Obviously someone wasnt paying attention to a series in which the Pacers made mistakes and still completely dominated the series.
You're right, I wasn't paying attention to that series. Who was? And so....we're supposed to be impressed by teams that make mistakes now?
Quote:
No need to. I could care less what someone shoots when they take 2 foot shots and push people out of the way (commiting an offensive foul pretty much every time they touch the ball)
You cared enough to come in here and keep posting about Shaq and even make up stats. lol You just didn't have a clue what you were posting about obviously.
Quote:
If you didnt know already.....the NBA is a business. Makes sense they'd try to get the big market teams with superstar players in a position to win championships correct? Lakers winning means more money for Stern than the pacers doing so.
Here come the conspiracy theories again lol. Yeah, that's why Kobe and Shaq haven't been in foul trouble at all this series for example. Oh wait, they have. Hmmm.
its called hop on the wagon......kinda like how the Cavs sold out games this season because of Lebron James...you think any of those people cared about them last yr?? your team could have 3250238532908598325 fans for all I care......the majority of them are more than likely bandwagon fans
Do I think the Pacers would win 61 if they were in the Western Conference? Absolutely. Granted top to bottom the Western Conference is MUCH stronger, a good team is a good team.....and this team is for real. It doesnt matter where you play.
Indiana Pacers record vs. the West:
20-8= .714 winning percentage
Los Angeles Lakers conference record:
31-21= .596 winning percentage
The Pacers also slumped in the 2nd half a bit....they couldve easily won 65-67 games
@ "whining"......ok I will just call Faker "fans" arrogant then
P.S. Go Rockets
Pacers winning 61 games in the West. That's like saying Shaq would be a great 3 point shooter if he shot 3s, seeing how he is 1 for 3 career from behind the arc.
Comments
Originally posted by TigerWoods99
Hmm...Boston crappy & 10 games below .500? That sure is news to me.
Yeah, crappy. So crappy
they lost 10 more games than they wonall year. Get it now? I thought you said you were a long time fan? lolWhen you lose 10 more games than you win....(official NBA stats)
Obviously someone wasnt paying attention to a series in which the Pacers made mistakes and still completely dominated the series.
You're right, I wasn't paying attention to that series. Who was?
No need to. I could care less what someone shoots when they take 2 foot shots and push people out of the way (commiting an offensive foul pretty much every time they touch the ball)
You cared enough to come in here and keep posting about Shaq and even make up stats. lol You just didn't have a clue what you were posting about obviously.
If you didnt know already.....the NBA is a business. Makes sense they'd try to get the big market teams with superstar players in a position to win championships correct? Lakers winning means more money for Stern than the pacers doing so.
Here come the conspiracy theories again lol. Yeah, that's why Kobe and Shaq haven't been in foul trouble at all this series for example. Oh wait, they have. Hmmm.
Originally posted by TigerWoods99
its called hop on the wagon......kinda like how the Cavs sold out games this season because of Lebron James...you think any of those people cared about them last yr?? your team could have 3250238532908598325 fans for all I care......the majority of them are more than likely bandwagon fans
Do I think the Pacers would win 61 if they were in the Western Conference? Absolutely. Granted top to bottom the Western Conference is MUCH stronger, a good team is a good team.....and this team is for real. It doesnt matter where you play.
Indiana Pacers record vs. the West:
20-8= .714 winning percentage
Los Angeles Lakers conference record:
31-21= .596 winning percentage
The Pacers also slumped in the 2nd half a bit....they couldve easily won 65-67 games
P.S. Go Rockets
Pacers winning 61 games in the West. That's like saying Shaq would be a great 3 point shooter if he shot 3s, seeing how he is 1 for 3 career from behind the arc.
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
SEE YAO LATER!