real 1 os x: *confirmed*

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 18
    tulkastulkas Posts: 3,754member
    Don't like it on Windows, and no compelling reason to use it on my OSX box.
  • Reply 2 of 18
    donnydonny Posts: 231member
    Thank-you



    even if it is a Beta..downloading and trying it out NOW



  • Reply 3 of 18
    surfratsurfrat Posts: 341member
    It's about FREAKING time...
  • Reply 4 of 18
    frawgzfrawgz Posts: 547member
    No freakin' kidding..



    I've had it for about a minute now. So far looks not bad. Wow, am I impressed? The interface is nonstandard, but polished. It's generally not the piece of crap its Classic predecessors were. And where's all the intrusive ish? Has Real reformed its ways??



    Edit: The interface is still a bit awkward unfortunately. The traffic light buttons only activate one at a time. Maybe something they'll get fixed by final. Zooming rectangles abound.



    [ 07-17-2002: Message edited by: frawgz ]</p>
  • Reply 5 of 18
    cdong4cdong4 Posts: 194member
    bout f'in time...
  • Reply 6 of 18
    skullmacskullmac Posts: 71member
    Woah!



    Live window resizing... on custom shaped and skinned windows while video is playing. Take that QuickTime player!
  • Reply 7 of 18
    bophasabophasa Posts: 36member
    Incredible! Nicely done Real.

    Everything on C|Net plays perfectly.
  • Reply 8 of 18
    cdong4cdong4 Posts: 194member
    it works really well, worth the wait
  • Reply 9 of 18
    jahyjahy Posts: 54member
    I'd like to start off saying that before 5 minutes ago I hated Real even worse than windows media player (because it sucks ass!)



    But now, though I hesitate to say it. The Realplayer beta is good. Actually good! I can't believe it. I am astounded. Excuse me. I have to go watch all my .rm anime that I have been ignoring since I stopped using OS 9 (When was that??? Sometime in 2000?)



    Flame of Recca tonight :-)



    Funny that I just bought Recca DVDs. Maybe I'll watch Record of the Lodoss Wars... never seen that before.



    This realplayer seems to be good software. <img src="graemlins/surprised.gif" border="0" alt="[Surprised]" />
  • Reply 10 of 18
    its not brilliant, but its pretty damn solid and it works.... thats enough to make me happy... i generally don't use real for anything, but i like at least the option having it so i can check out exposure.scifi.com and otherstuff....



    after going without for 6 months, its certainly a pleasant surprise....



    btw, props for the apollo440 shoutout.....



    // michael
  • Reply 11 of 18
    macasaurusmacasaurus Posts: 243member
    I WISH REAL WERE JUST A LITTLE FASTER! Anyway, this is a pretty nice product. Like it because now I can see all the real player stuff I wasn't able to before!
  • Reply 12 of 18
    andersanders Posts: 6,523member
    What Surfrat and CDonG4 said.



    Hope it is as good as some say.
  • Reply 13 of 18
    mithrasmithras Posts: 165member
    The best part is that they haven't had time to port all the crapware ads, promotional messages, and rings of blinking, obnoxious buttons. Hopefully it'll stay slim and trim as it is now, rather than "improve" with all the junk!



    Incidentally, is it just me, or is this "RealOne" player pretty much just RealPlayer, and not at all RealJukebox?
  • Reply 14 of 18
    emaneman Posts: 7,204member
    Finally!
  • Reply 15 of 18
    patchoulipatchouli Posts: 402member
    It looks and acts exactly like RealOne for the PC (thank god Real calmed down the Ads dramatically with both versions). Real is still not my #1 choice for streaming, but it looks like we have no choice (for the Mac if the site does not offer QT) until Microsoft makes WMP better integrated with IE.



    On my PC running WindowsXP, both QT and Real are choppy and slower compared to the speed, clarity and seamless integration of WMP (just like QT runs best on a Mac). Real likes to take over whenever it loads (and they talk about MS), and QT has really always been a bit buggy and slower to load on the PC.



    There is an article in PC Magazine that shows image examples of WMP, QT, and Real technologies - and surprisingly enough Real was the clearest (though, I think PCMag suggests that WMP was best) with WMP right behind it and QT being the least clear (using MPEG4). Bizarre I know, but the truth is, they've all come a long way.



    <a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,4149,704,00.asp"; target="_blank">http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,4149,704,00.asp</a>;



    [ 07-17-2002: Message edited by: Patchouli ]</p>
  • Reply 16 of 18
    andersanders Posts: 6,523member
    Its Tony Tiger Grrrrrrrreat. Fast and doesn´t behave like it really doesn´t want to be on my screen (like realplayer for 9). Love the simple interface but hate the WMP look.
  • Reply 17 of 18
    cobracobra Posts: 253member
    Pretty nice!



    Take a lesson here Microsoft. Your player for OS X bites the big one.
  • Reply 18 of 18
    telomartelomar Posts: 1,804member
    It a great imporvement over the old version...what I really want to know though is why this was put in the MWNY forum when it doesn't even bear mention to it and not in the software thread like the other moderator had



    Damn Administrators think they run the place and can do whatever they want
Sign In or Register to comment.