New 4GB iPod nano fetches over $350 on eBay

Posted:
in iPod + iTunes + AppleTV edited January 2014
With Apple Computer now showing signs that it will fall far short of meeting overall holiday demand for the 4GB iPod nano, consumers eager to obtain the ultra-slim digital music player in time for Christmas have shown a willingness to pay over $350 (or 40-percent above retail).



In an eBay auction that ended just before noon on Wednesday, a brand new 4GB iPod sold for an eye-popping $355 -- $106 above its $249 manufacturer suggested retail price. Several similar 4GB iPod nano auctions remained open with bids near and over $300, suggesting they will also close near the $350 range.



The online bidding battle is heating up amongst reports that Apple has told some of its partners and authorized resellers that it cannot guarantee that new or recently filed orders for the 4GB nano will ship in time for Christmas. Similarly, the company has raised lead times on its own online store to 1 to 2 weeks for the 4GB model. The 2GB iPod nano remains available for shipment in 1 to 2 business days.



Consumers looking for a 4GB nano before Christmas will likely have better luck swinging by the closest Apple retail store -- outlets the company appears to be favoring, with new shipments arriving throughout the week in some locations.



All but one of a dozen Apple retail stores contacted on Tuesday afternoon said they had stock of both the black and white 2GB nano. Approximately 60-percent of the stores also showed inventory of the 4GB nano in black. However, none of the stores contacted were able to turn up a 4GB nano in white.



Those consumers who are not within driving distance to an Apple retail store may have the toughest time filling gift lists that include a 4GB nano. Major online retailers Amazon.com, Best Buy, Circuit City, and CDW have been sold out of the players for weeks.



Individual Apple Authorized Resellers, not designated as "Specialists," are fairing no better, with Apple's largest US-based channel distributor recently showing backlog (unprocessed orders) of almost 200,000 iPods, including nearly 100,000 nanos.



Optimistically, sources say Apple had hoped to ship between 10 and 12 million iPod nanos this quarter, but recently toned-down its internal forecast amidst component supply issues. Once such obstacle reportedly involved a shortage of a the Cypress chip used in the nano and video iPod's Apple-designed click-wheel.



As a result, Apple has reportedly mended ties with its old click-wheel supplier Synaptics, asking the company to act as a second click-wheel component supplier for nano production beginning December 15th and onward. Although Synaptic would not confirm that it is producing parts for iPods again, sources say the Synaptic's recent ramp orders to manufacturing facilities in Asia are "too large to be from any client other than Apple."



With the necessary measures being put in place to improve production, Apple representatives have begun to tell iPod resellers not to fret, and that they'll be plenty of iPod nanos to go around come January. Unfortunately for those resellers, the big bucks come before Christmas.



Analysts now expect Apple to sell between 9 million and 11.4 million iPods during the three-month period ending December 31st, which would also include sales of fifth-generation video iPods and iPod shuffles.
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 21
    boogabooga Posts: 1,082member
    This is a huge, huge problem for Apple. Every customer they lose is essentially locked out of the iPod once they invest in Rhapsody or another online music store. And forcing people to buy Creative MP3 players because they can't make enough is a good way to lose market share really fast. Let's hope Apple can find a way to ship these things before the market share starts eroding. It would be ironic for Apple's advertising to drive sales of Creative players because there's nothing else to buy.
  • Reply 2 of 21
    That's what happens when you leave your Christmas shopping to the last moment.
  • Reply 3 of 21
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Booga

    This is a huge, huge problem for Apple. Every customer they lose is essentially locked out of the iPod once they invest in Rhapsody or another online music store. And forcing people to buy Creative MP3 players because they can't make enough is a good way to lose market share really fast. Let's hope Apple can find a way to ship these things before the market share starts eroding. It would be ironic for Apple's advertising to drive sales of Creative players because there's nothing else to buy.



    Not entirely. I think, for the most part, people will wait until January and probably end up getting a gift certificate or something similar just because they want the Apple name and the Apple fashion.
  • Reply 4 of 21
    This could be a situation where living in hicksville and a majority of the local population not even knowing what an iPod is pays off.
  • Reply 5 of 21
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Booga

    This is a huge, huge problem for Apple. Every customer they lose is essentially locked out of the iPod once they invest in Rhapsody or another online music store. And forcing people to buy Creative MP3 players because they can't make enough is a good way to lose market share really fast.



    Not really. First of all, right now it's driving customers to Apple's own stores and the online store, which is actually a good thing for Apple. Secondly, scarcity of the resource adds to its fame. Having a gadget that everyone has isn't nearly as cool as having one that's hard to come by.



    This shortage has cost me way more than the value of an iPod today (see the stock price). Oh boy. But in the long run, it won't have that big of an impact.
  • Reply 6 of 21
    I'm glad I ordered my white 4gb nano a matter of minutes after seeing video of Steve Job's introducing it! First iPod I'd ever considered buying (never had an mp3 player before) but finally they pushed all the right buttons. I'd hate to be battling out on the high street for one of them now.
  • Reply 7 of 21
    It's like Cabbage Patch Kids all over again!



    This is great for Apple. They may miss some sales this Christmas because of supply, but the buzz is cementing the iPod nano as a must-have product. I hope Apple sticks with the nano form factor for a while and add colors and larger storage over the next six months or a year.



    The nano is about a small as an iPod can be and still be operated one-handed without breaking your thumb, so there's not much of a reason to continue trying to make it smaller and thinner.
  • Reply 8 of 21
    Even though I have an iPod, if I were a new customer I would wait for the next available iPod simply because iTunes is the best music player out there. I would not buy another company's player because of this.
  • Reply 9 of 21
    Why not just buy 2 2GB ones and keep one for yourself Or better yet big iPod, they are slim and sexy too. I was at one of my local Apple stores about a week ago and they had plenty of all models, granted they were flying off the shelves and they had security guarding their stash, but you could walk right up and buy one. Situation could be different today, but it pays to shop early. But more power to the eBay Power Sellers, where there is a market there is a profit...Off topic, but I'm glad to see the Apple stock making a little come back in later day trading, all because of one idiot analyst, it's because of these investor specialist morons that I sold half of my Apple stock a year ago...he wanted me to dump it all, and he never wanted me to buy it in the first place Needless to say I no longer deal with him.
  • Reply 10 of 21
    Is this late breaking news? By reading this article, it almost seems that AppleInsider jotted this down as quickly as they could to shove it onto the internet.



    Believe me, I love this site, but if you want to be considered a legitimate news source of an kind, maybe have someone proofread your stories before posting them. This article has so many typos. I've gotten articles from here by way of Google News... a little more precision would make this site look more credible.
  • Reply 11 of 21
    Quote:

    Originally posted by SAukland

    Is this late breaking news? By reading this article, it almost seems that AppleInsider jotted this down as quickly as they could to shove it onto the internet.



    Believe me, I love this site, but if you want to be considered a legitimate news source of an kind, maybe have someone proofread your stories before posting them. This article has so many typos. I've gotten articles from here by way of Google News... a little more precision would make this site look more credible.




    Have you read the NYT or WSJ recently? Everyone makes typos.
  • Reply 12 of 21
    My wife works at an Apple reseller in the UK, and they were promised a shipment of 800 nanos in the middle of November, then at the beginning of this month they promised 650, and this week Apple told them they weren't getting any, and were prioritising shipments to retailers such as Dixons, who don't give a crap about Apple and actively dissuade people from iPods the rest of the year.

    So, the lady has had to call about 70 people who pre-ordered last month to let them know their loved ones won't be getting any iJoy from them.
  • Reply 13 of 21
    aplnubaplnub Posts: 2,605member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by SAukland

    Is this late breaking news? By reading this article, it almost seems that AppleInsider jotted this down as quickly as they could to shove it onto the internet.



    Believe me, I love this site, but if you want to be considered a legitimate news source of an kind, maybe have someone proofread your stories before posting them. This article has so many typos. I've gotten articles from here by way of Google News... a little more precision would make this site look more credible.




    Check yourself a bit mate. On any given major website, CNN.com and Foxnews.com for examples, you will find major and minor typo's in almost every story published. It may not be cool, but that is online journalism as it stands today and really isn't that big of a compromise.
  • Reply 14 of 21
    boogabooga Posts: 1,082member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by krankerz

    Not entirely. I think, for the most part, people will wait until January and probably end up getting a gift certificate or something similar just because they want the Apple name and the Apple fashion.



    I think exactly the opposite. While people who post here would probably wait, no one else I know who isn't already an Apple fan would. The Creative Zen plays MP3s (ripped or stolen MP3s still constitutes almost all music put on these devices) and looks and costs similar enough.



    And the story is probably different around Christmas, as people would rather give a gift than wait until January and give an IOU for Christmas. The Mom buying for the kid isn't going to care THAT much about brand, and the S.O. is more likely to just buy TWO non-Apple ones so they both have the same kind.



    If Apple can't build them fast enough, it's going to cost them market share. And considering the lock-in nature of DRM, each loss will more than likely be permanent.
  • Reply 15 of 21
    Here's a funny bit of bluster from Mr. Gates. This came from IMDB.com...



    >>>Gates and Jobs To Face Off Over Online Music



    Bill Gates and Steve Jobs appeared to be heading towards a new showdown as Gates's Microsoft Corp. said Tuesday that it will join up with MTV Networks to launch a new online music service next year that will compete directly against Apple's iTunes Music Store. The announcement brought to mind the original battle between Jobs, a co-founder of Apple Computer, and Gates in the mid-1980s, when Microsoft took the lead in providing graphical computer systems for the masses. Microsoft and MTV said their new service will be called Urge and will offer both Ã* la carte and subscription pricing. It will not only provide standard music downloads, but music videos from MTV's vast library.<<<



    As far as I know, MTV does NOT own the rights to music videos, they own the rights to their own shows.



    Your comments please.
  • Reply 16 of 21
    xoolxool Posts: 2,460member
    I find the MTV comment funny because the record labels are as pissed at MTV as they are at Apple, except at least Apple is up front with the labels and is trying to help them fight piracy.



    What MTV brings to the table is cachet.



    Now if the MTV site embraced the iPod in some way that'd be another story and Apple wouldn't care since you'd still be buying an iPod. Don't hold your breath.
  • Reply 17 of 21
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Xool

    Now if the MTV site embraced the iPod in some way that'd be another story and Apple wouldn't care since you'd still be buying an iPod. Don't hold your breath.



    MS would never allow that.
  • Reply 18 of 21
    celcocelco Posts: 211member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Xool



    What MTV brings to the table is cachet.





    How so? MTV brings imho nothing except a brand. Now iTunes is THE brand. Watch iTunes hook up with BET and then we will see something interesting. MTV is sooo 1980.



    More to this post point is that if a item is fetching a price so much higher than its retail value then I think the christmas of 2005 will be the high point of the iPod brand.



    I fucking hate the fact that I was walking down the street when I was stopped my a dude who told me how cool the iPod was yet hated apple. Sometimes i liked better when apple as still a bit obscure... Yet at the same time if a few thousand idiots want to pay for apple to grow stronger to keep releasing awesome COMPUTERS in into that.
  • Reply 19 of 21
    ishawnishawn Posts: 364member
    And as with what many have already said, Christmas shopping at the last minute is bad enough. I bought my father's 2GB Nano a few days before Black Friday (That sticks out in mind because I also bought dotMac on Black Friday) when they have their sale and it was shipping within three days. Silly, silly people. I work in retail and the people look at me like it's my fault they're looking for a rare CD or DVD that is going to be ordered and more than likely will take more than two weeks to get here for Christmas.



    God, I love working with people.
  • Reply 20 of 21
    andersanders Posts: 6,523member
    If you think the Nano craze is wild try look at how people behave in any proximity to anything Xbox 360:



    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/12...photo_auction/
Sign In or Register to comment.