Pics of my new 20" Cinema Display!

2»

Comments

  • Reply 21 of 40
    emaneman Posts: 7,204member
    All I can say is wow.
  • Reply 22 of 40
    bostonmhbostonmh Posts: 97member
    Already filed my taxes so in about 2-3 weeks a dual 1.25 and that 20" display are mine.
  • Reply 23 of 40
    mr. fantasticmr. fantastic Posts: 123member
    [quote]Originally posted by MCQ:

    <strong>Well, if you're willing to spend $200 more I think the 22" Cinema displays are floating around for $1500, and they run at 1600x1200 I think.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    I got one from Smalldog for $1378!

    They are all gone now...
  • Reply 24 of 40
    spiffsterspiffster Posts: 327member
    Makes my iMacs 15" display look like dogcow droppings. Now we know why we buy everything from Apple. Very nice price too.
  • Reply 25 of 40
    horned_froghorned_frog Posts: 577member
    I was at the Highland Park, TX store tonight...came THIS close to buying a 23" (looked at the 20" too) but just couldn't pull the trigger. Man, I wish I would have bought it now. Should I? DO you guys think it is still going to be a high quality monitor 2-3 years from now? Is ti THAT good?
  • Reply 26 of 40
    emaneman Posts: 7,204member
    [quote]Originally posted by Horned_Frog:

    <strong>I was at the Highland Park, TX store tonight...came THIS close to buying a 23" (looked at the 20" too) but just couldn't pull the trigger. Man, I wish I would have bought it now. Should I? DO you guys think it is still going to be a high quality monitor 2-3 years from now? Is ti THAT good?</strong><hr></blockquote>

    Definately go for it. Why wouldn't it still be high quality 2-3 years from now?
  • Reply 27 of 40
    wormboywormboy Posts: 220member
    I bought two of the 20"ers yesterday, along with a dual 1.42 G4. Sigh... 4 weeks! Your pictures are making me drool in anticipation!
  • Reply 28 of 40
    horned_froghorned_frog Posts: 577member
    You have a very sweet setup dude...I like how clean it is...hope you didn't just tidy it up for the picture!
  • Reply 29 of 40
    murbotmurbot Posts: 5,262member
    Holy crap... over 7000 hits on that page!



    BTW, I really like that setup of yours... I'm drooling over here.



  • Reply 30 of 40
    rosettastonedrosettastoned Posts: 154member
    Just a side note, I'm reaching 10,000 hits on that page, and my .Mac homepage hasn't gone down once due to "excessive traffic".



    I wonder if Apple has changed their policy on .Mac user traffic....anyone have any insight? When I first got .Mac I had a few pages that caused it to be taken down for long periods at a time.



    I'm sorry I haven't taken more pics or responded to everyone. I actually got over 200 e-mails from strangers that I've been trying to respond to. 20 alone just wanted to know where I got my desk. 5 told me my desk sucks. Lots of strange comments and questions.



    No, I didn't just tidy up for the picture. I'm a very clean person in general. Thanks for all your comments!



    ----------

    RosettaStoned
  • Reply 31 of 40
    kennethkenneth Posts: 832member
    I agree. Your site is very popular even my fd in Hong Kong sent me your URL to me. Too bad, I can only afford the 17" studio display so far
  • Reply 32 of 40
    serranoserrano Posts: 1,806member
    Well, you are showcasing new Apple hardware through Apple's own services.



  • Reply 33 of 40
    burningwheelburningwheel Posts: 1,827member
    man the packaging for my 23" was abused, luckily it works like a charm thanks FedEx <img src="graemlins/oyvey.gif" border="0" alt="[oyvey]" /> as a matterof fact, so was dual gig box <img src="confused.gif" border="0">
  • Reply 34 of 40
    dubmagedubmage Posts: 1member
    Sweet display! Any pixel anomalies on that baby?
  • Reply 35 of 40
    rosettastonedrosettastoned Posts: 154member
    Nope, no pixel anomalies at all! Absolutely perfect. I still can't get over how bright it is....



    -------------

    RosettaStoned
  • Reply 36 of 40
    ben_kben_k Posts: 7member
    What's the response time on that like? I hear the old 17" and 23" ones have huge (70ms?) response time, which leads to artifacting and ghosting of images.



    Which is a bummer, as it's meant for video editing, and you have something slower that a snail driving an image.



    Games? How are they like?



    Ben
  • Reply 37 of 40
    serpentfruitserpentfruit Posts: 59member
    Unfortunately, Apple's Tech Spec page doesn't list the new monitor's pixel response time. The web-site does state however that pixel response time is "lightening fast." Off the top of my head I don't know what the speed of lightning is, but that is one gorgeous monitor.



    Anybody want to buy a 15-month old 17" Apple LCD with 3 pixels stuck on white - $US400?
  • Reply 38 of 40
    coolmaccoolmac Posts: 259member
    The pixel response time is 40ms, according to the comparison chart on Formac's web site comparing the Formac 2010 to the 20" Apple display.
  • Reply 39 of 40
    leonisleonis Posts: 3,427member
    I read a post from someone at macrumors.com



    that person said the response time for the



    20" -------- 23ms typical and 36 max



    22" --------- 40ms typical and 60ms max



    Forgot the 23" <img src="embarrassed.gif" border="0">
  • Reply 40 of 40
    bartobarto Posts: 2,246member
    [quote]Originally posted by Ben_K:

    <strong>What's the response time on that like? I hear the old 17" and 23" ones have huge (70ms?) response time, which leads to artifacting and ghosting of images.



    Which is a bummer, as it's meant for video editing, and you have something slower that a snail driving an image.



    Games? How are they like?



    Ben</strong><hr></blockquote>



    After seeing Galactic Battlegrounds on a 20" (damn Lukas, he took the 20" and I had to use an eMac), I can say that is it FANTASTIC. Much more practical (size-wise) than the 23".



    Long response times don't cause ghosting, that's cause by the previous frame taking a long time to fade out.



    Barto
Sign In or Register to comment.