Toggle navigation
All Forums
Recent Posts
Sign In
Post your Xbench results.
«
1
2
»
Comments
Reply 21 of 25
the pie man
Posts:
425
member
January 18, 2003 10:50PM
I believe I am winning so far:
Results\t15.20\t
\tSystem Info\t\t
\t\tXbench Version\t\t1.0b6
\t\tSystem Version\t\t10.2.3
\t\tPhysical RAM\t\t320 MB
\t\tProcessor\t\tPowerPC 750 [267 MHz]
\t\t\tL1 Cache\t\t32K (instruction), 32K (data)
\t\t\tL2 Cache\t\t1024K
\t\t\tBus Frequency\t\t67 MHz
\t
CPU Test\t28.88
Thread Test\t20.29\t
Memory Test\t18.70
Quartz Graphics Test\t23.93
OpenGL Graphics Test\t5.79
User Interface Test\t26.51
Disk Test\t14.11
Dig that crazy OpenGL Graphics Test :eek:
Reply 22 of 25
the pie man
Posts:
425
member
January 18, 2003 11:12PM
Ok - why in the world are all the memory scores for the iBook so horrible? Check out the xBench database <a href="
http://ladd.dyndns.org/xbench/csi.xhtml?machineTypeID=17"
; target="_blank">here</a>.
What is going on? This machine has a 100MHz bus, but scores about 1/4 my Dual 500 - which also has a 100MHz bus.
Ideas?
Reply 23 of 25
1337_5l4xx0r
Posts:
1,558
member
January 18, 2003 11:26PM
Powerbook G4 867mhz, 768 MB RAM, Radeon 9000 mobility:
Results\t77.18\t
\tSystem Info\t\t
\t\tXbench Version\t\t1.0b6
\t\tSystem Version\t\t10.2.3
\t\tPhysical RAM\t\t768 MB
\t\tProcessor\t\tPowerPC G4 [867 MHz]
\t\t\t
CPU Test: 95.47
Thread Test: 56.44
Memory: 98.10
Quartz: 108.01
OpenGL: 82.52
UI: 90.58
Disk: 50.28
[ 01-19-2003: Message edited by: 1337_5L4Xx0R ]</p>
Reply 24 of 25
torifile
Posts:
4,024
member
January 31, 2003 12:55AM
Here are mine on the new mini pb. Something not right with people's scores, though. A 15" 700 mhz beating an 800 mhz g4? 175 FPS on SPJ's powerbook? Anyway:
[code]
Results\t70.26\t
\tSystem Info\t\t
\t\tXbench Version\t\t1.0
\t\tSystem Version\t\t10.2.3
\t\tPhysical RAM\t\t640 MB
\t\tModel\t\tPowerBook6,1
\t\tProcessor\t\tPowerPC G4 @ 867 MHz
\t\t\tVersion\t\t7455 (Apollo) v3.3
\t\t\tL1 Cache\t\t32K (instruction), 32K (data)
\t\t\tL2 Cache\t\t256K @ 534 MHz
\t\t\tBus Frequency\t\t134 MHz
\t\tVideo Card\t\tGeForce4 MX
\t\tDrive Type\t\tFUJITSU MHS2040AT D
\tCPU Test\t82.88\t
\t\tGCD Recursion\t85.57\t3.34 Mops/sec
\t\tFloating Point Basic\t90.71\t305.75 Mflop/sec
\t\tAltiVec Basic\t67.55\t3.66 Gflop/sec
\t\tFloating Point Library\t93.06\t4.18 Mops/sec
\tThread Test\t55.28\t
\t\tComputation\t53.70\t432.59 Kops/sec, 4 threads
\t\tLock Contention\t56.95\t714.94 Klocks/sec, 4 threads
\tMemory Test\t88.33\t
\t\tSystem\t75.01\t
\t\t\tAllocate\t102.70\t34.63 Kalloc/sec
\t\t\tFill\t69.17\t396.66 MB/sec
\t\t\tCopy\t63.29\t316.45 MB/sec
\t\tStream\t107.39\t
\t\t\tCopy\t109.67\t479.59 MB/sec [altivec]
\t\t\tScale\t111.76\t487.63 MB/sec [altivec]
\t\t\tAdd\t108.12\t491.95 MB/sec [altivec]
\t\t\tTriad\t100.67\t442.34 MB/sec [altivec]
\tQuartz Graphics Test\t77.00\t
\t\tLine\t71.80\t1.83 Klines/sec [50% alpha]
\t\tRectangle\t81.79\t5.75 Krects/sec [50% alpha]
\t\tCircle\t86.01\t1.98 Kcircles/sec [50% alpha]
\t\tBezier\t81.33\t883.72 beziers/sec [50% alpha]
\t\tText\t67.28\t1.10 Kchars/sec
\tOpenGL Graphics Test\t93.86\t
\t\tSpinning Squares\t93.86\t65.68 frames/sec
\tUser Interface Test\t65.05\t
\t\tElements\t65.05\t22.13 refresh/sec
\tDisk Test\t52.25\t
\t\tSequential\t50.22\t
\t\t\tUncached Write\t43.04\t18.78 MB/sec [4K blocks]
\t\t\tUncached Write\t42.99\t17.49 MB/sec [256K blocks]
\t\t\tUncached Read\t106.19\t16.73 MB/sec [4K blocks]
\t\t\tUncached Read\t42.13\t18.18 MB/sec [256K blocks]
\t\tRandom\t54.44\t
\t\t\tUncached Write\t66.79\t1.01 MB/sec [4K blocks]
\t\t\tUncached Write\t45.24\t10.38 MB/sec [256K blocks]
\t\t\tUncached Read\t56.57\t0.37 MB/sec [4K blocks]
\t\t\tUncached Read\t53.42\t10.47 MB/sec [256K blocks]
</pre><hr></blockquote>
[ 01-31-2003: Message edited by: torifile ]</p>
Reply 25 of 25
mount_my_floppy
Posts:
913
member
January 31, 2003 1:25AM
G4 Dual 533 GeForce2MX(Hurray for me...) 1.5Gig of ram.
Results: 59.48
CPU Test: 55.66
Thread Test: 78.70
Memory Test: 96.44
Quartz Graphics: 82.04
OpenGL Graphics: 84.03
UI Test: 77.45
Disk test: 25.23
Disk test2: 90.04
I ran 2 disk tests because I have 2 Hard Drives. You can see one of them sucks badly.
«
1
2
»
Sign In
or
Register
to comment.
Comments
Results\t15.20\t
\tSystem Info\t\t
\t\tXbench Version\t\t1.0b6
\t\tSystem Version\t\t10.2.3
\t\tPhysical RAM\t\t320 MB
\t\tProcessor\t\tPowerPC 750 [267 MHz]
\t\t\tL1 Cache\t\t32K (instruction), 32K (data)
\t\t\tL2 Cache\t\t1024K
\t\t\tBus Frequency\t\t67 MHz
\t
CPU Test\t28.88
Thread Test\t20.29\t
Memory Test\t18.70
Quartz Graphics Test\t23.93
OpenGL Graphics Test\t5.79
User Interface Test\t26.51
Disk Test\t14.11
Dig that crazy OpenGL Graphics Test :eek:
What is going on? This machine has a 100MHz bus, but scores about 1/4 my Dual 500 - which also has a 100MHz bus.
Ideas?
Results\t77.18\t
\tSystem Info\t\t
\t\tXbench Version\t\t1.0b6
\t\tSystem Version\t\t10.2.3
\t\tPhysical RAM\t\t768 MB
\t\tProcessor\t\tPowerPC G4 [867 MHz]
\t\t\t
CPU Test: 95.47
Thread Test: 56.44
Memory: 98.10
Quartz: 108.01
OpenGL: 82.52
UI: 90.58
Disk: 50.28
[ 01-19-2003: Message edited by: 1337_5L4Xx0R ]</p>
[code]
Results\t70.26\t
\tSystem Info\t\t
\t\tXbench Version\t\t1.0
\t\tSystem Version\t\t10.2.3
\t\tPhysical RAM\t\t640 MB
\t\tModel\t\tPowerBook6,1
\t\tProcessor\t\tPowerPC G4 @ 867 MHz
\t\t\tVersion\t\t7455 (Apollo) v3.3
\t\t\tL1 Cache\t\t32K (instruction), 32K (data)
\t\t\tL2 Cache\t\t256K @ 534 MHz
\t\t\tBus Frequency\t\t134 MHz
\t\tVideo Card\t\tGeForce4 MX
\t\tDrive Type\t\tFUJITSU MHS2040AT D
\tCPU Test\t82.88\t
\t\tGCD Recursion\t85.57\t3.34 Mops/sec
\t\tFloating Point Basic\t90.71\t305.75 Mflop/sec
\t\tAltiVec Basic\t67.55\t3.66 Gflop/sec
\t\tFloating Point Library\t93.06\t4.18 Mops/sec
\tThread Test\t55.28\t
\t\tComputation\t53.70\t432.59 Kops/sec, 4 threads
\t\tLock Contention\t56.95\t714.94 Klocks/sec, 4 threads
\tMemory Test\t88.33\t
\t\tSystem\t75.01\t
\t\t\tAllocate\t102.70\t34.63 Kalloc/sec
\t\t\tFill\t69.17\t396.66 MB/sec
\t\t\tCopy\t63.29\t316.45 MB/sec
\t\tStream\t107.39\t
\t\t\tCopy\t109.67\t479.59 MB/sec [altivec]
\t\t\tScale\t111.76\t487.63 MB/sec [altivec]
\t\t\tAdd\t108.12\t491.95 MB/sec [altivec]
\t\t\tTriad\t100.67\t442.34 MB/sec [altivec]
\tQuartz Graphics Test\t77.00\t
\t\tLine\t71.80\t1.83 Klines/sec [50% alpha]
\t\tRectangle\t81.79\t5.75 Krects/sec [50% alpha]
\t\tCircle\t86.01\t1.98 Kcircles/sec [50% alpha]
\t\tBezier\t81.33\t883.72 beziers/sec [50% alpha]
\t\tText\t67.28\t1.10 Kchars/sec
\tOpenGL Graphics Test\t93.86\t
\t\tSpinning Squares\t93.86\t65.68 frames/sec
\tUser Interface Test\t65.05\t
\t\tElements\t65.05\t22.13 refresh/sec
\tDisk Test\t52.25\t
\t\tSequential\t50.22\t
\t\t\tUncached Write\t43.04\t18.78 MB/sec [4K blocks]
\t\t\tUncached Write\t42.99\t17.49 MB/sec [256K blocks]
\t\t\tUncached Read\t106.19\t16.73 MB/sec [4K blocks]
\t\t\tUncached Read\t42.13\t18.18 MB/sec [256K blocks]
\t\tRandom\t54.44\t
\t\t\tUncached Write\t66.79\t1.01 MB/sec [4K blocks]
\t\t\tUncached Write\t45.24\t10.38 MB/sec [256K blocks]
\t\t\tUncached Read\t56.57\t0.37 MB/sec [4K blocks]
\t\t\tUncached Read\t53.42\t10.47 MB/sec [256K blocks]
</pre><hr></blockquote>
[ 01-31-2003: Message edited by: torifile ]</p>
Results: 59.48
CPU Test: 55.66
Thread Test: 78.70
Memory Test: 96.44
Quartz Graphics: 82.04
OpenGL Graphics: 84.03
UI Test: 77.45
Disk test: 25.23
Disk test2: 90.04
I ran 2 disk tests because I have 2 Hard Drives. You can see one of them sucks badly.