Apple releases Broadband Tuner 1.0

Posted:
in macOS edited January 2014
Apple today released Broadband Tuner 1.0, a new system utility designed to take full advantage of very high speed Internet connections that have a high latency (5 Mbps or greater). According to the documentation, the installer "tweaks some system parameters. There is an optional uninstaller that can be used to restore the settings that were in effect at the time just before the system parameters were changed....The installer increases the default values for the size of the TCP send and receive buffers. With larger buffers more data can be in transit at once. A startup configuration file is also updated so that these changes will persist across restarts."
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 24
    ringoringo Posts: 329member
    This was released yesterday, and it's not a utility.
  • Reply 2 of 24
    boogabooga Posts: 1,082member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Ringo

    This was released yesterday, and it's not a utility.



    I utilized it.
  • Reply 3 of 24
    19841984 Posts: 955member
    How is this different from Broadband Optimizer which has been out for years?



    I use these settings...



    \t/usr/sbin/sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.sendspace=64240 > /dev/null

    \t/usr/sbin/sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.recvspace=64240 > /dev/null

    \t/usr/sbin/sysctl -w kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=524288 > /dev/null

    \t/usr/sbin/sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack=0 > /dev/null

    \t/usr/sbin/sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.rfc1323=0 > /dev/null

    \t/usr/sbin/sysctl -w net.inet.udp.recvspace=73728 > /dev/null



    Also, unlike Apple's Broadband Tuner it works with 10.3 and earlier.
  • Reply 4 of 24
    It's not different at all. But Apple want to write every piece of software for OS X, so...
  • Reply 5 of 24
    kickahakickaha Posts: 8,760member
    Probably because any time Apple *doesn't* write a piece of software, even if there are third party solutions, people gripe.
  • Reply 6 of 24
    I never heard people griping about Broadband Tuner. Have you?
  • Reply 7 of 24
    Quote:

    Originally posted by 1984

    How is this different from Broadband Optimizer which has been out for years?



    I use these settings...



    \t/usr/sbin/sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.sendspace=64240 > /dev/null

    \t/usr/sbin/sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.recvspace=64240 > /dev/null

    \t/usr/sbin/sysctl -w kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=524288 > /dev/null

    \t/usr/sbin/sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack=0 > /dev/null

    \t/usr/sbin/sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.rfc1323=0 > /dev/null

    \t/usr/sbin/sysctl -w net.inet.udp.recvspace=73728 > /dev/null



    Also, unlike Apple's Broadband Tuner it works with 10.3 and earlier.




    Broadband Optimizer. Ill have to give it a try.

  • Reply 8 of 24
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Gene Clean

    It's not different at all. But Apple want to write every piece of software for OS X, so...



    Can Apple not offer a piece of software that does something that another piece of software does without people bitchin' 'bout it? I bet there are many "Optimizer" applications but you don't complain about them.
  • Reply 9 of 24
    Quote:

    Originally posted by fahlman

    Can Apple not offer a piece of software that does something that another piece of software does without people bitchin' 'bout it? I bet there are many "Optimizer" applications but you don't complain about them.



    I agree, and another plus of this is that it will ship standard on all macs most likely, so the tool is already in the hands of mac buyers, now they won't have to download it. I'm willing to bet a large percentage of people didn't even realize they needed a broadband optimizer/tuner. Now, more people will.
  • Reply 10 of 24
    ringoringo Posts: 329member
    What I find funny is that Apple is distributing this as an installer package as though it actually installs something. In reality the only file it installs is an empty dummy file in /tmp, and the installer script does the real work.
  • Reply 11 of 24
    louzerlouzer Posts: 1,054member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Gene Clean

    Can people criticize something Apple does without you coming here and playing the Apple apologist?









    Why would I? They're made by third-party developers. I want the developer community to continue to make software. I don't want them to give up because, you know, Apple will do it anyway.




    Wait, you're upset at apple for releasing a small utility that changes like three settings for internet access? Yet you're not upset that some shareware developer offers a tool for $15 that does basically the same thing. All it does is change some settings. This is like people charging 10 bucks for a utility to turn on the Debug menu in Safari, all for a pretty UI and one line of code.



    Of course, if you really want to get upset, I was in Best Buy with a friend the other day (no, wait, that's not what to get upset about, there's more), and he pointed out this $50 box called a "Internet TrafficCop Standby Switch", which, for $50, 'disconnects your PC from the internet to protect you from viruses". Wow! If only there were some other way to do this, like, I don't know...[list=a][*]Turn off the modem[*]Turn off the Router[*]Unplug either the modem or router[*]Turn off the computer[*]Unplug network cable from the modem/router/computer[/list=a]



    But no! We need a freakin' switch! I mean, who's this for? Idiots who don't know better. And why isn't anyone up in arms over the fleecing of the unwary computer user? Who knows. But for goodness sakes, Apple, don't release any utility that will make user's computers more responsive. No, that's a third-party's job.
  • Reply 12 of 24
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Gene Clean

    Can people criticize something Apple does without you coming here and playing the Apple apologist?[/i]



    I'm not apologizing. I'm saying that Apple can write anything they want without people cry-babying about it. I'm sure every third party developer has called an emergency meeting discussing if they should even unlock the doors tomorrow morning because Apple wrote a broadband optimizer application.
  • Reply 13 of 24
    Apple writes a email, web browser, media player, address book, calendar, chat, and file viewer application though there are many third party developers that write alternatives that make a good living doing so, but a broadband optimizer is going to bring and end to all third party development as we know it. Ha!
  • Reply 14 of 24
    Third party development for Mac OS X has greatly increased and you complain about a broadband optimizer. The Broadband Optimizer guy doesn't even charge for his application and he's going to go broke because of Apple Broadband Tuner 1.0.



    I even downloaded Broadband Optimizer 1.5 to try it out. If I think it's worth a couple bucks I'll send some to the guy.
  • Reply 15 of 24
    Quote:

    Originally posted by fahlman

    [B]Apple writes a email, web browser, media player, address book, calendar, chat, and file viewer application



    Ehem, and do you notice a trend here? Soon enough Apple will be writing every piece of app that resides on your dock.



    Quote:

    though there are many third party developers that write alternatives that make a good living doing so, but a broadband optimizer is going to bring and end to all third party development as we know it. Ha!



    I was pointing out that there exists a trend at Apple in writing apps that already exist. Re-inventing the wheel. That's all. Now go back to your Apple apologizing, my lad.
  • Reply 16 of 24
    lundylundy Posts: 4,466member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Ringo

    What I find funny is that Apple is distributing this as an installer package as though it actually installs something. In reality the only file it installs is an empty dummy file in /tmp, and the installer script does the real work.



    It writes the settings to /private/etc/sysctl.conf .



    Quote:

    Dual-G5:~ lundy$ sysctl -a | grep space

    net.local.stream.recvspace: 8192

    net.local.stream.sendspace: 8192

    net.local.dgram.recvspace: 4096

    net.inet.tcp.sendspace: 131072

    net.inet.tcp.recvspace: 358400

    net.inet.udp.recvspace: 42080

    net.inet.raw.recvspace: 8192



    Note the huge tcp recvspace.



    Also, if you have already messed with the settings, the installer won't run - I had to empty out the file /private/etc/sysctl.conf to get by the installer check.
  • Reply 17 of 24
    aplnubaplnub Posts: 2,605member
    Where is the uninstaller package located at?
  • Reply 18 of 24
    Quote:

    Originally posted by aplnub

    Where is the uninstaller package located at?



    When you run it a second time it undoes the changes it made the first time. You can verify this if you click the Customize button.
  • Reply 19 of 24
    lundylundy Posts: 4,466member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by aplnub

    Where is the uninstaller package located at?



    Run the installer again and there is an option to uninstall.



    OR - right click the package, choose Show Package Contents and you will find that it contains 2 packages, one for installing and another for un-installing. Then you can just double-click the un-installer.
  • Reply 20 of 24
    kickahakickaha Posts: 8,760member
    Guys, please take the econo-political discussion to another thread, and let's keep this one for the technical details, shall we?



    For instance: anyone seen a good speedup from this? Any problems?
Sign In or Register to comment.