Does it really matter?.... Whether it's running at 250 or 400MHz.... there is no benefit having such integrated graphics module for anything other than running web browser and word processing software. what more do you think you can do if apple had included 600Mhz GMA950? not more....
I run a 3-D app (slowly) on my tablet PC with the even older GMA900. 250 vs 400 does matter given that's all you have to work with. Just because you can't play Doom 3 doesn't mean you can't do anything useful on a machine with integrated graphics.
Close though. I only get about 10fps in the app I'm using which is on the bottom end of usable. Comparatively speaking it should blaze on a MacBook with sufficient memory.
Comments
Originally posted by bitemymac
Does it really matter?.... Whether it's running at 250 or 400MHz.... there is no benefit having such integrated graphics module for anything other than running web browser and word processing software. what more do you think you can do if apple had included 600Mhz GMA950? not more....
I run a 3-D app (slowly) on my tablet PC with the even older GMA900. 250 vs 400 does matter given that's all you have to work with. Just because you can't play Doom 3 doesn't mean you can't do anything useful on a machine with integrated graphics.
Close though. I only get about 10fps in the app I'm using which is on the bottom end of usable. Comparatively speaking it should blaze on a MacBook with sufficient memory.
Vinea
Originally posted by gar
Things that make your pants hurt will cost you dearly.
(exception on this rule is probably your wife/girlfriend)
You're kidding right?
Vinea