What will iLife '07 be like?

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in Mac Software edited January 2014
What do you think? Apple always seems to evolve a great deal each time it releases one of its yearly iLife suites... what do you think will be added this year? You don't have to post about the whole suite, or limit yourself to one app/feature either. Write as little or as much as you want, and make your prediction.



Personally (and randomly), I'd like to see a feature in iPhoto where you can easily tag your photos (kinda like memory miner or facebook). It'd be great to be able to just search for a name or something. There is a system for adding text info to your photos in place now, but it's inconvenient; Apple can make it better.



Ideas anyone?
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 34
    galleygalley Posts: 971member
    From what I have read, Pages will have two environments, word processing and desktop publishing. There will also be a new spreadsheet app, but it won't do all the hardcore number crunching that Excel does. That would be fine with me as all I use Excel for is creating forms.



    [Edit] Dopey me! flinch13 asked about iLife, not iWork.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 34
    iqatedoiqatedo Posts: 1,846member
    flinch13 was asking about iLife, not iWork. What you said about pages was interesting though.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 34
    chuckerchucker Posts: 5,089member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by flinch13


    Personally (and randomly), I'd like to see a feature in iPhoto where you can easily tag your photos (kinda like memory miner or facebook). It'd be great to be able to just search for a name or something. There is a system for adding text info to your photos in place now, but it's inconvenient; Apple can make it better.



    Tried Keyword Assistant?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 34
    eckingecking Posts: 1,588member
    I'd like to see iphoto get free form drawing capabilities and become like an iphoto+ms paint mix. I'd to be able to really resize images in photo instead of just cropping.



    I'd like imovie to have photobooth effects become new filters for it so I could deform movies Ive shot and stuff.



    I'd like to be able to view and edit and add html to iweb if I want.



    That's all I can think of right now.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 34
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Chucker


    Tried Keyword Assistant?



    Hmm... this is interesting.. thanks!



    And btw. thanks for your opinions, guys. Keep 'em coming!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 34
    brussellbrussell Posts: 9,812member
    We'll be sure to see the blue-screen features of Leopard's iChat in iMovie.



    I sure as hell hope there are some improvement to iWeb.



    I've got a wild guess, too: Some type of animation application. Kind of an iMovie but to make your own Pixar movies.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 34
    irelandireland Posts: 17,802member
    I would like to see iLife become part of Leopard, and iWork too.



    There's too many diffirent bundles of software that tie together well, there's no need to seperate them. Steve said at this years WWDC that Leopard would be the "complete package", and IMO Leopard wouldn't be "complete" without iWork and iLife bundled in. Frankly I don't care if we have to wait until March or April, but I strongly believe Mac OS X.5 Leopard should be sold for $129 with iLife '07 and iWork '07 built-in. I know a few people who have Tiger, but still have iLife '05, and very few have iWork. If they truly want to show of the true potential to all non-Mac users, and allow Mac users to unlock their Mac's true potential, they must do this. It makes too much sense to be wrong IMO.



    I also believe that if they do this, they should stop selling iLife and iWork as separate products. They should be part of the OS. They should keep .Mac separate though, but they should lower the damn price. All these things would have a HUGE impact of the Mac IMO, and would faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarr outweigh the miniscule losses they would occur for a brief period while this thing kicks in. If .Mac was $29, Leopard was $129, and iLife and iWork were bundled with the OS, there would be a huge amount of people in the same situation, a very good situation, and I would bet my life that this would lead to an exponential halo effect. I hope to God that Apple sees what I see, cause it's very clear to me.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 34
    pt123pt123 Posts: 696member
    Support IPTC. Allow me to easily add photos to a film roll. Stop creating duplicates of my photos in the modified folder.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 34
    addaboxaddabox Posts: 12,665member
    Although not a perfect match, some of the ideas here-- blue screen, PhotoBooth type deformation effects for iMovie, animation- suggest to me the opportunity for a consumer version of Motion (or Shake, I guess, but I don't see how you get any of that into a consumer app).



    Look at the FPC suite-- all the pro apps have iLife analogues except Motion (FPC/iMove, DVDSP/iDVD, Soundtrack/Garage Band).



    Motion graphics are probably a harder sell in the consumer space, people aren't used to mucking about with video beyond editing and basic effects, but then they weren't used to mucking about with video or multi-track recording before iMovie and Garage Band.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 10 of 34
    Quote:

    Support IPTC. Allow me to easily add photos to a film roll. Stop creating duplicates of my photos in the modified folder.



    I know, right? that is THE most annoying part of iPhoto



    Quote:

    There's too many diffirent bundles of software that tie together well, there's no need to seperate them. Steve said at this years WWDC that Leopard would be the "complete package", and IMO Leopard wouldn't be "complete" without iWork and iLife bundled in. Frankly I don't care if we have to wait until March or April, but I strongly believe Mac OS X.5 Leopard should be sold for $129 with iLife '07 and iWork '07 built-in. I know a few people who have Tiger, but still have iLife '05, and very few have iWork. If they truly want to show of the true potential to all non-Mac users, and allow Mac users to unlock their Mac's true potential, they must do this. It makes too much sense to be wrong IMO.



    I also believe that if they do this, they should stop selling iLife and iWork as separate products. They should be part of the OS. They should keep .Mac separate though, but they should lower the damn price. All these things would have a HUGE impact of the Mac IMO, and would faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarr outweigh the miniscule losses they would occur for a brief period while this thing kicks in. If .Mac was $29, Leopard was $129, and iLife and iWork were bundled with the OS, there would be a huge amount of people in the same situation, a very good situation, and I would bet my life that this would lead to an exponential halo effect. I hope to God that Apple sees what I see, cause it's very clear to me.



    well, it sounds like a good idea, but they should also sell it separately because what if a new iLife comes out before a new OS comes out? just a free update? Apple would loose a lot of money that way IMO. also, i know quite a few people still using panther and maybe wont upgrade to leopard. so what then, are they stuck with iLife 06? maybe bundled with the OS and separately sold would work, but i still think it would be a loss of income. at least it comes free with the new computers though
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 11 of 34
    feynmanfeynman Posts: 1,087member
    I remember when everything in iLife was free except iDVD which only came with Mac's with DVD-R drives!



    If you ask me the suite is getting a little complicated but then again I haven't really used it enough lately.



    It would be nice if iPhoto had some kind of text tool to write on the photos. Built in support for watermarking should seem obvious. Beyond that, I would think they would add CoreImage effects to iMovie. CoreAnimation effects would be cool in some new Shake line consumer oriented program but that would not be coming until at least iLife 08 (just kidding!).
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 12 of 34
    iPhoto
    • tighter integration with Aperture.

    iMovie
    • Improvements to exporting video (i.e. YouTube, Google, iTunes, etc)

    • ability to add ID3 information to video

    iWeb
    • publish directly to a non .mac web site.

    • add non-iWeb pages to navigation menu

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 13 of 34
    Ireland: Word. I'm not made of money. I feel like Apple would make more money selling "the complete package", as more people would be interested in buying it. You've got to appeal to the bulk of the people, and most people aren't really going to be freakishly prompt about updating their software. When their computer doesn't do what they want, they get a new one. If Leopard comes with everything, more people will want it. Besides, software isn't like hardware... granted, there are developers working hard on it, and they deserve to get paid, but seriously now... software isn't real. There are no manufacturing costs or raw materials besides a disc or two, and shipping isn't really that big of a deal. It could even be completely free, given an internet connection that could handle it and the creation of a bootable disk of some kind. But what can I say. Who knows what will come. Freaks like me will buy it anyway, even if the price stays sky high.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 14 of 34
    irelandireland Posts: 17,802member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by sthiede


    Also, i know quite a few people still using panther and maybe wont upgrade to leopard.



    Well if what I suggested happens, and the guys/gals you know that are using Panter want iLife '07, then they will know what to do wont they! Steve might say, "now you've no reason to be stuck on Panter, for $129 you'll be propelled into the modern age, with all the accesories to handle it".



    edit: I saw an awful spelling mistake.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 15 of 34
    There are only 2 things iLife doesn't have that I really want. The first is the ability to add different layers of elements to put on top of video in iMovie. I'd like very much to be able to put pieces of video, images, and maybe some animation on top of videos, but sadly I'm limited to text and some effects.



    Second, I wish iWeb could publish to other sites, specifically Geocities. It's a pain in the neck to export my site, upload with Cyberduck, only to find something went wrong and having to enjoy the process all over again. It would also be SWEET if iWeb were able to be tied into eBay. I use iWeb for my high price listings to add some pizzaz but the aforementioned process of creating in iWeb and uploading to Geocities sucks and is time consuming. But, I suppose the main idea behind iWeb is to get you to buy .Mac.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 16 of 34
    iWeb - needs to have better custom page layouts. this NEEDS to happen. i would much prefer to use iWeb than frontpage to present some of my coursework on. it just looks more clean and professional, thanks to apple, and presentation counts.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 17 of 34
    iPhotos



    -Easier way to change dates on pictures that may of been wrong on the camera.

    -Easier way to add information to pictures like, grandparents, sister, cousin and things like that.



    iMovie



    -Needs easier navigation.

    -Clearer words for the screen, I have been using iMovie for over a year now and I must be doing something wrong or there is something wrong with iMovie. Adding text to the movie look blurry all the time. Any suggestions or does everyone else have the same problem.



    iWeb



    -Apple already has pre-made web pages. I would like them to add all the graphics and picture gallery to iWeb so that we can make on out of scratch. Allow us to mix and match the different pre-made web pages.

    -I would also like to see iWeb allow for voting on the web site. I have a family website and I could put up trivia questions for the family members.



    I agree with bundling iLife and iWorks. That would beat MS because they have so many application to choose from that are expensive and are never pre-loaded into the computer. Apple could take a lead in this. .Mac could come down in price that would be so cool. iChat is awsome but you have to have a .Mac account and it is not that affordable. I have an account but I would like some of my family to get it but it is too costly.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 18 of 34
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by machappy


    iChat is awsome but you have to have a .Mac account



    not true, ive had my trial account for 6 months now



    so much for 60 days....
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 19 of 34
    kickahakickaha Posts: 8,760member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by machappy


    iChat is awsome but you have to have a .Mac account and it is not that affordable. I have an account but I would like some of my family to get it but it is too costly.



    You do not. iChat works with a free AOL AIM account, or any number of free Jabber servers.



    Also, go sign up for a free .Mac trial account, and you get to *keep* your .Mac ID for use with iChat even if you don't sign up at the end of the trial period.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 20 of 34
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Kickaha


    You do not. iChat works with a free AOL AIM account, or any number of free Jabber servers.



    Also, go sign up for a free .Mac trial account, and you get to *keep* your .Mac ID for use with iChat even if you don't sign up at the end of the trial period.





    Thanks guys I didn't know that. Thanks Again.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.