10.2 will cost $, what do you expect...

2

Comments

  • Reply 21 of 43
    kecksykecksy Posts: 1,002member
    [quote]Originally posted by Zarathustra:

    <strong>Will the update mean that my printer's functions return or my scanner works? If we have to pay (again) shouldn't we get an OS that does what we always could as a minimum? If the new version is complete 'Classic' should be redundant.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Jaguar is looking like it will offer everything OS 9 did and a bunch more. 10.1 brought speed and usability, but 10.2 will bring greater speed and feature completeness. Wonder if they'll bother releasing 10.3 after this or go straight to 11?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 22 of 43
    eugeneeugene Posts: 8,254member
    When's the last time Apple offered a discounted "Upgrade" package for any Mac OS? I have never seen that. Apple won't do it. Either it'll be free with $20 shipping and handling or $99. I think it's unlikely that the full version of Mac OS X will stay at $129.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 23 of 43
    applenutapplenut Posts: 5,768member
    [quote]Originally posted by sickmiller:

    <strong>



    do we know that it will be called 10.2? it seems like if this is as major as everyone says, they might make it a 10.5. jmtc</strong><hr></blockquote>



    I don't think Apple is in any hurry to jump version numbers like that and get closer to 11.



    I mean when they get to 11 what are they going to do. Mac OS X 11.0 or Mac OS XI?





    doesn't sound too good either way
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 24 of 43
    eugeneeugene Posts: 8,254member
    You will probably see major updates not referred to by version number and referred to by code-name from now on. OS X Jaguar might officially be called Jaguar. Windows is the same. Windows XP is just Windows '5.5' or something like that.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 25 of 43
    groveratgroverat Posts: 10,872member
    MacOSX: Jaguar as the official name would be farking sweer.



    I might buy the upgrade from the UT computer store just to have a CD that says MacOSX: Jaguar on it.



    Win2k is Windows NT 5

    WinXP is Windows NT 5.5
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 26 of 43
    hobbeshobbes Posts: 1,252member
    [quote]Originally posted by groverat:

    I might buy the upgrade from the UT computer store just to have a CD that says MacOSX: Jaguar on it. <hr></blockquote>





    That would be neat...



    What's next though...? A whole series of cat code names?





    2002 Mac OS X: Jaguar

    2003 Mac OS X: Ocelot

    2004 Mac OS X: Giant Mountain Lion

    etc.



    How do you get across a sense of improvement, n' advancing technology, like a number series does?



    And how does a non-Mac/feline/linguistic expert keep the OS names in order?



    "Um, so which is better, OS X v.'Big Kitty' or 'OS X v. Sabre-Toothed Tiger'?"



    [ 06-21-2002: Message edited by: Hobbes ]</p>
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 27 of 43
    I hope it'll be a free upgrade, but I plan to get it either way. I hope it's no more than $100 or so.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 28 of 43
    Mac OS X: Bobcat for handhelds?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 29 of 43
    patchoulipatchouli Posts: 402member
    [quote]Originally posted by groverat:



    Win2k is Windows NT 5

    WinXP is Windows NT 5.5<hr></blockquote>Actually, WindowsXP is version 5.1 (or 5.1.2600 to be exact).



    I think Apple should release an update to 10.1.5 (we'll call that 10.1.6) to fix the issues that 10.1.5 brought on. Then, they can charge $99 for the 10.2 upgrade.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 30 of 43
    [quote]Originally posted by Eugene:

    <strong>When's the last time Apple offered a discounted "Upgrade" package for any Mac OS? I have never seen that. Apple won't do it. Either it'll be free with $20 shipping and handling or $99. I think it's unlikely that the full version of Mac OS X will stay at $129.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Oooh... an easy one! OS 10.0 -&gt; 10.1



    All you had to do was saunter down to CompUSA and say "Give the the OS X upgrade." It was free. I have NEVER paid for OS X. And I have used every version since DP4.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 31 of 43
    jdradenjdraden Posts: 89member
    Actually, isn't XP Windows NT 5.1? I think it is.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 32 of 43
    nebagakidnebagakid Posts: 2,692member
    **** XP
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 33 of 43
    majormattmajormatt Posts: 1,077member
    [quote]It should at least have what 10.0 should have had. But that would be asking too much right? <hr></blockquote>



    So when will Apple not owe you anything in terms of an operating system?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 34 of 43
    kecksykecksy Posts: 1,002member
    [quote]Originally posted by Hobbes:

    <strong>





    That would be neat...



    What's next though...? A whole series of cat code names?





    2002 Mac OS X: Jaguar

    2003 Mac OS X: Ocelot

    2004 Mac OS X: Giant Mountain Lion

    etc.



    How do you get across a sense of improvement, n' advancing technology, like a number series does?



    And how does a non-Mac/feline/linguistic expert keep the OS names in order?



    "Um, so which is better, OS X v.'Big Kitty' or 'OS X v. Sabre-Toothed Tiger'?"



    [ 06-21-2002: Message edited by: Hobbes ]</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Actually, all the versions of OS X have had a feline codename.



    10.0 was referred to internally as Cheetah (kind of an oxymoron if you ask me)



    10.1 was Puma (Basically a Giant Mountain Lion ) and 10.2 is Jaguar



    Be funny if they named 10.3 Pussy Cat.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 35 of 43
    eugeneeugene Posts: 8,254member
    [quote]Originally posted by Ringwraith:

    <strong>



    Oooh... an easy one! OS 10.0 -&gt; 10.1



    All you had to do was saunter down to CompUSA and say "Give the the OS X upgrade." It was free. I have NEVER paid for OS X. And I have used every version since DP4.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    That's what I meant. Either the updates are free or regular price. There are no discounts for updates. The only discounts I've seen are for special conditions, like people who paid $30 for Public Beta...they got a $30 credit toward a purchase of the final release.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 36 of 43
    existenzexistenz Posts: 57member
    it will cost just as much as the 9.1.x &gt; 9.2 update.



    99$ for the full OS (non-upgrade)
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 37 of 43
    hobbeshobbes Posts: 1,252member
    [quote]Originally posted by Keeksy:

    <strong>



    Actually, all the versions of OS X have had a feline codename.



    10.0 was referred to internally as Cheetah (kind of an oxymoron if you ask me)



    10.1 was Puma (Basically a Giant Mountain Lion ) and 10.2 is Jaguar



    Be funny if they named 10.3 Pussy Cat. </strong><hr></blockquote>





    Yes. I know. What was suggested was using the internal code name as the shipping product name.



    I was demonstrating how silly this idea is... Don't get me wrong, internal (even sem-public, a la Jaguar) code names are neat.



    But shipping products need more user-friendly, serious names.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 38 of 43
    The critter on the cover thing seems to work for O'Reilly
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 39 of 43
    eugeneeugene Posts: 8,254member
    [quote]Originally posted by eXistenZ:

    <strong>it will cost just as much as the 9.1.x &gt; 9.2 update.



    99$ for the full OS (non-upgrade)</strong><hr></blockquote>



    You're assuming Jaguar will indeed be 10.2. Internally, that's what Jaguar is at the moment, but it could very well be 10.5 when it's released in a couple of months.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 40 of 43
    phobosphobos Posts: 29member
    It would be safe for apple to give the upgrade either for $50 or for free. I for once would be very pissed if I had to pay for something that was supposed to be complete in the first place and it wasn't.In september I'm gonna buy a powerbook (a newer version of the DVI model I hope !!!!) so I'm gonna have it on the whole package. But if I wasn't going to buy a new machine I would prefer to download a full of bugs carracho version than pay apple the money.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.