Only 2.5GHz. That's BS! Intel is at 3.2+ GHz
Unacceptable. I am getting a DELL!
3.4Ghz is now available, isn't it.
Originally posted by oldmacfan
3.4Ghz is now available, isn't it.
I can't recall where, but I think I read last week it's been delayed another month. Or was that 3.6? Who can say, I don't know squat!
I'm also putting my vote in for two weeks away.
And Steve is a Movie guy and hmmm...I smell a rumor...
Originally posted by oldmacfan
That is also Oscar night in Hollywood, and it is also the second biggest day for commercials (After the Super Bowl).
And Steve is a Movie guy and hmmm...I smell a rumor...
that would be too awesome
Originally posted by Leonis
What? Only 2.5GHz. That's BS! Intel is at 3.2+ GHz
Unacceptable. I am getting a DELL!
you're such a funny guy...you're kidding, right...?
Originally posted by mattjohndrow
you're such a funny guy...you're kidding, right...?
No, he just heard that Motorola will become Dell's sole supplier, and he can't wait to ditch Apple and support his favorite CPU vendor.
Originally posted by Amorph
No, he just heard that Motorola will become Dell's sole supplier, and he can't wait to ditch Apple and support his favorite CPU vendor.
Originally posted by DMBand0026
That would probably be a SINGLE G5, remember, the 2.0 speed is achieved with 2 processors. I assume that the 130nm could achieve the 2.0 speed with only one processor, but it would be too hot. I would be willing to bet that the 90nm could hit speeds higher than 2.5ghz with only a single processor. It's gonna be sweet when the Rev. 2s come out.
Huh?
Originally posted by fred_lj
Okay, but a LEAP in performance? I guess I am really missing something about the 970FX...just want a G5 PowerBook before the end of this year.
ah, G 5 p o w e r b o o k
me too
Originally posted by Flounder
I can't recall where, but I think I read last week it's been delayed another month. Or was that 3.6? Who can say, I don't know squat!
The 3.4E (Prescott) is delayed. The 3.4 (Northwood) is shipping.
Originally posted by DMBand0026
That would probably be a SINGLE G5, remember, the 2.0 speed is achieved with 2 processors. I assume that the 130nm could achieve the 2.0 speed with only one processor, but it would be too hot. I would be willing to bet that the 90nm could hit speeds higher than 2.5ghz with only a single processor. It's gonna be sweet when the Rev. 2s come out.
Ummm....those G5s are 2.0 GHz EACH!
Originally posted by Derrick 61
Ummm....those G5s are 2.0 GHz EACH!
Wait... I thought dual processor == dual GHz.
Originally posted by gfeier
Huh?
He has access to some pretty good "emergency medicine."
Originally posted by DMBand0026
That would probably be a SINGLE G5, remember, the 2.0 speed is achieved with 2 processors. I assume that the 130nm could achieve the 2.0 speed with only one processor, but it would be too hot. I would be willing to bet that the 90nm could hit speeds higher than 2.5ghz with only a single processor. It's gonna be sweet when the Rev. 2s come out.
I see someone failed their English comprehension test.
j/k, but I thought the verbiage on Apple's website of "dual 2GHZ processors" was quite specific about the fact that there are two processors with each one running at 2.0GHz.
I mean, if they can make a SINGLE 1.8GHz, what makes you think that 2GHz is impossible?