why was it unfair? what are they supposed to do? write their own OS X native copy of the software titles? it's not their fault they only had OS 9 titles available.
and MP is not all that bad in OS 9 especially in FCP, PS, and several other pro apps that use it.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Why was it unfair, you ask? Because people buy Macs to edit video. They don't buy them to run Premiere 6.0 or any other specific version of a specific app. They buy Macs to get a job done and the tool to do it is largely inconsequential unless it has a horrid and hindering interface or prohibitively expensive.
Let's see them throw some OS X, FCP 3 numbers (especially with the real-time effects) into the mix and see what happens.
Why was it unfair, you ask? Because people buy Macs to edit video. They don't buy them to run Premiere 6.0 or any other specific version of a specific app. They buy Macs to get a job done and the tool to do it is largely inconsequential unless it has a horrid and hindering interface or prohibitively expensive.
Let's see them throw some OS X, FCP 3 numbers (especially with the real-time effects) into the mix and see what happens.</strong><hr></blockquote>
and performance is not something they look for?
quit the mac blindness. it's just dumb. the mac got its ass kicked. accept it
<strong>I think it'd be very interesting to see these tests redone after we get the new PM's and/or when all these apps are available for OS X.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Comments
<strong>
why was it unfair? what are they supposed to do? write their own OS X native copy of the software titles? it's not their fault they only had OS 9 titles available.
and MP is not all that bad in OS 9 especially in FCP, PS, and several other pro apps that use it.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Why was it unfair, you ask? Because people buy Macs to edit video. They don't buy them to run Premiere 6.0 or any other specific version of a specific app. They buy Macs to get a job done and the tool to do it is largely inconsequential unless it has a horrid and hindering interface or prohibitively expensive.
Let's see them throw some OS X, FCP 3 numbers (especially with the real-time effects) into the mix and see what happens.
<strong>
Why was it unfair, you ask? Because people buy Macs to edit video. They don't buy them to run Premiere 6.0 or any other specific version of a specific app. They buy Macs to get a job done and the tool to do it is largely inconsequential unless it has a horrid and hindering interface or prohibitively expensive.
Let's see them throw some OS X, FCP 3 numbers (especially with the real-time effects) into the mix and see what happens.</strong><hr></blockquote>
and performance is not something they look for?
quit the mac blindness. it's just dumb. the mac got its ass kicked. accept it
<strong>I think it'd be very interesting to see these tests redone after we get the new PM's and/or when all these apps are available for OS X.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Indeed.
SdC
SdC