Why is Internet Explorer so bad?

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in macOS edited January 2014
Why is it just dog slow?

Why is every single windows browser better?



Why is even mozilla faster?



I hate microsoft
«134

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 75
    emaneman Posts: 7,204member
    With the exception of Java stuff, I don't have any problems with IE 5.1.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 75
    It's not.

    Windows is better than MacOS for web browsing.

    Well, only marginally faster.



    You must have something wrong with your computer or it must just be old if you think IE is so slow... that is, unless you are comparing it to a fairly new PC running IE. IE on my Mac is just snappy.



    [ 11-25-2001: Message edited by: starfleetX ]</p>
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 75
    That's strange. I've got a g4 533 digital audio with a 1.5mbps cable modem.



    10.1.1 with sosumi.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 75
    IE5.1 is a shitty piece of software.



    Maybe i'd like it if it A. used native aqua interface elements, b. used quartz AA, C. didn't not render half of th epages on the web...
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 75
    applenutapplenut Posts: 5,768member
    [quote]Originally posted by starfleetX:

    <strong>It's not.

    Windows is better than MacOS for web browsing.

    Well, only marginally faster.



    You must have something wrong with your computer or it must just be old if you think IE is so slow... that is, unless you are comparing it to a fairly new PC running IE. IE on my Mac is just snappy.



    [ 11-25-2001: Message edited by: starfleetX ]</strong><hr></blockquote>



    oh come on... IE for the mac is crap compared to the windows version. it has a few nicer features and supposedly is more compatible but the speed and responsiveness sucks. rendering speed is horrible and it doesn't take advantage of any OS X specific features such as sheets, quartz, etc.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 75
    For the past day I have been using mozilla 0.9.6..



    The rendering speed is VERY fast. Try loading versiontracker with explorer and then try it with mozilla. wow. Also mozilla lets you change the speed of the scrollwheel which is really cool.



    The only drawback is that mozilla uses it's own themes instead of using osx's extra.rscr file.



    Then sosumi would work for mozilla too!

    Maybe sinewave should make a sosumi theme for netscape.. :cool:
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 75
    sinewavesinewave Posts: 1,074member
    [quote]Originally posted by corvette:

    <strong>That's strange. I've got a g4 533 digital audio with a 1.5mbps cable modem.



    10.1.1 with sosumi.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    I don't think sosumi would effect your web browsing speed
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 75
    sinewavesinewave Posts: 1,074member
    [quote]Originally posted by applenut:

    <strong>



    oh come on... IE for the mac is crap compared to the windows version. it has a few nicer features and supposedly is more compatible but the speed and responsiveness sucks. rendering speed is horrible and it doesn't take advantage of any OS X specific features such as sheets, quartz, etc.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Carbon apps so far can't use Quartz for text rendering. That is why Omniweb is the only browser that does so. Have you tried any of the Sneaky Peek versions of Omniweb 4.1?



    <a href="http://www.omnigroup.com/ftp/pub/outgoing/sneakypeek/"; target="_blank">http://www.omnigroup.com/ftp/pub/outgoing/sneakypeek/</a>;
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 75
    sinewavesinewave Posts: 1,074member
    [quote]Originally posted by corvette:

    <strong>For the past day I have been using mozilla 0.9.6..



    The rendering speed is VERY fast. Try loading versiontracker with explorer and then try it with mozilla. wow. Also mozilla lets you change the speed of the scrollwheel which is really cool.



    The only drawback is that mozilla uses it's own themes instead of using osx's extra.rscr file.



    Then sosumi would work for mozilla too!

    Maybe sinewave should make a sosumi theme for netscape.. :cool: </strong><hr></blockquote>



    Not sure how Netscape makes themes.. where is the documentation for this?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 10 of 75
    applenutapplenut Posts: 5,768member
    [quote]Originally posted by Sinewave:

    <strong>



    Carbon apps so far can't use Quartz for text rendering. That is why Omniweb is the only browser that does so. Have you tried any of the Sneaky Peek versions of Omniweb 4.1?



    <a href="http://www.omnigroup.com/ftp/pub/outgoing/sneakypeek/"; target="_blank">http://www.omnigroup.com/ftp/pub/outgoing/sneakypeek/</a></strong><hr></blockquote>;





    but Office uses quartz for text rendering in certain parts and is all carbon.



    have tried a few sneakypeaks. nothing special. try to like omniweb but it just annoys me too often in its shortcomings
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 11 of 75
    Office pisses me off too - in lieu of Quickdraw AA in the main workspaces, it uses _NONE_. Therefore, the change from quartz AA to none = quite drastic and ugly.



    Also, the platinum controls in web pages in IE5 = UGH
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 12 of 75
    Have you guys tried out Euntorage v.x yet?



    It looks very windowx xpish. It is going to take some time before I get used to this app. It looks very bloated but the calendar looks very nice.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 13 of 75
    sinewavesinewave Posts: 1,074member
    [quote]Originally posted by applenut:

    <strong>





    but Office uses quartz for text rendering in certain parts and is all carbon.<hr></blockquote></strong>

    In Window dialogs it can use Quartz. For text you type out it can't

    <strong> [quote]

    have tried a few sneakypeaks. nothing special. try to like omniweb but it just annoys me too often in its shortcomings</strong><hr></blockquote>

    Seems lots of things "annoy" you too much.

    Why don't you email omniweb over and over again and bitch and complain and DEMAND them to change the annoying parts just to suit you?



    [ 11-25-2001: Message edited by: Sinewave ]</p>
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 14 of 75
    applenutapplenut Posts: 5,768member
    [quote]In Window dialogs it can use Quartz. For text you type out it can't<hr></blockquote>



    and the reason behind this is? I don't understand why Excel would be able to use antialiased graphics but word would not be able to use text.



    [quote]Seems lots of things "annoy" you too much.

    Why don't you email omniweb over and over again and bitch and complain and DEMAND them to change the annoying parts just to suit you? <hr></blockquote>



    how about no. they are working on them and are open to changes and suggestions unlike some other places I know.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 15 of 75
    sinewavesinewave Posts: 1,074member
    [quote]Originally posted by applenut:

    <strong>

    and the reason behind this is? I don't understand why Excel would be able to use antialiased graphics but word would not be able to use text.

    </strong><hr></blockquote>

    It's not supported in Carbon. Carbon can't directly access Quartz yet. BUT I HAVE heard that there is a hack you COULD use through QuickDraw to do this. But it is buggy and doesn't provide consistent results.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 16 of 75
    What bout the finder, Sinewave?



    That's carbon, and it accesses Quartz. Oh, so does iTunes2 - notice that now, in the "search" field, when you input text, it's antialiased by Quartz...
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 17 of 75
    sinewavesinewave Posts: 1,074member
    [quote]Originally posted by Jonathan:

    <strong>What bout the finder, Sinewave?



    That's carbon, and it accesses Quartz. Oh, so does iTunes2 - notice that now, in the "search" field, when you input text, it's antialiased by Quartz...</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Ok.. I just asked some one that is a part of the Finder team about this.. Apple hacks quickdraw to use quartz to render text. It's a hack.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 18 of 75
    applenutapplenut Posts: 5,768member
    [quote]Originally posted by Sinewave:

    <strong>

    It's not supported in Carbon. Carbon can't directly access Quartz yet. BUT I HAVE heard that there is a hack you COULD use through QuickDraw to do this. But it is buggy and doesn't provide consistent results.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    don't mean to bug you if you don't know the answer but that just doesn't make sense.



    as shwn several apps such as iTunes and the Finder do have quartz rendering for inputed text, there is quartz rendering for graphics, etc. and isn't quartz rendering being implemented into go live and is in illustrator?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 19 of 75
    [quote]Originally posted by Sinewave:

    <strong>Ok.. I just asked some one that is a part of the Finder team about this.. Apple hacks quickdraw to use quartz to render text. It's a hack.</strong><hr></blockquote> Okay, you asked someone on the "Finder team" about this? How believable does that sound?



    For CoreGraphics, the default for Carbon apps is to retain the old-style OS9-era font smoothing. The newer AA is certainly available, but is not the default because Carbon apps were expected to be the "bridge crossing" apps that would work in both OS9 and OSX. Several new Carbon apps like the Finder, iTunes, and Snapz (many others I'm sure, but I'm not at my X machine now) have been written to properly take advantage of AA. IE and Office v.X are just examples of shoddy, poorly-coded ports.



    [ 11-25-2001: Message edited by: starfleetX ]</p>
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 20 of 75
    Not necessarily shoddy... just not all the way to where they should be.



    Maybe someday...
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.