And Hilton is a slutty whore. I wouldn't touch that with a 10 and a half foot pole. She's ugly too...who is gonna pay $50 bucks for a video of an ugly whore having sex with some guy? Thats what pr0n sites are for.
She's not really that ugly, I swear. . .
Then again. . . . 4 years of Princeton goggles. (which I've heard aren't nearly as dark as Harvard, Columbia, Dartmouth, Cornell, Brown, Penn, or especially Yale goggles.)
I anticipate the day we stop calling women "bitches," "sluts," "whores," and "skanks."
What if they deserve it? Paris does, she video taped herself having sex outside of marriage, and she is known for her party girl type persona. She is a slut. If she didn't deserve the title I would stick up for her, but she does deserve it.
Somewhere between posting guidelines numbers 5 and 11, I don't think we're given the privilege to post or say where exactly to get the video on this board.
An admin or other mod may correct me if I'm wrong.
I read the second quote as I was scrolling down the page, it freaked me out! I said to myself, "wow, you've really done it this time moron. RE-READ YOUR POSTS BEFORE YOU SEND THEM!!!"
Glad I didn't type that though, you had me worried for a second there
What if they deserve it? Paris does, she video taped herself having sex outside of marriage, and she is known for her party girl type persona. She is a slut. If she didn't deserve the title I would stick up for her, but she does deserve it.
A nun is a woman who dedicates her life to the Church, and the similar activity of pursuing and promoting the word of God. So I would say that she is indeed deserving of the title if she exhibits the traits given by the definition.
Quite plainly, stop being a fool. Civility has never been my thing, so I'm going to tell you to grow some brain cells and call me in the morning.
Here's one for "fool" - Someone who acts in a ridiculous, ignorant manner.
Don't try to revise the English language. It works. I'm sorry if it hurts you sometimes. That's life. most people get back up and are stronger for it. You just whine.
Someone's defending the use of the word "slut" and you're not only defending him, but being a belligerent ass about it? I participated in my fair share of flame wars in my 4000 posts here, but I've grown disillusioned with them. If you want to respond substantively for the use of the word "slut," be my guest. I'm more than willing to fight back, buddy. And I thought my post was tongue-in-cheek, rather than your dumb literal interpretation that obviously missed the point.
Quite plainly, stop being a fool. Civility has never been my thing, so I'm going to tell you to grow some brain cells and call me in the morning.
Don't try to revise the English language. It works. I'm sorry if it hurts you sometimes. That's life. most people get back up and are stronger for it. You just whine.
Civility may not be your thing Splinemodel and that is fine but you must follow the posting guidlines here at AI if you wish to participate.
Men have similar names. Playboys, lechers, "shady guys." As far as occupational descriptions, there's nothing wrong with the term "whore." As far as describing a shrewy, manipulative woman, nothing fits like "bitch." It also can fit for a persistent complainer. As far as a loose, morally questionable woman, nothing sums it up better than "slut." A "skank" is basically a slut with a smaller bank account.
I think that these terms are mostly used correctly, or at least very close to truthful situations.
Paris Hilton is definitely a slut. We have film evidence for this. She doesn't seem like too much of a bitch, but then again I haven't really met her. More of a bimbo, really. And despite her wealth she is certainly skanky.
By the way, stop being such a whiny bitch all the time.
This is one of the ways that that patriarchy works. To this manly man and to much of society I'm less of a man because I believe in strong women's rights. In this case, I want to discourage repressive designations of women- especially sexually active women. A slut is a sexually active woman with usually more than one partner.
First, "slut" represents such an inclusive definition that it can never be used "correctly." You've heard it used a million times in a million different ways to describe many different situations. "Slutty clothes" can describe any kind of revealing attire. "Slutty girl" can describe any sexually active woman. It's just not exclusive enough to be useful.
Second, it has a clearly negative connotation. That is, for a women to be sexually active is frowned up and discouraged through oppressive labels like "slut." It operates like I described before.
Third, there is no male equivalent of a "slut." "Playboy" or more recently, "Player," have clearly positive connotations that reinforce the double standard. I'm not arguing for the female standard here. No way would I want to be considered a "slut" just for having sex. In this case, I want the male standard to become universal in society- where it is accepted for both sexes and all genders to have sex as freely as they want without fear of oppression.
Paris Hilton shouldn't be derided as a "slut" just because she's had sex- or even videotaped herself having sex. The language sometimes just doesn't operate in a way that I find acceptable, so obviously I'm going to advocate changing it. If there's something you find wrong with that, I'd like to know. I might start a thread on gender-neutral pronouns if you're.....interested.
BTW: if anyone DL'ed the new paris hilton tape lemme know.....
I think the thing is... who cares? I seriously doubt he walks around ruthlessly calling girls "slut" "skunk" etc to their faces. I could be wrong, however. Not really worth calling society as a whole into question over either way. It's a thread on the interweb.
Comments
Originally posted by DMBand0026
Kerry now? Do tell!
And Hilton is a slutty whore. I wouldn't touch that with a 10 and a half foot pole. She's ugly too...who is gonna pay $50 bucks for a video of an ugly whore having sex with some guy? Thats what pr0n sites are for.
She's not really that ugly, I swear. . .
Then again. . . . 4 years of Princeton goggles. (which I've heard aren't nearly as dark as Harvard, Columbia, Dartmouth, Cornell, Brown, Penn, or especially Yale goggles.)
Originally posted by ShawnJ
I anticipate the day we stop calling women "bitches," "sluts," "whores," and "skanks."
You forgot 'broads'.
Originally posted by Splinemodel
Now I'm not going to knock on you guys, but if Paris Hilton weren't a slutty moron, I'd say she'd be a pretty damn good catch.
If Paris Hilton weren't a slutty moron, she wouldn't be Paris Hilton any more, would she?
Originally posted by ShawnJ
I anticipate the day we stop calling women "bitches," "sluts," "whores," and "skanks."
What if they deserve it? Paris does, she video taped herself having sex outside of marriage, and she is known for her party girl type persona. She is a slut. If she didn't deserve the title I would stick up for her, but she does deserve it.
Originally posted by DMBand0026
I would stick up for her
I swear, when I first read that line, it looked just like it said:
I would stick it up her
"Paging Dr. Freud.... Dr. Freud to AO, please, STAT"
MODS - apologies in advance if this is too R-rated....
An admin or other mod may correct me if I'm wrong.
Originally posted by FormerLurker
[snip]
I read the second quote as I was scrolling down the page, it freaked me out! I said to myself, "wow, you've really done it this time moron. RE-READ YOUR POSTS BEFORE YOU SEND THEM!!!"
Glad I didn't type that though, you had me worried for a second there
Originally posted by DMBand0026
What if they deserve it? Paris does, she video taped herself having sex outside of marriage, and she is known for her party girl type persona. She is a slut. If she didn't deserve the title I would stick up for her, but she does deserve it.
Is this your idea of a deserving woman?
Originally posted by ShawnJ
Is this your idea of a deserving woman?
That's my idea of a nun.
A nun is a woman who dedicates her life to the Church, and the similar activity of pursuing and promoting the word of God. So I would say that she is indeed deserving of the title if she exhibits the traits given by the definition.
Quite plainly, stop being a fool. Civility has never been my thing, so I'm going to tell you to grow some brain cells and call me in the morning.
Here's one for "fool" - Someone who acts in a ridiculous, ignorant manner.
Don't try to revise the English language. It works. I'm sorry if it hurts you sometimes. That's life. most people get back up and are stronger for it. You just whine.
Originally posted by Splinemodel
I'm anticipating the day you grow a pair.
and
Quite plainly, stop being a fool. Civility has never been my thing, so I'm going to tell you to grow some brain cells and call me in the morning.
Don't try to revise the English language. It works. I'm sorry if it hurts you sometimes. That's life. most people get back up and are stronger for it. You just whine.
Civility may not be your thing Splinemodel and that is fine but you must follow the posting guidlines here at AI if you wish to participate.
Fellows
Originally posted by Splinemodel
I'm anticipating the day you grow a pair.
Aaaaanyway.
Men have similar names. Playboys, lechers, "shady guys." As far as occupational descriptions, there's nothing wrong with the term "whore." As far as describing a shrewy, manipulative woman, nothing fits like "bitch." It also can fit for a persistent complainer. As far as a loose, morally questionable woman, nothing sums it up better than "slut." A "skank" is basically a slut with a smaller bank account.
I think that these terms are mostly used correctly, or at least very close to truthful situations.
Paris Hilton is definitely a slut. We have film evidence for this. She doesn't seem like too much of a bitch, but then again I haven't really met her. More of a bimbo, really. And despite her wealth she is certainly skanky.
By the way, stop being such a whiny bitch all the time.
This is one of the ways that that patriarchy works. To this manly man and to much of society I'm less of a man because I believe in strong women's rights. In this case, I want to discourage repressive designations of women- especially sexually active women. A slut is a sexually active woman with usually more than one partner.
First, "slut" represents such an inclusive definition that it can never be used "correctly." You've heard it used a million times in a million different ways to describe many different situations. "Slutty clothes" can describe any kind of revealing attire. "Slutty girl" can describe any sexually active woman. It's just not exclusive enough to be useful.
Second, it has a clearly negative connotation. That is, for a women to be sexually active is frowned up and discouraged through oppressive labels like "slut." It operates like I described before.
Third, there is no male equivalent of a "slut." "Playboy" or more recently, "Player," have clearly positive connotations that reinforce the double standard. I'm not arguing for the female standard here. No way would I want to be considered a "slut" just for having sex. In this case, I want the male standard to become universal in society- where it is accepted for both sexes and all genders to have sex as freely as they want without fear of oppression.
Paris Hilton shouldn't be derided as a "slut" just because she's had sex- or even videotaped herself having sex. The language sometimes just doesn't operate in a way that I find acceptable, so obviously I'm going to advocate changing it. If there's something you find wrong with that, I'd like to know. I might start a thread on gender-neutral pronouns if you're.....interested.
BTW: if anyone DL'ed the new paris hilton tape lemme know.....
Originally posted by Splinemodel
Men have similar names. Playboys, lechers, "shady guys."
Really? Which one of those is the equivalent of bitch, slut, or whore? Any of those regarded as profanity?
Cheers
Scott
a little searching on acquisition a few months ago (and a few mislabeled dead ends) netted a 40+Mb version
that "Original Paris Hilton Sex Tape" (which... um... i deleted after it mysteriously appeared on my machine)
included some full colour at the beginning and at least 25 minutes of nightshot action
these dudes must not know how to search
and while i'd hardly claim to be an expert, it seemed below average pr0n