You, sir, are the one who is wrong, and underhanded.
I hope that you asked yourself these questions before you posted:
1. Do I have proof of this thing I am accusing someone of?
2. Does it fit with the normal pattern and supported by other actions?
I bring these up, because you have totally ignored certain things to come to that conclusion. Have you ever known me to avoid controversy? I didn't think so. Do I hide behind the shield of anonymity? No to that one also.
If you must cast aspersions and seed doubt to get your ideas across, maybe you should reexamine your ideas. I really thought that there were some kind of gentlemen's rules at play here. However, Giant and now you have proven there is no level you won't sink to.
Congratulations. You just lowered the bar.
So I was wong about it being you . . . no need to get all pretentious on us 'yo have just lowered the bar' hahaha
The rest of what I said still stands however. . . . even the part about the good thing Bush did.
How did a dig on Bush get into this topic? Oh, I know why...
Actually your partner in crime broke the Bush seal. This was the third post(second response) to this thread:
Quote:
originall posted by NaplesX which you'd know if you read each post.
Why not US's, hell I will bet the "usuals" here will find a way to inject the possibility that Bush has some connection to this. Or maybe it is Condi Rice
So I was wong about it being you . . . no need to get all pretentious on us 'yo have just lowered the bar' hahaha
The rest of what I said still stands however. . . . even the part about the good thing Bush did.
Remeber that 'good thing' that I noticed Bush do. Well apparently he has taken it back. In an INTERVIEW he says: to quote the source where I found the quote:
Quote:
On May 26, President Bush took it back. "I never apologized to the Arab world," he proudly proclaimed. Bush tried to explain that he was sorry for the people who were humiliated, but that his sorrow should not be interpreted as an apology.
unbelievable . . . I thought I could find ONE, just one good thing and it turns out that it was not to be . . . .
Perhaps the ambulance drivers needed a security detail. Israeli troops tend to fire at anything that moves that is not Israeli, ambulances not excepted:
Perhaps the ambulance drivers needed a security detail. Israeli troops tend to fire at anything that moves that is not Israeli, ambulances not excepted:
Perhaps the ambulance drivers needed a security detail. Israeli troops tend to fire at anything that moves that is not Israeli, ambulances not excepted:
So we see a video of what is either a UN ambulance driver willingly giving a ride to a bunch of combatants OR is a bunch of combatants taking over the ambulance.
And SJO is here telling us the UN ambulance needs protection from the Israelis
Just wondering why anyone here would respond to a thread started by Scott, on the subject of Israel. You all do understand his convictions on all things Israel right? Why bother....
I can see one or two, maybe even 3 guys jumping into an ambulance to help their pal. But 5?
I don't think the UN is somehow willing providing cover for Palestinian gunmen, but those gunmen know exactly what they're doing when they all pile into those ambulances. It's an easy escape. They are using it for transport, even if the the other party is willingly involved or not.
I think that the unarmed medical personnel are supposed to order the armed gunmen to get the hell off of the ambulance, or else... right?
Scott did you understand that?
rageous you're exactly right. They're making sure their comrade is alright but still...you can see how much they value life when they strap TNT to themselves and blow up children. Moreso they are using it as a means of transportation. But what are the doctors supposed to do Scott, we're not all big "Bring it on!" tough guys like you Republicans ya know.
This is obviously a breach of international law. By some armed men. And possibly the driver. His willingness isn't quite clear however. But still it will be very harmful to the Palestinian Red Crescent.
I guess you were quite happy when you found this clip, Scott? Does it prove the true evil of all palelestinians?
This is obviously a breach of international law. By some armed men. And possibly the driver. His willingness isn't quite clear however. But still it will be very harmful to the Palestinian Red Crescent.
That is no breaching of international law. International law can only be broken by parties who sign and ractify said international law, and I don't think that irregular resistance fighters have signed or ractified that.
The UN-ambulance-driver can at least claim that if he hadn't driven them they would have killed him, so he is excused.
Well? The next time the Jewish State stops a UN ambulance saying they suspect it of transporting "gunmen" (or whatever term you prefer) remember this video.
Gilsh, plan to make a call on this one? I guess giant should be the first to tell'em to quit posting here and go back to school (or at least hit the library)? (I mean go visit it! Don't blow it up, Nightcrawler.)
Comments
Originally posted by NaplesX
You, sir, are the one who is wrong, and underhanded.
I hope that you asked yourself these questions before you posted:
1. Do I have proof of this thing I am accusing someone of?
2. Does it fit with the normal pattern and supported by other actions?
I bring these up, because you have totally ignored certain things to come to that conclusion. Have you ever known me to avoid controversy? I didn't think so. Do I hide behind the shield of anonymity? No to that one also.
If you must cast aspersions and seed doubt to get your ideas across, maybe you should reexamine your ideas. I really thought that there were some kind of gentlemen's rules at play here. However, Giant and now you have proven there is no level you won't sink to.
Congratulations. You just lowered the bar.
So I was wong about it being you . . . no need to get all pretentious on us 'yo have just lowered the bar' hahaha
The rest of what I said still stands however. . . . even the part about the good thing Bush did.
1) You can't neglect the simple fact that Bush has energized liberals in this country in was unprecedented in my lifetime.
2) Millions of people marched in opposition to him.
Originally posted by kneelbeforezod
What exactly are you implying here?
That's a good question that most likely will go unanswered.
Originally posted by midwinter
You know, I think Bush was right when he said he was a uniter and not a divider:
1) You can't neglect the simple fact that Bush has energized liberals in this country in was unprecedented in my lifetime.
2) Millions of people marched in opposition to him.
How did a dig on Bush get into this topic? Oh, I know why...
Originally posted by Randycat99
How did a dig on Bush get into this topic? Oh, I know why...
Actually your partner in crime broke the Bush seal. This was the third post(second response) to this thread:
originall posted by NaplesX which you'd know if you read each post.
Why not US's, hell I will bet the "usuals" here will find a way to inject the possibility that Bush has some connection to this. Or maybe it is Condi Rice
Originally posted by pfflam
So I was wong about it being you . . . no need to get all pretentious on us 'yo have just lowered the bar' hahaha
The rest of what I said still stands however. . . . even the part about the good thing Bush did.
Remeber that 'good thing' that I noticed Bush do. Well apparently he has taken it back. In an INTERVIEW he says: to quote the source where I found the quote:
On May 26, President Bush took it back. "I never apologized to the Arab world," he proudly proclaimed. Bush tried to explain that he was sorry for the people who were humiliated, but that his sorrow should not be interpreted as an apology.
unbelievable . . . I thought I could find ONE, just one good thing and it turns out that it was not to be . . . .
One link in many:
http://www.hoffman-info.com/palestine2.html
Originally posted by sammi jo
Perhaps the ambulance drivers needed a security detail. Israeli troops tend to fire at anything that moves that is not Israeli, ambulances not excepted:
One link in many:
http://www.hoffman-info.com/palestine2.html
Who is to say that they were not firing from the ambulance, in light of this new video?
Originally posted by sammi jo
Perhaps the ambulance drivers needed a security detail. Israeli troops tend to fire at anything that moves that is not Israeli, ambulances not excepted:
One link in many:
http://www.hoffman-info.com/palestine2.html
So we see a video of what is either a UN ambulance driver willingly giving a ride to a bunch of combatants OR is a bunch of combatants taking over the ambulance.
And SJO is here telling us the UN ambulance needs protection from the Israelis
I don't think the UN is somehow willing providing cover for Palestinian gunmen, but those gunmen know exactly what they're doing when they all pile into those ambulances. It's an easy escape. They are using it for transport, even if the the other party is willingly involved or not.
I think that the unarmed medical personnel are supposed to order the armed gunmen to get the hell off of the ambulance, or else... right?
Scott did you understand that?
rageous you're exactly right. They're making sure their comrade is alright but still...you can see how much they value life when they strap TNT to themselves and blow up children. Moreso they are using it as a means of transportation. But what are the doctors supposed to do Scott, we're not all big "Bring it on!" tough guys like you Republicans ya know.
I guess you were quite happy when you found this clip, Scott? Does it prove the true evil of all palelestinians?
Originally posted by New
This is obviously a breach of international law. By some armed men. And possibly the driver. His willingness isn't quite clear however. But still it will be very harmful to the Palestinian Red Crescent.
That is no breaching of international law. International law can only be broken by parties who sign and ractify said international law, and I don't think that irregular resistance fighters have signed or ractified that.
The UN-ambulance-driver can at least claim that if he hadn't driven them they would have killed him, so he is excused.
Nightcrawler
Well? The next time the Jewish State stops a UN ambulance saying they suspect it of transporting "gunmen" (or whatever term you prefer) remember this video.
Originally posted by Nightcrawler
...ractified...
Gilsh, plan to make a call on this one?
Originally posted by New
This is obviously a breach of international law. By some armed men. And possibly the driver. His willingness isn't quite clear however.
Oh please people...stop it. The Palestinians HIJACKED (something they know very fuckin' well to do) and they
HAD GUNS.
"Take us to the hospital or we'll blow your United Nations head off!"
"Ok."
/stupiddumbasstopic
Originally posted by Randycat99
Hey, do these ambulances have video recorders (like police cars)? Seems like a good thing to have built-in.