Do you think Michael Jackson guilty

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in General Discussion edited January 2014
As the title says do you think Michael Jackson is guilty
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 25
    drewpropsdrewprops Posts: 2,321member
    Of what, ruining his face? Absolutely!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 25
    quagmirequagmire Posts: 558member
    I just want to point out that I voted for the wrong choice. If a mod or admins can come along and change my vote to Guilty. If possible.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 25
    giantgiant Posts: 6,041member
    you crack me up, kiddo
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 25
    nebagakidnebagakid Posts: 2,692member
    He may be guilty..





    but did he do something that wrong?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 25
    murbotmurbot Posts: 5,262member
    If we don't have a New Member of The Month award, we ****ing should.



    Rock on dude. I'll change your vote for you, just because I love you.



    8)
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 25
    jubelumjubelum Posts: 4,490member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Nebagakid

    He may be guilty..





    but did he do something that wrong?




    Man, talk about wearing a ha-uuuge bullseye on your head... with that "THAT wrong" comment. Either (s)he's a child molester or thinks (s)he is Peter Pan. Either way it needs to be locked up.



    When do I get to start the "Do you think Quagmire is guilty" thread?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 25
    jubelumjubelum Posts: 4,490member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by murbot

    If we don't have a New Member of The Month award, we ****ing should.



    Rock on dude. I'll change your vote for you, just because I love you.



    8)




    You great big humanitarian...
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 25
    faust9faust9 Posts: 1,335member
    Vanity Fair did a scathing review of MJ and this fiasco a month or two ago. Its a pretty good article if you can get your hands on it.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 25
    ganondorfganondorf Posts: 573member
    I sure hope he's guilty. It'd be kind of a letdown after all the buildup.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 10 of 25
    spcmsspcms Posts: 407member
    For me it's quite obvious he's so not guilty that it's even not funny anymore. But i realise i'm in the minority with that opinion.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 11 of 25
    quagmirequagmire Posts: 558member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by SpcMs

    For me it's quite obvious he's so not guilty that it's even not funny anymore. But i realise i'm in the minority with that opinion.



    You are not in the minority. There is 15 votes for guilty and 4 votes innocent and 5 for do not care pass the beernuts.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 12 of 25
    a better question would be would you let your children hang out with him.



    the guy is a basket case, and his fall is going to be spectacular, whether he's found guilty or not.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 13 of 25
    dviantdviant Posts: 483member
    Pass the Jesus Juice? !!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 14 of 25
    Quote:

    Originally posted by SpcMs

    For me it's quite obvious he's so not guilty that it's even not funny anymore. But i realise i'm in the minority with that opinion.



    so you'd let your children hang with him, sleep-over even?

    enlighten me.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 15 of 25
    giantgiant Posts: 6,041member
    The man is innocent.

    Quote:

    Originally posted by superkarate monkeydeathcar

    so you'd let your children hang with him, sleep-over even?



    Oh hell no!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 16 of 25
    neoneo Posts: 271member
    Wouldn't it be cool if we could film one of those sleep-overs using a hidden camera..... 8)

    and then we wouldn't have this argument over "guilty or not"



    -Neø
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 17 of 25
    that's just it. his defense is" what's wrong with a 43 year old manchild sleeping with a child that's not related to him?"

    he clearly doesn't have a clue.....i never said whether i thought he was guilty or not......just that .....he doesn't have clue.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 18 of 25
    quagmirequagmire Posts: 558member
    The thing that has me convinced hes guilty is that he gives the kids drinks. So they can can get drunk so they won't be able to remember what happened( obvisously it didn't work). He lets the kids sleep in his bed with him. He's a freaken sycho!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 19 of 25
    He maybe a psycho, but I don't think he is guilty. It is all part of the tug-of-war between him and Sony's president.



    On a note, mentally retarded morons and money hungry whores who let their children within a mile of someone suspected of being a molester don't deserve justice.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 20 of 25
    Quote:

    Originally posted by talksense101

    He maybe a psycho, but I don't think he is guilty. It is all part of the tug-of-war between him and Sony's president.



    On a note, mentally retarded morons and money hungry whores who let their children within a mile of someone suspected of being a molester don't deserve justice.




    insensitive to say the least, don't abused children deserve justice, from and an abuser as well as a parent or guardian who puts them in harms way?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.