Ok, surprising, but I can see that he's labels "other analysts" as chumps. All of them.
This guy's aggressive and very confident, at least about AAPL. Way back, I believe he was also the first analyst to predict, and of course, raise AAPL target to $100+.
This guy's aggressive and very confident, at least about AAPL. Way back, I believe he was also the first analyst to predict, and of course, raise AAPL target to $100+.
I've been following him from the early 2000's.
While his numbers have usually seemed to be a bit far out, they've always come to pass, sometimes more quickly than he predicted.
(One giveway: Munster is responsible at PJ for the coverage of Google and Yahoo, along with other very significant companies, such as ADSK and ADBE, on top of AAPL. But see his claim on this website!)
Comments
Ok, surprising, but I can see that he's labels "other analysts" as chumps. All of them.
This guy's aggressive and very confident, at least about AAPL. Way back, I believe he was also the first analyst to predict, and of course, raise AAPL target to $100+.
This guy's aggressive and very confident, at least about AAPL. Way back, I believe he was also the first analyst to predict, and of course, raise AAPL target to $100+.
I've been following him from the early 2000's.
While his numbers have usually seemed to be a bit far out, they've always come to pass, sometimes more quickly than he predicted.
While his numbers have usually seemed to be a bit far out, they've always come to pass, sometimes more quickly than he predicted.
Hope that happens again now with his $211 target on AAPL.
Chump
Bull.
Chump
This is surely a bogus site? A la fakestevejobs?
(One giveway: Munster is responsible at PJ for the coverage of Google and Yahoo, along with other very significant companies, such as ADSK and ADBE, on top of AAPL. But see his claim on this website!)
There was something on the site that said "Fake Gene".
Of course.... but I was looking for additional evidence to rule out that it could be fake-Fake Gene!