You guys sure love to have your cake and eat it too.
/sarcasm on Iraq, Afghanistan, two different COUNTRIES, how could they ever be connected. /sarcasm off
No shit that these places aren't what we in the west would call nation-states. They are all little fiefdoms run by warlords and the biggest warlord is the leader. Amazing how this is forgotten when terrorists from Saudi Arabia are working in Afghanistan but couldn't possibly be working in Iraq. Idiots like you (I can call you that since you claim ignorance of everyone who ever disagrees with you in every thread) piss and moan about how Iraq is a different country than Afghanistan when bashing on the war effort, and then hypocritically bash on the fact that there really wasn't any central government/infrastructure/anything else to control the country with after we take out the leader/biggest warlord.
/sarcasm on
Then lastly you treat them as if they were all these things and why couldn't we recognize that these "countries" couldn't possibly be working together on terrorist acts or allowing and helping terrorist groups. (They are entirely different governments, duh!)Why don't we recognize that their large central governments said they weren't helping or allowing terrorism. I mean the president/biggest warlord spoke to his cousin and he said that there were no terrorists, so there must not be any.
So stop trying to have it both ways. They are tribes, run by warlords, that don't give a crap about borders, or these things we recognize as countries. (Thus the terrorists can easily go to Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Afghanistan, where ever the hell they want.) This means that the next time you are any other hypocritical asshold complains about "Why are we in Iraq when it's not Afghanistan" we will see you for the polically motivated piece of garbage you truly are.
/rant off
Nick
You are out of control bro. And also wrong.
If, as you say, they go everywhere and that is why we are in Iraq, then why aren't we just taking over the whole world?! . . . world domination would seem to be the logicall result of your 'rant' . . . is that the true color of your ideology?
BTW, why aren't we invading Packistan?! Clearly that is where OBL is . . . and there are "Warlords" there as well . . . ghasp
BTW, why aren't we invading Packistan?! Clearly that is where OBL is . . . and there are "Warlords" there as well . . . ghasp
Indeed. One of them currently runs the country. He crosses his heart and hopes to die if he doesn't turn the country over to the people "real soon now."
Comments
Originally posted by giant
Obviously. You need to brush up on what happened during the lead-up to the Iraq war.
Obviously this is yet another thread where you claim the opposing viewpoint is ignorant.
If you knew, what I knew, you would do what I do.
giant's daily logical fallacy. He things that all who do not think as he does are just ignorant.
Nick
Originally posted by trumptman
/rant on
OMG, you are so hypocritically funny.
You guys sure love to have your cake and eat it too.
/sarcasm on Iraq, Afghanistan, two different COUNTRIES, how could they ever be connected. /sarcasm off
No shit that these places aren't what we in the west would call nation-states. They are all little fiefdoms run by warlords and the biggest warlord is the leader. Amazing how this is forgotten when terrorists from Saudi Arabia are working in Afghanistan but couldn't possibly be working in Iraq. Idiots like you (I can call you that since you claim ignorance of everyone who ever disagrees with you in every thread) piss and moan about how Iraq is a different country than Afghanistan when bashing on the war effort, and then hypocritically bash on the fact that there really wasn't any central government/infrastructure/anything else to control the country with after we take out the leader/biggest warlord.
/sarcasm on
Then lastly you treat them as if they were all these things and why couldn't we recognize that these "countries" couldn't possibly be working together on terrorist acts or allowing and helping terrorist groups. (They are entirely different governments, duh!)Why don't we recognize that their large central governments said they weren't helping or allowing terrorism. I mean the president/biggest warlord spoke to his cousin and he said that there were no terrorists, so there must not be any.
So stop trying to have it both ways. They are tribes, run by warlords, that don't give a crap about borders, or these things we recognize as countries. (Thus the terrorists can easily go to Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Afghanistan, where ever the hell they want.) This means that the next time you are any other hypocritical asshold complains about "Why are we in Iraq when it's not Afghanistan" we will see you for the polically motivated piece of garbage you truly are.
/rant off
Nick
You are out of control bro. And also wrong.
If, as you say, they go everywhere and that is why we are in Iraq, then why aren't we just taking over the whole world?! . . . world domination would seem to be the logicall result of your 'rant' . . . is that the true color of your ideology?
BTW, why aren't we invading Packistan?! Clearly that is where OBL is . . . and there are "Warlords" there as well . . . ghasp
Originally posted by pfflam
BTW, why aren't we invading Packistan?! Clearly that is where OBL is . . . and there are "Warlords" there as well . . . ghasp
Indeed. One of them currently runs the country. He crosses his heart and hopes to die if he doesn't turn the country over to the people "real soon now."