Anyone hear about this court battle?

2»

Comments

  • Reply 21 of 25
    benroethigbenroethig Posts: 2,782member
    Don't they? Music sales and music players see, like two different areas to me.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 22 of 25
    brussellbrussell Posts: 9,812member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by BenRoethig

    Don't they? Music sales and music players see, like two different areas to me.



    Did Apple already have a monopoly in one of those two areas and then use that monopoly to kill the competition in the other?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 23 of 25
    guarthoguartho Posts: 1,208member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by BenRoethig

    It's not about innovation, it's about whether keeping the protected ACC proprietary to the Mac



    *snip*



    Apple doing this is no different than Microsoft keeping a file type unique to PCs and using it as a leverage to keep a customer from buying a Mac.




    AAC is not proprietary to the Mac. It is proprietary to iTunes, which is available for Windows. AAC is not unique to the Mac so it is very different than Microsoft keeping a file type unique to PCs and using it as leverage to keep a customer from buying a Mac.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 24 of 25
    benroethigbenroethig Posts: 2,782member
    Notice I said PROTECTED ACC. I'm talking about .m4v files, not .m4a.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 25 of 25
    Um, isn't it AAC, bot ACC?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.