Well, it's more like 1 million times as they forgot that pico is between micro and femto.
It'd be 1 billion times, because there's a nano in there, too. But the whole idea that people would take these metric prefixes as that descriptive of the product is a bit weird.
interesting idea... spend money for expensive AT&T service, then buy additional expensive box and be charged for airtime for using your own broadband connection because their cellular service doesn't work.
I have an idea. The box should REVERSE the charges. AT&T pays you $0.40 per minute when you have to use it because they don't have coverage.
AT&T must suck balls if they can't have a signal everywhere in the USA, which doesn't have many mountains or skyscrapers that block signals, like Japan does...
You have got to be kidding... Or apparently never took a look at a topographical map of the western USA in particular...
Comments
Well, it's more like 1 million times as they forgot that pico is between micro and femto.
It'd be 1 billion times, because there's a nano in there, too. But the whole idea that people would take these metric prefixes as that descriptive of the product is a bit weird.
I have an idea. The box should REVERSE the charges. AT&T pays you $0.40 per minute when you have to use it because they don't have coverage.
AT&T must suck balls if they can't have a signal everywhere in the USA, which doesn't have many mountains or skyscrapers that block signals, like Japan does...
You have got to be kidding... Or apparently never took a look at a topographical map of the western USA in particular...
You have got to be kidding... Or apparently never took a look at a topographical map of the western USA in particular...
Or even the East.
if AT&T plans to use others' network to be able to access AT&T services, why do they disallow skype over their own 3G?
Excellent question!
Hard to picture this happening without ISP backlash.