Well how about this then "It's good to be rich, but not too rich." ie Rich enough that you can drive kick ass cars, but not so rich as to attract the crazy types. Didn't Jobs have a problem with someone he fired? The guy threw rocks at him or something.
But you can always be mildly rich and attractive and that will get the job done. But don't be ugly, poor, and 59...no 34-year-old hottied will look your way.
She can pass off that Kelly bag to me when it isn't trendy anymore.
Comments
"Hi, I'm Sharon".
"Oh, uh...well, I'm Paul. I, uh...I own three jets and 1/3 of Tahiti, and I blow my nose with C-notes for giggles..."
*ZIP*
|
Well how about this then "It's good to be rich, but not too rich." ie Rich enough that you can drive kick ass cars, but not so rich as to attract the crazy types. Didn't Jobs have a problem with someone he fired? The guy threw rocks at him or something.
She can pass off that Kelly bag to me when it isn't trendy anymore.
Hi Dave,
Thanks for the note. Melanie tells me that she mistakenly said it was a
G5 and it is indeed a G4. I wrote a correction and it is supposed to
run
this coming Sunday.
Thanks,
Carolyne Zinko
Originally posted by DHagan4755
I got a reply from the author of the article:
While that sux! I was thinkin that there really was a PB G5 But what if melanie is saying that its a mistake when really its not
Originally posted by numberonemacboy
While that sux! I was thinkin that there really was a PB G5 But what if melanie is saying that its a mistake when really its not
Theories in theories in theories. My head is spinning with multiple conspiracy theories