Light OS for PC?

Posted:
in Genius Bar edited January 2014
Until I buy a Mac on March or April, I want to install some light OS to replace (complement, really) my slow-booting, and -running XP setup. Would it be practical to get some flavor of Linux for just browsing the web with Firefox, instant messaging (Gaim or aMSN, I guess?), and some other basic tasks? If so, which one, or where could I read up on this?



(I have two partitions, and really don't want to format either--does this complicate things?)

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 9
    kickahakickaha Posts: 8,760member
    For the headache you'd have, I'd suggest just toughing it out for a couple of months. \
  • Reply 2 of 9
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Kickaha View Post


    For the headache you'd have, I'd suggest just toughing it out for a couple of months. \



    Haha, really? So there's not one distribution of Linux that is easy to install and run for simple ol' Firefox and OO.o or whatever? That sounds like a waste.



    And if curiosity drove me to confront the possibility of headaches (at least to wherever down the process I get), what'd be the choice? I read Ubuntu and SUSE are supposed to at least attempt at ease.
  • Reply 3 of 9
    kickahakickaha Posts: 8,760member
    I hear good things about Ubuntu, as being relatively trouble-free for setup and such.



    I was perhaps too flip, since obviously setting up a simple Linux system *is* doable - I've just come to the realization in the past year that often, 'simple things' are a lot more trouble than they're worth. :}
  • Reply 4 of 9
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Kickaha View Post


    I hear good things about Ubuntu, as being relatively trouble-free for setup and such.



    I was perhaps too flip, since obviously setting up a simple Linux system *is* doable - I've just come to the realization in the past year that often, 'simple things' are a lot more trouble than they're worth. :}



    Cool.



    Yeah, purism tends to drive me to inefficient practices--one should monitor marginal cost-benefit constantly. Anyway, my XP setup has become very slow and annoying, so I'm looking to streamline (though it might turn into just experimenting).
  • Reply 5 of 9
    splinemodelsplinemodel Posts: 7,311member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by DoctorRobert View Post


    Would it be practical to get some flavor of Linux for just browsing the web with Firefox, instant messaging (Gaim or aMSN, I guess?), and some other basic tasks?



    Yes. Almost any distro will do, and they are all very configurable. This is something of a mixed blessing. I've not tried Ubuntu, but SuSe was fairly easy to setup. It took a little bit of time for me to customize some of the things, but these were all kind-of esoteric features. Given that MS has latched it s claws into Novell, the next Linux machine I set up will not be SuSe. I will have to try Ubuntu.
  • Reply 6 of 9
    gikkugikku Posts: 10member
    PCLinuxOS Minime is only 250MB (or thereabouts), is a good linux distro with enough to get you started then you can download whatever it is you like, such as Firefox. 8)
  • Reply 7 of 9
    Cool, thanks.



    I'll be steering clear of SUSE.



    Especially nice of PCLinuxOS seems to be



    "

    Configuring printers to work under Linux can be a challenge for non-technical users. PCLinuxOS is capable of automatically recognizing and installing appropriate drivers for a wide range of printers.

    "

    (Wikipedia)
  • Reply 8 of 9
    kickahakickaha Posts: 8,760member
    Hmm, I thought Ubuntu did that as well, with CUPS. A coworker of mine just did the research on this, and went with Ubuntu after trying SUSE and pulling his hair out to get even simple things working.
  • Reply 9 of 9
    Ubuntu is a very nice Linux distro to work with. I've been using it for about two years now. All you need is there right on one single CD (Web browser, e-mail app, calendar, address book, OpenOffice etc.) and you can add almost anything you want later over the internet.
Sign In or Register to comment.